Sprintgeezer wrote:
Let me get this straight--
I will take all of those in turn.
First, regarding "conspiracy"--all a conspiracy is, ignoring all the popular negative connotations, is a secret agreement, usually to do something objectionable. In some contexts, concrete planning is required, and preparatory steps taken.
Do you even understand what evidence is? I almost always state what is fact and what is argument, supposition, and suggestion, except when I think it is clearly hyperbolic. Sometimes it might not be so clear, like when I say "clearly she doped". Obviously that is not evidence, or argument--it is pure conjecture.
I always consider evidence to the contrary. ALWAYS. I discuss this stuff ad nauseum, in case you haven't noticed.
You want a fight? Sure, I'll go, if there is actually a fight to be had. About precisely what do you want to fight?
I'm not sure where you're going with this. I don't recall ever having posted specifically on VCB. What we know is that 2 samples tested positive for a banned substance.
There is no reasonable excuse for this. The closest thing would be unknowing sabotage, which is also IMO unreasonable. She is articulate, she has means, she lives in a civilized situation. There can be, and will be, an explanation offered, but there is none that should avoid a ruling that an offense against the rules has been committed.
Again, I don't know if you want to fight about anything in particular.