I haven't seen any facts or data that contradicts my views, and you haven't ever shown any.
You've just repeated what I said.
There are subtle differences.
Can you show me what you allege I do not see, in the form of facts and data, without all the children's games, and without fabricating a contradictory strawman?
You don't even understand/know anymore what you have written.
Again, for you, what you have written: in distance running, most dopers are Kenyan. I know, you can't even see the difference between this and what you have written here.
And, yes, from your original claim, it without any doubt follows that almost all of the rest are clean.
You chose your user name well - but it is a question you should have directed at yourself.
That most of the dopers in distance running today are coming out of Kenya doesn't mean the rest are clean, but that relative to Kenya there are fewer of them.
You simply waste time in this discussion because you know nothing about doping and you're only here to parrot rekrunner's doping denial views. You're clearly another ****licker of the Kenyan dopers.
You also chose your name well, as the doping apologist that you are.
You know nothing about doping, you know nothing about elite training, you know nothing about coaching, you know nothing about elite performance, you know nothing about nutrition, you know nothing about an intelligent discussion. And yet, you waste our time on countless threads, every single day. Well, at least I guess you are on your way to succeed at getting to 30,000 posts before the Solstice.
That most of the dopers in distance running today are coming out of Kenya doesn't mean the rest are clean, but that relative to Kenya there are fewer of them.
Totally obvious, that you completely missed the point. It was explained - for nothing. Three more explanaitions will be also - for nothing.
Your original claim was: most dopers are Kenyan. So, maybe 1000 dopers, 600 Kenyans, 400 from all the other countries. (for you: 600 is bigger than 400 and 600+400=1000 - you got this?). When there are 20 times as many runners from other countries than from Kenya, it would mean the rate of dopers in "other countries" is just 1/30 (1/20*2/3) from the rate of dopers in Kenya. I know you can't understand this, and you never will. But it's still correct.
You chose your user name well - but it is a question you should have directed at yourself.
That most of the dopers in distance running today are coming out of Kenya doesn't mean the rest are clean, but that relative to Kenya there are fewer of them.
You simply waste time in this discussion because you know nothing about doping and you're only here to parrot rekrunner's doping denial views. You're clearly another ****licker of the Kenyan dopers.
You also chose your name well, as the doping apologist that you are.
You know nothing about doping, you know nothing about elite training, you know nothing about coaching, you know nothing about elite performance, you know nothing about nutrition, you know nothing about an intelligent discussion. And yet, you waste our time on countless threads, every single day. Well, at least I guess you are on your way to succeed at getting to 30,000 posts before the Solstice.
That most of the dopers in distance running today are coming out of Kenya doesn't mean the rest are clean, but that relative to Kenya there are fewer of them.
Totally obvious, that you completely missed the point. It was explained - for nothing. Three more explanaitions will be also - for nothing.
Your original claim was: most dopers are Kenyan. So, maybe 1000 dopers, 600 Kenyans, 400 from all the other countries. (for you: 600 is bigger than 400 and 600+400=1000 - you got this?). When there are 20 times as many runners from other countries than from Kenya, it would mean the rate of dopers in "other countries" is just 1/30 (1/20*2/3) from the rate of dopers in Kenya. I know you can't understand this, and you never will. But it's still correct.
You also chose your name well, as the doping apologist that you are.
You know nothing about doping, you know nothing about elite training, you know nothing about coaching, you know nothing about elite performance, you know nothing about nutrition, you know nothing about an intelligent discussion. And yet, you waste our time on countless threads, every single day. Well, at least I guess you are on your way to succeed at getting to 30,000 posts before the Solstice.
But you can't stop debating me.
No one can debate you. That would require two knowledgeable people. That immediately excludes you.
Can you show me what you allege I do not see, in the form of facts and data, without all the children's games, and without fabricating a contradictory strawman?
The doping deniers here can never give up and are filled with rage when they read what they don't like. To speak the facts about Kenyan doping pushes their every button. Kenya has made a disgrace of the sport.
Can you show me what you allege I do not see, in the form of facts and data, without all the children's games, and without fabricating a contradictory strawman?
How many years of your posts do I need refer to?
You don't need to refer to any of my posts to "show me what you allege I do not see, in the form of facts and data, without all the children's games, and without fabricating a contradictory strawman".
You need to create your own post and include the facts and data you want me to see, while excluding your imagination, and any wrong and baseless conclusions.
No one can debate you. That would require two knowledgeable people. That immediately excludes you.
Then why do you waste your time attacking me? Because it is a waste of time. You achieve nothing.
Attacking you? Oh you poor sensitive thing. Facts are not attacks. And why have you posted 29,000 times repeating the same exact things? It is a waste of time. You achieve nothing.
Then why do you waste your time attacking me? Because it is a waste of time. You achieve nothing.
Attacking you? Oh you poor sensitive thing. Facts are not attacks. And why have you posted 29,000 times repeating the same exact things? It is a waste of time. You achieve nothing.
You present no facts except "alternative facts". But you hang on my every post. Quite the stalker.
You don't need to refer to any of my posts to "show me what you allege I do not see, in the form of facts and data, without all the children's games, and without fabricating a contradictory strawman".
You need to create your own post and include the facts and data you want me to see, while excluding your imagination, and any wrong and baseless conclusions.
A cult leader will never be convinced of what he doesn't believe. I won't bother. But I can say without doubt that is the role you play here. Your every post shows it.
Attacking you? Oh you poor sensitive thing. Facts are not attacks. And why have you posted 29,000 times repeating the same exact things? It is a waste of time. You achieve nothing.
You present no facts except "alternative facts". But you hang on my every post. Quite the stalker.
If I am a stalker, what are you? You are like a puppy chasing after rekrunner.
Totally obvious, that you completely missed the point. It was explained - for nothing. Three more explanaitions will be also - for nothing.
Your original claim was: most dopers are Kenyan. So, maybe 1000 dopers, 600 Kenyans, 400 from all the other countries. (for you: 600 is bigger than 400 and 600+400=1000 - you got this?). When there are 20 times as many runners from other countries than from Kenya, it would mean the rate of dopers in "other countries" is just 1/30 (1/20*2/3) from the rate of dopers in Kenya. I know you can't understand this, and you never will. But it's still correct.
You still don't get it. But you never give up.
Your mistake in this issue was clearly exposed here.
As always when your mistakes/ignorance is exposed, you change the subject. Always.
You don't need to refer to any of my posts to "show me what you allege I do not see, in the form of facts and data, without all the children's games, and without fabricating a contradictory strawman".
You need to create your own post and include the facts and data you want me to see, while excluding your imagination, and any wrong and baseless conclusions.
A cult leader will never be convinced of what he doesn't believe. I won't bother. But I can say without doubt that is the role you play here. Your every post shows it.
Cult leader? You are only deluding yourself. This looks more like exagerrated projection from a cult follower. "Narcissistic projection is a defense mechanism used by narcissists to cope with their own feelings of inadequacy or insecurity by attributing these negative traits to others. This behavior often serves to deflect criticism and shift the blame away from them."
Regardless, once again, you show you cannot substantiate your baseless conclusions. You accuse me of failing to see something you are unable to show.
You want to believe I am a "doping denier" -- a self-coined expression with no clear definition -- simply for asking for facts and data. I do not deny athletes dope. Morever, I do not deny facts and data. What I have seen is that both WADA and the AIU have published much information about the specifics of Kenyan doping, including some of the causes for the large numbers of positive tests.
We've updated our BetterRunningShoes.com web site to make it easier to find good deals on the best shoes. To keep it great we need new shoe reviews from you.