Look you foolish fool, do you see what's happening between the both of us. We are going back and forth baselessly on who is baseless and who isn't, can't you see it??? What you should do is 1) file a defamation claim in a supreme court of your choice and haul me to court and settle the matter while we are both still alive on earth, or 2) wait for both of us to die or leave this earth and allow God to be the judge on who was more baseless than the other if couldn't be resolved while we were alive on earth.
Your ability to respond to me to say you are not lying and not using a different handle to conduct a dark agenda on me CAN BE INTERPRETED WITHIN CONTEXT AND BY LIMITATIONS as baseless as well, did you know that fool?????
If I were right and you indeed committed vulgar and profane offences against me, then God would definitely approve of my 'immoral and unethical' foresight and prescience rather than slander or libel against you!!!! Do you understand rekrunner????
"I suspect some posters here do not appreciate that I tend to completely strip their posts of all their subjectivity, looking only for objective facts, evidence, and controlled observations, interpreted in context, that I may have missed."
The moderators side with you and there seems to be a revolving door between you and them. They completely swallow and digest all your supposedly 'factual' accounts when they are merely still your subjectivity. Did you know that you trying to strip people's post of their subjectivity is in and of itself SUBJECTIVE OR OF SUBJECTIVITY PER SE?????????? Before you put blame on another fellow man, look at the speck in your eye in the mirror first!!!!!
"In my limited understanding, what "God" is seems to be a function of the people you ask, and something that evolves over time. For example, just compare the Christian God of the Old Testament to the New Testament."
That's why you aren't or have never known the meaning of a true Christian, dear rekrunner, when you it could spill from your foolish mouth that 'God seems to be a function of the people you ask and something that evolves over time' LOL!!!!!! You are amazing, dear rekrunner, just simply WOW!!!!! Any true God-fearing Pastor or believer who knows and reads and exemplifies Scripture and Christ will truly balk at your unbelievable ignorance at best and blasphemy at worst!!!! I'm trying to be sarcastic here, but even if I were, you really deserve it for being so babe-like in the area of Christianity. You really shouldn't open your mouth to talk about my religion and disgrace yourself in front of true Christians who knows Yahweh!!!!!
"As you have repeatedly argued for yourself, it is the combination of subjectivity and objectivity that is most superior, and I have an ample supply of my own subjectivity."
The combination of subjectivity and objectivity that brings the truth is MY PATENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, you are not supposed to reference it in a superficial manner like this much less to prejudice the truth!!!! Don't semantically piggyback on my copyrighted rights and property of statement to steal an advantage for yourself in any argument or debate with me thinking I will miss it or don't see it!!!!
I see everything with you dear rekrunner, and my not replying to every single issue I take with you doesn't mean because I lost the argument/debate and am running scared because after all between the 2 of us, it's the one who has strong Christian roots and foundation that presides over any argument/debate and rule it!
Agreed sir. Mo Katir is proven doper despite all the contraindications assumed by the hypocritical and fake-minded rekrunner!!
Given WADA's broad definition of "Doping", I cannot really dispute "proven doper" without a "casual obsever wannabe" scolding me to read the rules and use the right terms.
In all of these threads, I think I never disputed Katir's "doping", i.e. his three whereabouts failures and the resulting violation and the resulting 2-year ban.
I find your baseless and misguided accusations of contraindications and hypocrisy and fake-mindedness immoral and unethical. You should aspire to keep the high moral ground. God is watching you.
Says the man that says people's beliefs about God evolve over time and are a function of the people you ask LOL!!!!!
If you, dear rekrunner, didn't already know you have shown yourself in front of earthly men your own baseless-ness, hypocrisy and fake-mindedness by precisely making the above statements, and/or, believing upon them, I don't know how a person like you can be expected to provide solid (including moral) leadership mettle to a society, group of people or otherwise. Much less be the beacon of light for LRC?????
Not sure why the mods are very enchanted hence prejudiced towards you when it's quite plain before my, and everybody else's eyes that you are dumpster standard of a man, a person or otherwise human being in general!!!!!
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
Thank you sir! Very much appreciated! I walk the talk, if I were baseless or a sinner, which I of course am since all men has sinned, I'm definitely RELATIVELY FAR LESS BASELESS AND SINFUL than a certain rekrunner!
everyone loves to pounce on the "guilty" athlete, and rightfully so because we all are passionate about fairness in sport. However, it's important to reflect on the nuances. We are talking about athletes from disparate countries, cultures, socioeconomic backgrounds across the globe. All us tech-saavy posters onto forum take navigation of the modern Internet world for granted. Someone with a different educational and cultural background and different cognitive skills might easily get confused, frustrated, and careless about keeping up with the extremely stringent whereabouts rules. I'm not saying Katir is tech-clueless or cognitively challenged, but its a possibility. Also, as an elite international athlete he should have people looking out for him if tech is not his thing - beyond dad answering the door again and saying he's gone. He deserves to be penalized for sure but losing a couple years is quite severe for clerical shortcomings. Instead, how about just call him in for a test on his 3rd violation? How about subject him to weekly testing for next 12 or 24 months as 'punishment'? What if he really was clueless, careless, brazen and tech-challenged? Listen, I have known many tunnel-vision hard training athletes who had trouble keeping up with routine matters of daily life. Years ago, I was visiting Kenny Souza in Boulder for multisport training - he's the #1 duathlete of all-time and one of the greatest endurance athletes of all time. One day he picks up his (land line) phone and there's no dial tone. We pedal over to the phone company to learn his line's been disconnected due to past due bill. He's traveling the globe for races and training six hours a day and misses some bills and cut-off final notices. Go figure.
Look you foolish fool, do you see what's happening between the both of us. We are going back and forth baselessly on who is baseless and who isn't, can't you see it??? What you should do is 1) file a defamation claim in a supreme court of your choice and haul me to court and settle the matter while we are both still alive on earth, or 2) wait for both of us to die or leave this earth and allow God to be the judge on who was more baseless than the other if couldn't be resolved while we were alive on earth.
Your ability to respond to me to say you are not lying and not using a different handle to conduct a dark agenda on me CAN BE INTERPRETED WITHIN CONTEXT AND BY LIMITATIONS as baseless as well, did you know that fool?????
If I were right and you indeed committed vulgar and profane offences against me, then God would definitely approve of my 'immoral and unethical' foresight and prescience rather than slander or libel against you!!!! Do you understand rekrunner????
"I suspect some posters here do not appreciate that I tend to completely strip their posts of all their subjectivity, looking only for objective facts, evidence, and controlled observations, interpreted in context, that I may have missed."
The moderators side with you and there seems to be a revolving door between you and them. They completely swallow and digest all your supposedly 'factual' accounts when they are merely still your subjectivity. Did you know that you trying to strip people's post of their subjectivity is in and of itself SUBJECTIVE OR OF SUBJECTIVITY PER SE?????????? Before you put blame on another fellow man, look at the speck in your eye in the mirror first!!!!!
"In my limited understanding, what "God" is seems to be a function of the people you ask, and something that evolves over time. For example, just compare the Christian God of the Old Testament to the New Testament."
That's why you aren't or have never known the meaning of a true Christian, dear rekrunner, when you it could spill from your foolish mouth that 'God seems to be a function of the people you ask and something that evolves over time' LOL!!!!!! You are amazing, dear rekrunner, just simply WOW!!!!! Any true God-fearing Pastor or believer who knows and reads and exemplifies Scripture and Christ will truly balk at your unbelievable ignorance at best and blasphemy at worst!!!! I'm trying to be sarcastic here, but even if I were, you really deserve it for being so babe-like in the area of Christianity. You really shouldn't open your mouth to talk about my religion and disgrace yourself in front of true Christians who knows Yahweh!!!!!
"As you have repeatedly argued for yourself, it is the combination of subjectivity and objectivity that is most superior, and I have an ample supply of my own subjectivity."
The combination of subjectivity and objectivity that brings the truth is MY PATENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, you are not supposed to reference it in a superficial manner like this much less to prejudice the truth!!!! Don't semantically piggyback on my copyrighted rights and property of statement to steal an advantage for yourself in any argument or debate with me thinking I will miss it or don't see it!!!!
I see everything with you dear rekrunner, and my not replying to every single issue I take with you doesn't mean because I lost the argument/debate and am running scared because after all between the 2 of us, it's the one who has strong Christian roots and foundation that presides over any argument/debate and rule it!
I have an advantage on this point, as I have direct and complete knowledge of which posts I have created, while you can only respond with your brand of inferior baseless belief lacking such complete knowledge. I have no special obligation to convince you of the truth, but I can leverage my direct and complete knowledge to help me guage your general credibility based on your tendency to jump to false conclusions.
You now give me yet another example of jumping to false conclusions with the subject of moderation. Again, I have direct and complete knowledge that I have no special direct or indirect relation with any of the moderators. I can only speculate that they are biased in favor of the kinds of civil posts they explicitly describe in their guidelines.
Given these two clear examples, I can see I was right to challenge you about your RF/EMF claims and request 3rd party authoritative verification with objective controlled observations.
I don't really want to open any discussion of religions and gods, at least not in this thread, and certainly not before we can clarify what you mean by some of the language and terms you use.
You speak about Christianity, but I know enough to know that this is just one of many faiths worldwide, and only a minority of the world population (about 30%) call themselves Christians -- and a minority of these will be considered "true Christians". Applying the theme of the zodiac, here are 12 major religions: Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, Shinto, Islam, Sikhism, Confucianism, Jainism, Hinduism, Taoism, Baha'i, and Zoroastrianism. It is estimated globally that there are nearly 4,000 recognized faiths. This likely excludes the faiths of groups of people that were historically conquered, or have gone extinct, and certainly excludes atheists and secularists.
Even within the Christian faiths, there are a number of significant denominations. At a top-level, there are Roman Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox, and Anglican. Keeping with the theme of the zodiac, here are 12 variations which make up just "Western" Christianity: Adventism, Anabaptism, Anglicanism, Baptists, Lutheranism, Methodism, Moravianism, Pentecostalism, Plymouth Brethren, Quakerism, Reformed, and Waldensianism. But it doesn't stop there. Estimations show there are more than 200 Christian denominations in the U.S. and a staggering 45,000 globally, according to the Center for the Study of Global Christianity.
In light of all this historical knowledge, who can claim to know "the meaning of a true Christian"? I suppose to truly know, one would have to consult the original biblical texts in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. Which of your God-fearing Pastors have consulted these original scriptures?
Similarly, there are historically many names of the "one God", depending on your faith: Besides "Yahweh", there is Jehovah, Elohim, Allah, Buddha, Ya-huang, Ra, Horus, Ahura Mazda, Zeus, Jupiter, etc. Which God should the God-fearing believer fear?
Says the man that says people's beliefs about God evolve over time and are a function of the people you ask LOL!!!!!
If you, dear rekrunner, didn't already know you have shown yourself in front of earthly men your own baseless-ness, hypocrisy and fake-mindedness by precisely making the above statements, and/or, believing upon them, I don't know how a person like you can be expected to provide solid (including moral) leadership mettle to a society, group of people or otherwise. Much less be the beacon of light for LRC?????
Not sure why the mods are very enchanted hence prejudiced towards you when it's quite plain before my, and everybody else's eyes that you are dumpster standard of a man, a person or otherwise human being in general!!!!!
Perhaps you are unaware of the gods of the ancient Greeks, ancient Romans, ancient Egyptians, the Jewish people, the Islamic people, Buddhists, Hindus, ancient North and Central and South American Indians, the African tribes, etc.
I don't purport to be a moral leader or beacon of light. You seem to be most upset with me because I asked you to lead me to objective facts, and to RF-King authorities who are exploring your RF/EMF claims on sports performance more deeply.
Look you foolish fool, do you see what's happening between the both of us. We are going back and forth baselessly on who is baseless and who isn't, can't you see it??? What you should do is 1) file a defamation claim in a supreme court of your choice and haul me to court and settle the matter while we are both still alive on earth, or 2) wait for both of us to die or leave this earth and allow God to be the judge on who was more baseless than the other if couldn't be resolved while we were alive on earth.
Your ability to respond to me to say you are not lying and not using a different handle to conduct a dark agenda on me CAN BE INTERPRETED WITHIN CONTEXT AND BY LIMITATIONS as baseless as well, did you know that fool?????
If I were right and you indeed committed vulgar and profane offences against me, then God would definitely approve of my 'immoral and unethical' foresight and prescience rather than slander or libel against you!!!! Do you understand rekrunner????
"I suspect some posters here do not appreciate that I tend to completely strip their posts of all their subjectivity, looking only for objective facts, evidence, and controlled observations, interpreted in context, that I may have missed."
The moderators side with you and there seems to be a revolving door between you and them. They completely swallow and digest all your supposedly 'factual' accounts when they are merely still your subjectivity. Did you know that you trying to strip people's post of their subjectivity is in and of itself SUBJECTIVE OR OF SUBJECTIVITY PER SE?????????? Before you put blame on another fellow man, look at the speck in your eye in the mirror first!!!!!
"In my limited understanding, what "God" is seems to be a function of the people you ask, and something that evolves over time. For example, just compare the Christian God of the Old Testament to the New Testament."
That's why you aren't or have never known the meaning of a true Christian, dear rekrunner, when you it could spill from your foolish mouth that 'God seems to be a function of the people you ask and something that evolves over time' LOL!!!!!! You are amazing, dear rekrunner, just simply WOW!!!!! Any true God-fearing Pastor or believer who knows and reads and exemplifies Scripture and Christ will truly balk at your unbelievable ignorance at best and blasphemy at worst!!!! I'm trying to be sarcastic here, but even if I were, you really deserve it for being so babe-like in the area of Christianity. You really shouldn't open your mouth to talk about my religion and disgrace yourself in front of true Christians who knows Yahweh!!!!!
"As you have repeatedly argued for yourself, it is the combination of subjectivity and objectivity that is most superior, and I have an ample supply of my own subjectivity."
The combination of subjectivity and objectivity that brings the truth is MY PATENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, you are not supposed to reference it in a superficial manner like this much less to prejudice the truth!!!! Don't semantically piggyback on my copyrighted rights and property of statement to steal an advantage for yourself in any argument or debate with me thinking I will miss it or don't see it!!!!
I see everything with you dear rekrunner, and my not replying to every single issue I take with you doesn't mean because I lost the argument/debate and am running scared because after all between the 2 of us, it's the one who has strong Christian roots and foundation that presides over any argument/debate and rule it!
I have an advantage on this point, as I have direct and complete knowledge of which posts I have created, while you can only respond with your brand of inferior baseless belief lacking such complete knowledge. I have no special obligation to convince you of the truth, but I can leverage my direct and complete knowledge to help me guage your general credibility based on your tendency to jump to false conclusions.
You now give me yet another example of jumping to false conclusions with the subject of moderation. Again, I have direct and complete knowledge that I have no special direct or indirect relation with any of the moderators. I can only speculate that they are biased in favor of the kinds of civil posts they explicitly describe in their guidelines.
Given these two clear examples, I can see I was right to challenge you about your RF/EMF claims and request 3rd party authoritative verification with objective controlled observations.
I don't really want to open any discussion of religions and gods, at least not in this thread, and certainly not before we can clarify what you mean by some of the language and terms you use.
You speak about Christianity, but I know enough to know that this is just one of many faiths worldwide, and only a minority of the world population (about 30%) call themselves Christians -- and a minority of these will be considered "true Christians". Applying the theme of the zodiac, here are 12 major religions: Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, Shinto, Islam, Sikhism, Confucianism, Jainism, Hinduism, Taoism, Baha'i, and Zoroastrianism. It is estimated globally that there are nearly 4,000 recognized faiths. This likely excludes the faiths of groups of people that were historically conquered, or have gone extinct, and certainly excludes atheists and secularists.
Even within the Christian faiths, there are a number of significant denominations. At a top-level, there are Roman Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox, and Anglican. Keeping with the theme of the zodiac, here are 12 variations which make up just "Western" Christianity: Adventism, Anabaptism, Anglicanism, Baptists, Lutheranism, Methodism, Moravianism, Pentecostalism, Plymouth Brethren, Quakerism, Reformed, and Waldensianism. But it doesn't stop there. Estimations show there are more than 200 Christian denominations in the U.S. and a staggering 45,000 globally, according to the Center for the Study of Global Christianity.
In light of all this historical knowledge, who can claim to know "the meaning of a true Christian"? I suppose to truly know, one would have to consult the original biblical texts in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. Which of your God-fearing Pastors have consulted these original scriptures?
Similarly, there are historically many names of the "one God", depending on your faith: Besides "Yahweh", there is Jehovah, Elohim, Allah, Buddha, Ya-huang, Ra, Horus, Ahura Mazda, Zeus, Jupiter, etc. Which God should the God-fearing believer fear?
Look the whole point of your purported objectivity is to remove the reliance on you for your own claims. I need at least 2 moderator references that I can rely on to show or tell me which are your posts and which aren't. And if anonymous posts cannot be tracked to your name due to the very configuration of the forum, then I'm sorry, there is at least a 50 percent chance (to be fair to both of us) that you have profaned my sexuality, do you understand sir???
You can send the references to , or get the moderators to do so. I also need to know that they are real moderators not fake ones.
Look I read the guidelines as well, and nowhere does it state that one should narrowly interpret facts within the cunning unfaithful two-faced context of semanticism which you, dear rekrunner, are and have been doing so!!! Do you need me to be the King Moderator and rewrite the rules to ban cunning unfaithful two-faced semantical context???
I certainly don't want to have a conversation about Christ with you either. Christ demands abiding faith, and, semantical dissection of Scripture only within the confines or beholden to abiding faith. However, your semantical dissection isn't of Scripture (as you quote no bible verses to support all your claims above!!!) hence isn't of abiding faith but rather one of wasteful and listless existential angst at not being able to overcome my superior arguments and premises and assumptions!!!!!!
I show you again what you just wrote below:
"Even within the Christian faiths, there are a number of significant denominations. At a top-level, there are Roman Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox, and Anglican. Keeping with the theme of the zodiac, here are 12 variations which make up just "Western" Christianity: Adventism, Anabaptism, Anglicanism, Baptists, Lutheranism, Methodism, Moravianism, Pentecostalism, Plymouth Brethren, Quakerism, Reformed, and Waldensianism. But it doesn't stop there. Estimations show there are more than 200 Christian denominations in the U.S. and a staggering 45,000 globally, according to the Center for the Study of Global Christianity."
A real Christian on LRC doesn't hesitate one bit about how there are so many potentially confusing ( I suppose for you) forms of Christianity, they won't bother about it, they know it's all about THE HEART!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And THE HEART can only be trained and conditioned by SCRIPTURE!!!! Good pastors, churches and Christians normally use the old or new king james version, but recognize that for the younger children sometimes its better to use the new international versions for a start. But, the heart and soul of the bible, the intangible substance that doesn't change and remains constant, doesn't change even if the language used is slightly different. The meaning of the Scripture and the knowledge it imputes in you is a MIRACLE OF FAITH by first principles!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Look my pastor was a bible scholar. And even proper church teachers go for training in bible colleges and are taught all the ancient hebrew and greek texts. This is to account for any text translation to ensure the substance of the texts in the bible aren't prejudiced. Even if they are, I already mentioned the intangible meaning and substance of the bible which is LOVE does not change because God SUPERNATURALLY controls collective human will/behavior/intention in order to prevent them from corrupting Scripture's meanings. Real God-loving bible scholars and pastors don't work on the assumption that the bible is wrong thus looking for a single word semantical inconsistency to falsify the entire bible. The theory of falsifiability does not apply for heavenly or supernatural texts, it only applies to the man-made realm of science such as sport science. Your ignorance is quite apparent in being not privy to when to apply the theory of falsifiability and when not to!!!
Look you can call a cow your God or a dog the same. Why do you need to subject (hence subjectify) your knowledge of God to such a limited narrow-minded way of their respective names in various religions????
First of all, are you even a Christian or a religious hence of what religion???? Please answer this question before we go any further because if you aren't you are just wasting my time and not even fit to talk about this subject.
Also tell me your definition of God.....
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.
Says the man that says people's beliefs about God evolve over time and are a function of the people you ask LOL!!!!!
If you, dear rekrunner, didn't already know you have shown yourself in front of earthly men your own baseless-ness, hypocrisy and fake-mindedness by precisely making the above statements, and/or, believing upon them, I don't know how a person like you can be expected to provide solid (including moral) leadership mettle to a society, group of people or otherwise. Much less be the beacon of light for LRC?????
Not sure why the mods are very enchanted hence prejudiced towards you when it's quite plain before my, and everybody else's eyes that you are dumpster standard of a man, a person or otherwise human being in general!!!!!
Perhaps you are unaware of the gods of the ancient Greeks, ancient Romans, ancient Egyptians, the Jewish people, the Islamic people, Buddhists, Hindus, ancient North and Central and South American Indians, the African tribes, etc.
I don't purport to be a moral leader or beacon of light. You seem to be most upset with me because I asked you to lead me to objective facts, and to RF-King authorities who are exploring your RF/EMF claims on sports performance more deeply.
You and I, we are talking about completely different things. Don't even think to find any association between both of our texts and posts. I was talking about Christian fundamental doctrine and teaching that is inerrant, constant and unchanging by supernatural indeed miraculous PROVIDENCE OF GOD!!!!!!!!
True Christians know that God in all its splendorous ways and means does not change in space and time because he is outside of it!!!! 1 aeon is a single nano-second gone by for him, otherwise it cannot even be measured at all!!!! Your language is earthly and earthly-trained and conditioned, while my language is heavenly, and heavenly directed and conditioned!!!
I already showed you all the entire vista of harm of anthropogenic RF and EMF on sport performance and human biological health, so if you claim you have any advantage that you know which posts belongs to you and which isn't, I also claim my own advantage over you!!! Please review all my previous posts on sport performance eternally until you are enlightened.
Now the mods are going to allow Rekrunner to destroy important doping threads with back and forth walls of text arguments about Christianity. Unreal.
While I'm simultaneous happy and indifferent to receive all the credit and blame, everyone else can objectively see for themselves it is Khamis who wants to talk about "God" and "true Christians", in this thread about a Spaniard who missed three tests.
I wonder if Mohamed Katir has joined the Catholic church while living in Spain. In any case, Muslims and Christians worship the same Abrahamic God as the Jewish.
IIRC, Salazar is also a devout man of faith. Things that make me go "hmmm".
Now the mods are going to allow Rekrunner to destroy important doping threads with back and forth walls of text arguments about Christianity. Unreal.
While I'm simultaneous happy and indifferent to receive all the credit and blame, everyone else can objectively see for themselves it is Khamis who wants to talk about "God" and "true Christians", in this thread about a Spaniard who missed three tests.
I wonder if Mohamed Katir has joined the Catholic church while living in Spain. In any case, Muslims and Christians worship the same Abrahamic God as the Jewish.
IIRC, Salazar is also a devout man of faith. Things that make me go "hmmm".
"it is Khamis who wants to talk about God and true Christians"
Umm no I'm sorry??? I was trying to reply to you wanting to offend true Christians and God by saying God is ever-changing (with definite implication that God is unreliable) and that true Christians (don't exist) again by implication of the subtle meaning of your statements. There is embedded sly condescension in all your talk about true Christians and God that anybody who has a human soul/heart/spirit can evoke; it's like body language in a social interaction. People can sense the way you hang your body in space and time the degree of conviction of your speech/words!!!!
I'm a psychologist hence psycho-analyst by evolution by my training and mastery in RF and EMF domain, so I dissect the psychology implications and meanings of all your statements, including cunning semanticism in narrow defence of NOPers and Alberto!!!!
I was merely defending against rekrunner's libelous claims against God and true Christians that's all I ever did. I need to defend this because I work for God and true Christians, and not for sex predators and drug-mad and alcohol-mad like Alberto Salazar.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
We've updated our BetterRunningShoes.com web site to make it easier to find good deals on the best shoes. To keep it great we need new shoe reviews from you.