Show me where she did that. The twitter thread has nothing like that. It is just nit picking BS which are clearly just some pinhead using a plagiarism program to try to make it look like they found something audacious. But if you actually look at the examples, there is not a single example of lifting entire paragraphs or anything even close. In fact, the whole point of nitwits like Rufo is that they know that their followers will take anything they say as gospel because confirmation bias drives their clicks.
So, show me where she lifted entire paragraphs or admit that you are just a sheep being herded by right wing dufuses like Rufo.
It was shown in the thread, short-bus.
"It’s not enough to change a few words here and there and leave the rest; instead, you must completely restate the ideas in the passage in your own words....If your own language is too close to the original, then you are plagiarizing, even if you do provide a citation."-Harvard Honor Code
President Diversity, without quotes: "African-Americans in 'high-black-empowerment' areas-- as indicated by control of the mayor's office-- are more active than either African-Americans in low empowerment areas or their white counterparts of comparable socioeconomic status. Empowerment, they conclude, influence black participation by contributing to a more trusting and efficacious orientation towards politics and by greatly increasing black attentiveness to political affairs."
Source: "blacks in 'high-black-empowerment' areas-- as indicated by control of the mayor's office-- are more active than either blacks living in low-empowerment areas or their white counterparts of comparable socioeconomic status... empowerment influence black participation by contributing to a more trusting and efficacious orientation towards politics and by greatly increasing black attentiveness to political affairs."
Would you say that President Diversity's language is in her own words here?
The thing is that when you have argue such specifics that the lay-person can’t tell… it’s not a story. “She didn’t abide by the prescriptive policies of academic writing” isn’t really something that will rile up the general populace despite your best efforts.
I am absolutely shocked the LR Jew hater is at it again.
Just remember, as long as LR allows him to keep posting his blatant hatred for Jews they are admitting they feel it is ok.
According to the jojos probably, hate speech against groups of people is just the kind of stuff runners like to discuss on runs.
I’ve blocked that fool and his other aliases. If most everyone does that, he’ll get bored. It’s not too hard to recognize his unregistered aliases as well from his writing.
I am absolutely shocked the LR Jew hater is at it again.
Just remember, as long as LR allows him to keep posting his blatant hatred for Jews they are admitting they feel it is ok.
According to the jojos probably, hate speech against groups of people is just the kind of stuff runners like to discuss on runs.
I’ve blocked that fool and his other aliases. If most everyone does that, he’ll get bored. It’s not too hard to recognize his unregistered aliases as well from his writing.
Interesting.
I post only under my registered name.
Who else are you blocking.
I am still waiting for examples of my posts showing blatant hatred for Jews.