Looks like Hilliard Davidson‘s only senior Boyd is entered in this race. He didn’t run track at all last year
-
01
-
hmmidkatall wrote:
Meets are coming up wrote:
OHSAA Early Season Invitational 2023
Entries listQuite a few central Ohio teams not entered. Kilbourne v Medina for the win?
no chance Kilbourne winning a meet this year
02 -
no chance there win wrote:
hmmidkatall wrote:
Quite a few central Ohio teams not entered. Kilbourne v Medina for the win?
no chance Kilbourne winning a meet this year
Not even OCCs, where they've won 3 of the last 4 years?
10 -
no chance there win wrote:
hmmidkatall wrote:
Quite a few central Ohio teams not entered. Kilbourne v Medina for the win?
no chance Kilbourne winning a meet this year
I think qualifying for the state meet will be considered an outstanding accomplishment for Kilbourne
01 -
#145
This post was removed.
-
State meet is always good wrote:
no chance there win wrote:
no chance Kilbourne winning a meet this year
I think qualifying for the state meet will be considered an outstanding accomplishment for Kilbourne
With Smith (9:05/15:13), Miller (4:18/15:32), and Hawkens (4:24/16:00), NOT qualifying for state would be a huge under-performance. Just making it there won't be a huge accomplishment, given this kind of up front talent. Finishing in the top 5 could be considered outstanding.
10 -
This quoted post has been removed.
He definitely has a good chance to make NXN
00 -
Good chance wrote:
This quoted post has been removed.
He definitely has a good chance to make NXN
Agreed. Both he and Richuitti have a great chance. There are a few other Ohio boys who could surprise in the right race, but these two probably have the best shot.
00 -
realitybites wrote:
State meet is always good wrote:
I think qualifying for the state meet will be considered an outstanding accomplishment for Kilbourne
With Smith (9:05/15:13), Miller (4:18/15:32), and Hawkens (4:24/16:00), NOT qualifying for state would be a huge under-performance. Just making it there won't be a huge accomplishment, given this kind of up front talent. Finishing in the top 5 could be considered outstanding.
Their success depends on how their 4th and 5th runners do.
The “OHSAA Early Season Invitational 2023”, which will be held on August 19, will give us an idea on what Kilbourne has at 4th and 5th positions.00 -
Interestingggg wrote:
Coffman overrated, Jerome underrated. Switch these two and I think these are about as good as can be determined right now. Lancaster might be a little high. Though very deep, they've lost a ton from last year's squad.
33 -
hmmidkatall wrote:
Interestingggg wrote:
Coffman overrated, Jerome underrated. Switch these two and I think these are about as good as can be determined right now. Lancaster might be a little high. Though very deep, they've lost a ton from last year's squad.
Also... 9 teams from Region 3 in the top 18. Accurate or no?
11 -
hmmidkatall wrote:
Interestingggg wrote:
Coffman overrated, Jerome underrated. Switch these two and I think these are about as good as can be determined right now. Lancaster might be a little high. Though very deep, they've lost a ton from last year's squad.
Maybe whoever compiled the rankings accidentally messed up Coffman with Jerome on this chart?
It’s a little surprising that Mason got 10 first place votes but Mas Jackson and St Xavier got only 1. I think all 3 teams have a good chance to win this meet, with Mason being the slight favorite
10 -
OHSAA Early Season Invitational - live results
10 -
Ruberm wrote:
OHSAA Early Season Invitational - live results
Kilbourne dominated. No official results yet (??), but scoring at the 2-mile mark looked like this:
Kilbourne 112
Steele 190
Davidson 204
Smith with the easy win. 15:25 or so.
10 -
Kilbourne has a very strong 1-2-3.
Their 4 and 5 were around the 17 minute mark which is good too.Hil Davidson:
Boyd is back after not running track which helps the team. Their #3 ran a sub-16:50 after not running varsity last year which gives the team a boost.
Their 4 and 5 were in the 17:20s.
They are going to struggle to make state this year, but for what they have left, they did very well, and a year from now we will see great things from them20 -
Good chance wrote:
Kilbourne has a very strong 1-2-3.
Their 4 and 5 were around the 17 minute mark which is good too.Hil Davidson:
Boyd is back after not running track which helps the team. Their #3 ran a sub-16:50 after not running varsity last year which gives the team a boost.
Their 4 and 5 were in the 17:20s.
They are going to struggle to make state this year, but for what they have left, they did very well, and a year from now we will see great things from themOfficial Results:
Kilbourne 117
Steele 184
Rocky River 202
H. Davidson 207
Westerville Central 260
Kilbourne's top 5 go 15:25, 16:08, 16:11, 17:01, 17:01. Very impressive for mid-August, but many top teams weren't there. We'll see how it goes when Coffman, Jerome, Orange, Lancaster get in the mix in Central Oh.
10 -
no chance there win wrote:
hmmidkatall wrote:
Quite a few central Ohio teams not entered. Kilbourne v Medina for the win?
no chance Kilbourne winning a meet this year
Yeah this aged like milk
40 -
no chance there win wrote:
no chance Kilbourne winning a meet this year
This is one of the most ignorant predictions ever
10
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
Of General Interest
-
Does not wanting my kids to watch a bisexual threesome at the Olympics make me a bigot?
-
No scholarship limits anymore! (NCAA Track and Field inequality is going to get way worse, right?)
-
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
-
Gudaf Tsegay will not race the 10000m? Just to spite the federation?
-
Matt Fox/SweatElite harasses one of his clients after they called him out