Serious thread about election fraud

If the Democrats were committing fraud, why were there so many increases in TRUMP's lead that were ALSO close to 4800 or close to multiples of 4800?

The logic of the jumps in 4800 is that they calculated the required delta and parceled it out evenly at every update. But why in the world would they do the same thing for Trump??

Ding ding ding. Gary, you have literally not responded to a single aspect of the epic takedown you just experienced. Honestly, it is a shame that someone had to take the time to expose you for the complete fraud that you are but I am happy that it happened. Not simple because it feels good to see dishonest, stupid people exposed but also because, hopefully, just one person who follows along on this thread and nods their head when you speak will question themselves.

It's not bogus data. It's the same day, presented in a way that is easy to digest and very clearly and straightforwardly explained. It can't even be confused because there's never an example of exactly a multiple of 4800. "1" would never appear on the graph you're confusing my chart with.

I've successfully avoided you in the past by avoiding cesspools like the Dow and Trump threads. From what I've seen in this thread, I'm going to go back to that.

The telegraphing you're smart while saying dumb things.

The claiming mountains of data, then moving the goalposts to can someone just see here you are coming from, then finally just totally spamming debunked speculations.

The claiming you'll engage with only two people and then replying to everyone when those two don't engage.

The complaining about people using insults, while using insults.

The setting very clear guidelines for what will help you see the light ("if Trump also has lead gains of multiples of 4800 then these people are being misleading") and then moving the goalposts once that been shown to be the case.

The claiming incoherence and distrust to information presented you very straightforwardly.

It almost seems like it's all on purpose.

I don't know if you're a really committed, relatively clever troll, or just incredibly dumb and blinded, but at this point I'm not sure which is worse. Either way my prior comment holds: you're unreachable. God bless

Gary, quick question:

Do you honestly believe that you are the first and only person, 60 days later, to figure out this massive, smoking gun anomaly? You do realize that there are thousands of well-funded Republicans, lobbyists, corporations and other entities who stand to gain far more than you if Trump were to win, who no doubt over-analyzed this data long before now?

Relax. I have to create a graph that shows what's happening, and leaves no room for someone to claim I'm cooking the data. I haven't decided on a format. The original link to the article didn't include all the data, which left the analysis open to criticisms of cherry picking. I need to put it all in context. In context it actually looks worse than what they show. The transition from random updates to the 4,800 series is going to stand out.

I did dump loads of evidence.

I gave up on two people because that wasn't working.

So you think I sound smart huh? Thanks!

DiscoGary= Pizzagate guy of election fraud wrote:

Gary, quick question:

Do you honestly believe that you are the first and only person, 60 days later, to figure out this massive, smoking gun anomaly? You do realize that there are thousands of well-funded Republicans, lobbyists, corporations and other entities who stand to gain far more than you if Trump were to win, who no doubt over-analyzed this data long before now?

No. These people found it and reported it on Nov 19th :

The problem with this data is that it is not "proof" of fraud in a legal sense. Its the smoking gun, but you have to prove who fired it. If you gambled on a coin toss and lost 17 straight times, then you would say "I've been cheated", but in a court you would have to show how to get compensated.

I'm looking at the data and saying "Trump was cheated". The method of cheating is covered by all the accusations Trump was making. Those are things a court can work with. Of course, this kind of data should be enough for the FEC, FBI, State Legislatures, the media, etc to start investigations, but there's no functioning justice for Trump in this country right now so let's forget about that.

Here you go, one last olive branch before I'm done here. Here's all the "ons" in my prior chart, but with the raw data and time stamps included so you can verify that none of these numbers were 'cooked' with your data source as well. Just in case you really are someone who's going to 'start coding' but the concept of zeros and ones still went over your head. Red for Trump, Blue for Biden.

https://imgur.com/a/kknIfJW

Moving goalposts is all Gary knows.

Nope. Need to show all the updates in the chart. You're intentionally focusing on the 4,800 exclusively, when its the context of the 17 4,800 series within the larger data set that is statistically impossible.

DiscoGary wrote:

Now if I run the data and find that there are also quantised jumps for Trump in those quantities that were left out of the summary, then the analysis is misleading and provides no direct evidence of fraud.

Ok boomer.

just the facts, ma'am wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Now if I run the data and find that there are also quantised jumps for Trump in those quantities that were left out of the summary, then the analysis is misleading and provides no direct evidence of fraud.

Ok boomer.

Hang in there.

Trump raised over $200,000,000 after the election! Still couldn't find anything!

Now I have the chart but I have to get it into the forum.

DiscoGary wrote:

Nope. Need to show all the updates in the chart. You're intentionally focusing on the 4,800 exclusively, when its the context of the 17 4,800 series within the larger data set that is statistically impossible.

Hey Gary, we're both Trump supporters here. We're friends. I'm trying just as hard as you to figure out how the radical leftists stole the election.

Help me understand this. Look at just the fact's data. Why did the radical leftists give Trump net increases in votes that were very close to 4800 near the beginning and end of the count if they were trying to help Sleepy Joe steal the election?

What exactly was their strategy? Why would their cheating tacting involve helping the other candidate??

"Trump hit net gain multiples 'close to 4800' 20 times in only 2.5 hours of counting on the first day. This is statistically impossible and a clear indication of fraud."

(Bidens 17 we're over 6 days. The fraud slow game I guess.)

just the facts, ma'am wrote:

"Trump hit net gain multiples 'close to 4800' 20 times in only 2.5 hours of counting on the first day. This is statistically impossible and a clear indication of fraud."

(Bidens 17 we're over 6 days. The fraud slow game I guess.)

You seem relatively technically proficient, so maybe you can sincerely answer this question.

There does seem to be something anomalous with this data, but the anomy doesn't favor one candidate over the other.

Essentially, the percent vote shares for Biden and Trump are all very close to multiples of 0.1, down to the 10,000ths place. Most of the have the form of 48.5999xxx or 47.3001, etc.

This accounts for the changes "close to" 4800: the number of votes per addition is ~500,000 and Biden%-Trump% is often very close to a multiple of 0.1 (~0.1 *~500,000 = ~4800).

This pattern of the percentage share being very close to a multiple of 0.1 is consistent throughout the entire dataset.

Even more intriguing are the 57 data points in a row where Trump and Biden got exactly the same share of votes, even though the vote total changed. Obviously this is an artefact of how the data was collected and/or processed, but what exactly is the explanation here?

Trump and Rudy raise the white flag.

One day after Rudy said he was about to blow the lid off of machine-facilitated election fraud in GA, Trump's lawyers dropped four election fraud lawsuits in GA.

As an aside, Rudy claimed that in exchange for dropping the lawsuits, GA would be investigating the allegations of election fraud. That was a lie; there was no such agreement and no such investigation will be taking place. Anyone who believes anything that Trump or Rudy say without confirming it from a credible source is a fool.

Rudy at one point said that his claims of fraud were easily provable, but in over two months since the election, he hasn't been to prove anything. Perhaps Trump would have been better off hiring DiscoGary instead of Rudy G.

Having raised a few hundred million dollars, it appears that Trump's focus will now shift from election fraud to staying out of jail.

https://reason.com/2021/01/10/trumps-lawyers-surrender-in-georgia-despite-giulianis-conclusive-proof-of-election-fraud/

Patriot Dad wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Nope. Need to show all the updates in the chart. You're intentionally focusing on the 4,800 exclusively, when its the context of the 17 4,800 series within the larger data set that is statistically impossible.

Hey Gary, we're both Trump supporters here. We're friends. I'm trying just as hard as you to figure out how the radical leftists stole the election.

Help me understand this. Look at just the fact's data. Why did the radical leftists give Trump net increases in votes that were very close to 4800 near the beginning and end of the count if they were trying to help Sleepy Joe steal the election?

What exactly was their strategy? Why would their cheating tacting involve helping the other candidate??

It’ll be clear when I get chart online.

Castro was thought to be the "people's hero" at one time as well. Hmm, how did that turn out. As I have said other times, where is the "beef", is Giuliani holding all that explosive evidence ransom so he can get his $20K an hour fee? What has happened to Powell and all her "evidence".

Bottom line is it amazes my so many people stand behind a guy that has no moral fibber, no backbone, throwing anyone and everyone under the bus so he doesn't look bad to his group, who don't seem to see the light of day.

How about moving on and focusing on important things, like getting rid of this virus so kids can go back to school, compete in track and field and graduate and compete in college before every major college drops track and field.