Capitol Police Chief on J6 spends an hour telling you what happened that day. Yet most of you are so closed-minded and allergic to reality that you won't listen and just blindly downvote this stunning interview.
Ep. 15 Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund reveals what really happened on January 6th. Our Fox News interview with him never aired, so we invited him back.
Capitol Police Chief on J6 spends an hour telling you what happened that day. Yet most of you are so closed-minded and allergic to reality that you won't listen and just blindly downvote this stunning interview.
Can you at least summarize what you think are the high points and why they matter with respect to the Fake Electors Indictments? That shouldn't be too difficult for you. Like 4-5 sentences.
Actually it is unreasonable to do that. "Felon" is a term that carries specific information, including someone's being judged guilty of a felony in a court of law. Roger Stone is a felon, though he's never served a day in prison; Hillary Clinton is not (so far), and neither is Donald Trump or Joseph Biden (so far).
It is not for you, or me, or any other individual not directly involved in the adjudication of a case, to declare a priori that X is a felon. The justice system does that.
Nice to know you think OJ didn't do it because he doesn't officially have the verdict.
OJ did it according to a civil court. Since you are ignorant of everything you wouldn't know that.
Biden had no clearance to have them in the first place.
Biden stole multiple documents over decades.
Biden left his stolen documents in the care of a crack addict who's known for selling himself to foreign powers including Russia and the CCP.
If Democrats didn't have double standards they wouldn't have any standards at all.
Thank you for agreeing with the facts about Trump.
If Biden is guilty of those things, the republicans can go after him now that they control congress - impeach, criminal investigation, the works. But wait, didn't they control congress, senate, and executive, justice dept and supreme court under Trump and no charges against Biden, H. Clinton, or Obama? Why was that? They must be terribly incompetent.
Republicans don't weaponize the government for political reasons.
If they behaved like liberals do every Democrat in office could be thrown in prison.
Thank you for agreeing with the facts about Trump.
If Biden is guilty of those things, the republicans can go after him now that they control congress - impeach, criminal investigation, the works. But wait, didn't they control congress, senate, and executive, justice dept and supreme court under Trump and no charges against Biden, H. Clinton, or Obama? Why was that? They must be terribly incompetent.
Republicans don't weaponize the government for political reasons.
If they behaved like liberals do every Democrat in office could be thrown in prison.
Republicans don't weaponise government, they simply seek to overthrow it.
This post was edited 14 minutes after it was posted.
Thank you for agreeing with the facts about Trump.
If Biden is guilty of those things, the republicans can go after him now that they control congress - impeach, criminal investigation, the works. But wait, didn't they control congress, senate, and executive, justice dept and supreme court under Trump and no charges against Biden, H. Clinton, or Obama? Why was that? They must be terribly incompetent.
Republicans don't weaponize the government for political reasons.
If they behaved like liberals do every Democrat in office could be thrown in prison.
It's not "weaponizing" government to go after criminals. The current Rs clearly tell us that Biden is a criminal. Those some Rs were around when they could have gone after Biden.
But oh, maybe it's that they KNEW that he was guilty, but they are SO damn principled that they didn't even want the APPEARANCE of going after him for political reasons? Yeah, that must be it. Geez, it sucks when these super-upright Rs (and the country) have to suffer for being so principled. Oh well.
It is kind of weird, though, because those same Rs have absolutely no problem with the monumental appearance of impropriety with Clarence Thomas taking gifts summing to, apparently, 7 figures. Just a weird exception to their principle, I guess.
As a guy who claims to have been in the Army, you might have a clue as to the career-ending implications of your logistics guys taking even a freakin' free toaster (or t-shirt) from a vendor. But a half-million dollar trip to a Supreme Court judge? OK.
What does it take to be a true Trump supporter? You need to believe the following:
Trump declares he won the 2020 election and that Biden became president only through cheating and you believe him.
Trump declares he beat Ted Cruz in his primary but that Cruz cheated to win and you believe him (quite a coincidence right?).
Trump goes months refusing to comply with lawful requests to turn in documents and the FBI legally searches and removes those documents and he tells you they are weaponized against him.
Trump and his team arrange for fake electors to pretend they were elected to vote for trump, not the true winner Biden, and you are okay with that.
Trump does everything legal and illegal to prevent the peaceful transfer of power and you are okay with that.
You think Trump, with his huge tax breaks for the wealthy and his gold plated toilets is looking out for the little guy.
You still think Trump is going to build a wall and have Mexico pay for it.
You are okay with Trump stealing from his charity.
You think Trump University provided a good education.
There is more crazy stuff you have to believe and it goes on and on.
Sometimes it's hard to be a Trumper Givin' all your love to just one man You'll have the bad times And he'll have the good times Doing things that you don't understand But if you love him, you'll forgive him Even though he's hard to understand, And if you love him, oh, be proud of him 'Cause after all, he's just a man
Stand by your man And show the world you love him Keep giving all the love you can, Stand by your man
oh right, this administration is protecting biden... i'm oblvious to that
like the election that magically worked in 2016 when the left was in power, when the left controlled the executive branch, trump won... but somehow in 2020, with Donald Trump at the head of the government, he was convinced now the voting system was broken (under the guidance of his government)
none of it lines up with logic at any level of abstraction.
The evidence that the Obama administration put its thumb on the scale in 2016 is overwhelming.
Anyone who thinks the FBI would let Trump off the hook for the felonies Clinton committed is an abject moron.
Imagine the bed wetting horror Democrats would be going through if Trump just burned all of the documents he had at Mar A Lago. Hillary did this very thing and the FBI just shrugged its shoulders and got back to work trying to make sure Trump wouldn't get elected.
James Comey announced that the FBI was reopening their investigation on Hilary Clinton eleven days before the election. That’s putting their thumb on the scale.
The evidence that the Obama administration put its thumb on the scale in 2016 is overwhelming.
Anyone who thinks the FBI would let Trump off the hook for the felonies Clinton committed is an abject moron.
Imagine the bed wetting horror Democrats would be going through if Trump just burned all of the documents he had at Mar A Lago. Hillary did this very thing and the FBI just shrugged its shoulders and got back to work trying to make sure Trump wouldn't get elected.
James Comey announced that the FBI was reopening their investigation on Hilary Clinton eleven days before the election. That’s putting their thumb on the scale.
On 10/28 in a letter to Congress, Comey said the FBI was reviewing new emails discovered as part of an investigation into Anthony Weiner and were sent or received by Clinton aide Abedin.
This is not re-opening the Clinton investigation. He explained how she committed multiple felonies on July 5th and then declared that no reasonable prosecutor would prosecuted her. Obviously, his reasoning was it would be "unreasonable" to take out the scary orange man's only opposition. At that point he was also quite confident that FBI's work on promoting Russian collusion was going to be sufficient to make the election go the way they wanted.
The younger Trumps already sat for deposition testimony, which a federal judge said will be admissible evidence as the fraud suit against the elder Trump heads to trial next January.
Adolt, your responses don't refute Trump's criminal activity. You just point to other figures as being the same or worse. That won't work as a criminal defense for his lawyers either.