Did the left get as outraged about the Steve Scalese shooting? How many pages on LR did it garner?
Only 10 pages because there were only two posts doubting that Scalise had been shot and only a handful that questioned if the shooter had been rabidly anti-Trump.
Biden’s final pitch to the American people before the election is that a nudist communist illegal alien who attacked Paul Pelosi is basically the same thing as the Jan 6th “insurrection” and it’s all Trump’s fault.
Biden is a moron and his party deserves its imminent humiliation
Did the left get as outraged about the Steve Scalese shooting? How many pages on LR did it garner?
Only 10 pages because there were only two posts doubting that Scalise had been shot and only a handful that questioned if the shooter had been rabidly anti-Trump.
Did the left get as outraged about the Steve Scalese shooting? How many pages on LR did it garner?
Only 10 pages because there were only two posts doubting that Scalise had been shot and only a handful that questioned if the shooter had been rabidly anti-Trump.
Probably because it happened in broad, in public, with a crowd of witnesses.
Joy Reid is very unattractive and dumb as a post. Owens could make much more money on the left.
Owens isn't "far right".
Imagine trying to find out what sort of person a man is by asking his ex-wife's best friend, who never even met the man.
Everything you know about her is a caricature from the left.
I disagree. I think she says what she says for the money. She stands out as Black, Millennial far right media personality. She's someone the anti-wokers can go to when they want a Black person to tell them that the deck hasn't been stacked against non-white people for centuries. And they'll pay her.
As far as her not being part of the far right, who would you call far right? Mussolini? Maybe?
Your opinion has no basis other than the racist belief that any black person who doesn't agree with your own politics must be a token or a fool.
She's never said the deck wasn't stacked against minorities in the past.
Are you lying about her views intentionally or are you just ignorant?
And Mussolini was a proud socialist and very much a leftist.
You don't know any position Owens holds. How could you possibly tell where she falls on the spectrum??
Candace discovered how easy it would be to be famous on the right. That’s all she cares about.
You act like she's the only black conservative, or even the first female black conservative. Shows how much liberals like to stereotype black people.
You have the single worst intelligence to argumentative ability ratio on this website. You don't seem dumb, but literally every argument you make is the dumbest thing I read on a given day. I act like she's the only black conservative? By stating that's it's easier for her to gain a following on the right? Basically you've conflated lessened competition with no competition. Like if I said, Shaq played basketball because his body size enabled him to be great, you'd say, "you act as if there's no other 7 foot tall people in the world."
Candace discovered how easy it would be to be famous on the right. That’s all she cares about.
Why do all Democrats think everyone is as shallow as they are?
I don't think everyone is shallow. For example, TheAdultInTheRoom is not shallow. He genuinely believes what he is saying and has moral grounding in his beliefs.
Candace Owens, on the other hand, does not. She's a grifter who looked stupid on Joe Rogan. Maybe the easiest interview on the planet and she looked so dumb and basically whined about being asked questions. It was pathetic.
Only 10 pages because there were only two posts doubting that Scalise had been shot and only a handful that questioned if the shooter had been rabidly anti-Trump.
Probably because it happened in broad, in public, with a crowd of witnesses.
no, it's because american right wingers are paranoid crazy people who see conspiracy everywhere despite being proven wrong every freaking time.
pizzagate. birtherism. 9-11 troofing. hillary kill list. hillary is dying. benghazi. stolen elections. Paul pelosi was attacked by a leftist gay prostitute.
american right wingers are crazy, there is no reasoning with them, they will end our democracy out of ignorance and the need to be entertained.
Why do all Democrats think everyone is as shallow as they are?
For example, TheAdultInTheRoom is not shallow. He genuinely believes what he is saying and has moral grounding in his beliefs.
You are far too kind to him. The only genuine belief or principle that guy has is that he needs to impulsively dispute every single thing he even perceives to be left or liberal, whether it actually is or not. That results in him contradicting himself a good portion of the time -- he's all over the place. There is nothing in depth, genuine or grounded with that rage-a-holic nutter.
Why do all Democrats think everyone is as shallow as they are?
I don't think everyone is shallow. For example, TheAdultInTheRoom is not shallow. He genuinely believes what he is saying and has moral grounding in his beliefs.
I’d think it possible to be shallow and genuinely believe with all the heft of moral grounding, for example, that wives belong in the kitchen and should blow their heteronormative husbands on a regular basis.
Why do all Democrats think everyone is as shallow as they are?
I don't think everyone is shallow. For example, TheAdultInTheRoom is not shallow. He genuinely believes what he is saying and has moral grounding in his beliefs.
Candace Owens, on the other hand, does not. She's a grifter who looked stupid on Joe Rogan. Maybe the easiest interview on the planet and she looked so dumb and basically whined about being asked questions. It was pathetic.
I'd bet money you only saw snippets of her on Rogan that were specifically chosen because they made her look bad.
If you're talking about the climate change nonsense you only think she looked dumb because you don't know anything about climate change and you follow the left's narrative because it's all you've been exposed to.
I don't think everyone is shallow. For example, TheAdultInTheRoom is not shallow. He genuinely believes what he is saying and has moral grounding in his beliefs.
Candace Owens, on the other hand, does not. She's a grifter who looked stupid on Joe Rogan. Maybe the easiest interview on the planet and she looked so dumb and basically whined about being asked questions. It was pathetic.
I'd bet money you only saw snippets of her on Rogan that were specifically chosen because they made her look bad.
If you're talking about the climate change nonsense you only think she looked dumb because you don't know anything about climate change and you follow the left's narrative because it's all you've been exposed to.
Unfortunately I listened to the whole thing. I used to listen to Joe a lot more around that time. She came off very disingenuous to me. And immature. And insecure. So I think you owe me money now. It's not that her stance on climate change was wrong. It's that she couldn't defend it and basically whined about not being able to defend it. I mean of course I think it's wrong too, but her attempt to defend it was atrocious.
For example, TheAdultInTheRoom is not shallow. He genuinely believes what he is saying and has moral grounding in his beliefs.
You are far too kind to him. The only genuine belief or principle that guy has is that he needs to impulsively dispute every single thing he even perceives to be left or liberal, whether it actually is or not. That results in him contradicting himself a good portion of the time -- he's all over the place. There is nothing in depth, genuine or grounded with that rage-a-holic nutter.
Did the left get as outraged about the Steve Scalese shooting? How many pages on LR did it garner?
Um . . . do you have any security camera video of this alleged shooting? Medical records of Scalise? Why haven't those been released? Who let the alleged suspect in the dugout? Why has this evidence been withheld from the public? Why were so many people allegedly on a softball field at 6am, including "lobbyists"? We are expected to believe that the alleged suspect fired 70 rounds from a pistol and a SKS rifle into a crowded softball field and didn't kill a single person?
Do we even have a confession of the alleged suspect? Oh I forgot, the cops conveniently pumped 20 rounds into the alleged suspect and snuffed him out in an extra-judicial killing before he could spill the beans on the operation. So we won't get any alleged confession, will we? Law enforcement made sure of that. Why?
I bet I could find a Youtube video where someone asks these simple questions. Why isn't that part of the official media story we have been given?
We are entitled to know the answers to these obvious questions.
Why do you support keeping the public in the dark?
Do you have any guesses as to what any of the answers may be?
I'd bet money you only saw snippets of her on Rogan that were specifically chosen because they made her look bad.
If you're talking about the climate change nonsense you only think she looked dumb because you don't know anything about climate change and you follow the left's narrative because it's all you've been exposed to.
Unfortunately I listened to the whole thing. I used to listen to Joe a lot more around that time. She came off very disingenuous to me. And immature. And insecure. So I think you owe me money now. It's not that her stance on climate change was wrong. It's that she couldn't defend it and basically whined about not being able to defend it. I mean of course I think it's wrong too, but her attempt to defend it was atrocious.
You think any black person who isn't a Democrat is either doing it for the money or is too stupid to understand what they're saying. OF COURSE you thought she was disingenuous...
She looked at the evidence and came away skeptical of the narrative.
You are far too kind to him. The only genuine belief or principle that guy has is that he needs to impulsively dispute every single thing he even perceives to be left or liberal, whether it actually is or not. That results in him contradicting himself a good portion of the time -- he's all over the place. There is nothing in depth, genuine or grounded with that rage-a-holic nutter.
Name a contradiction.
Should be easy for you.
you believe in evidence-free, groundless conspiracies despite calling yourself the 'adult in the room.'
For example, TheAdultInTheRoom is not shallow. He genuinely believes what he is saying and has moral grounding in his beliefs.
You are far too kind to him. The only genuine belief or principle that guy has is that he needs to impulsively dispute every single thing he even perceives to be left or liberal, whether it actually is or not. That results in him contradicting himself a good portion of the time -- he's all over the place. There is nothing in depth, genuine or grounded with that rage-a-holic nutter.
The need to dispute and debate isn't really a principle. More of a passion. A character trait. Maybe a flaw.
probably all the classic m'aga garbage. But you must be entertained!
I've never said he wasn't attacked.
There's evidence the 2020 election was stolen.
No rational human being can look at how states like Pennsylvania or Michigan ran the 2020 election and think it was a clean election.
If Trump had won in 2020 in the exact manner Biden did idiots like you would be beating old women with 2x4's in the streets like you did over the BLM nonsense.