Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Trollminator wrote:

Flybang mosh wrote:

We need reaffirmation of the concept: "America - love it or leave it".

The only way to truly defeat liberalism is to press liberals hard on patriotism. They can't be reasoned with, but they are capable, at times, of stark emotional choices. The modern neo-lib is ruled by their transient emotions and a big bag of degenerate appetites. Make today's liberal choose between loving America and disliking it. Rub their faces in it. It's the only way they will learn about America's greatness and freedom.

^and sally goes home devastated! How’s that sore a$$ you loser? Still think trump won? Bahahahhaa

Thanks for responding, Sasquatch. Balloon boy. Balloon boy with the hefty fat pants and the yellow socks.

The bottom line, Trollfish, is that you can’t win. The indomitable spirit of America will conquer you smelchitude. As Keith Richards once reflected on liberals: “I wasn’t looking real good, but I was feeling real well.”

Flybang mosh wrote:

We need reaffirmation of the concept: "America - love it or leave it".

The only way to truly defeat liberalism is to press liberals hard on patriotism. They can't be reasoned with, but they are capable, at times, of stark emotional choices. The modern neo-lib is ruled by their transient emotions and a big bag of degenerate appetites. Make today's liberal choose between loving America and disliking it. Rub their faces in it. It's the only way they will learn about America's greatness and freedom.

Nice one. Got a little chuckle out of that!

Good job!

Flybang mosh wrote:

We need reaffirmation of the concept: "America - love it or leave it".

The only way to truly defeat liberalism is to press liberals hard on patriotism. They can't be reasoned with, but they are capable, at times, of stark emotional choices. The modern neo-lib is ruled by their transient emotions and a big bag of degenerate appetites. Make today's liberal choose between loving America and disliking it. Rub their faces in it. It's the only way they will learn about America's greatness and freedom.

Okay. Let's start with the people who are waiving the Confederate flag. They can't be reasoned, but at least they can understand the symbolism of waiving the enemy's flag, especially inside a federal government building.

Let them choose between the Confederate States of America and the United States of America. If they choose the former, either deport them (to where, I don't know), or lock them up. We don't need those traitors in our country.

FYI: "waving"

Butch Bowers has bailed. He was slated to be DJT's lead attorney in the impeachment trial, which is now just over a week away.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-attorneys-part-ways-with-legal-team/?fbclid=IwAR2KwOZzJO56HVuFW4jMgGfKOXaeXM83dfLdEsIzJsBwFEhuk2DpgkeaKXM

Ivyguy wrote:

Butch Bowers has bailed. He was slated to be DJT's lead attorney in the impeachment trial, which is now just over a week away.

Not just Bowers has bailed. FIVE Trump impeachment lawyers have bailed. It seems they want to get paid (retainers) in advance, and signed agreements under their terms. Oh, well.

Trump won't pay to play wrote:

Ivyguy wrote:

Butch Bowers has bailed. He was slated to be DJT's lead attorney in the impeachment trial, which is now just over a week away.

Not just Bowers has bailed. FIVE Trump impeachment lawyers have bailed. It seems they want to get paid (retainers) in advance, and signed agreements under their terms. Oh, well.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/30/politics/butch-bowers-deborah-barbier-trump-impeachment-team/index.html

No, it had nothing to do with fees. Trump wanted them argue that election fraud cost him the election.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Trump won't pay to play wrote:

Not just Bowers has bailed. FIVE Trump impeachment lawyers have bailed. It seems they want to get paid (retainers) in advance, and signed agreements under their terms. Oh, well.

No, it had nothing to do with fees. Trump wanted them argue that election fraud cost him the election.

You have never hired an attorney, have you? Lying is not as big a deal if the price is right. Trump signed no representation agreements, and did not pay any of them. Their loss.

Trump won't pay to play wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

No, it had nothing to do with fees. Trump wanted them argue that election fraud cost him the election.

You have never hired an attorney, have you? Lying is not as big a deal if the price is right. Trump signed no representation agreements, and did not pay any of them. Their loss.

If the price is right, any self-respecting attorney is willing to be come the next Giuliani? Only inferior attorneys would do it.

More on Trump not wanting attorneys who want actually want to get paid. He may represent himself since Senate Republicans are loath to convict him.

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1355724606926151684

SDSU Aztec wrote:

If the price is right, any self-respecting attorney is willing to be come the next Giuliani? Only inferior attorneys would do it.

Trump may represent himself.

Trump won't pay to play wrote:

More on Trump not wanting attorneys who want actually want to get paid. He may represent himself since Senate Republicans are loath to convict him.

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1355724606926151684

Trump is saying that if they won't argue that the election was stolen, there's no point in paying a huge legal fee. The dispute is over strategy and not money.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Trump won't pay to play wrote:

More on Trump not wanting attorneys who want actually want to get paid. He may represent himself since Senate Republicans are loath to convict him.

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1355724606926151684

Trump is saying that if they won't argue that the election was stolen, there's no point in paying a huge legal fee. The dispute is over strategy and not money.

Fantastic. He should represent himself, he’d do great for the Dems! Of course there is no way the GOP will allow that. They will foot the bill and find a willing attorney if needed. Trump is gritting the GOP, LOLz.

What, now you're babbling about Trump's attorneys? He doesn't even need attorneys, his acquittal is guaranteed.

All the important issues that you insisted Biden had to be elected for, and you're ignoring them all. For shame! Proving over and over that all you really want is entertainment. You're just in it for the arguing!

Bad Wigins wrote:

What, now you're babbling about Trump's attorneys? He doesn't even need attorneys, his acquittal is guaranteed.

All the important issues that you insisted Biden had to be elected for, and you're ignoring them all. For shame! Proving over and over that all you really want is entertainment. You're just in it for the arguing!

Still nursing your sore a$$hole I see. More to come ???

Bad Wigins wrote:

What, now you're babbling about Trump's attorneys? He doesn't even need attorneys, his acquittal is guaranteed.

All the important issues that you insisted Biden had to be elected for, and you're ignoring them all. For shame! Proving over and over that all you really want is entertainment. You're just in it for the arguing!

I have no idea if "a list" existed, and if it did, what was on it. But here's what the FULL list should have looked like:

1) Anyone but Trump, or a Trumpian R. No single policy issue CAME CLOSE.

That was accomplished, and NO ONE is ignoring it.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

As crazy as she [Greene] is, she'll never be able to provoke an attack on the Capitol.

I wouldn't be so sure about that. Every day she gains more and more credibility with the wing nuts.

The farce is strong with this one.

Fat hurts wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

As crazy as she [Greene] is, she'll never be able to provoke an attack on the Capitol.

I wouldn't be so sure about that. Every day she gains more and more credibility with the wing nuts.

The farce is strong with this one.

like the GOP absorbed the radical points of

Norquist

Gingrich

Tea Party

Trump

They will absorb the radical points of QAnon. They have base of terrified and scared people who use politics for entertainment. Whereas the Dems use politics to improve the make a better union. So the GOP can't pull back from Greene and Trump...it would be like firing the star of a TV show. Doing so would be bad for the ratings, so why do it?

Fat hurts wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

As crazy as she [Greene] is, she'll never be able to provoke an attack on the Capitol.

I wouldn't be so sure about that. Every day she gains more and more credibility with the wing nuts.

The farce is strong with this one.

She's more freak show than persuasive. Her Twitter account has 300K followers compared to the 88M Trump used to have and most of them probably mock her. If she gave a rally, she would be lucky if more than 100 people showed up.