The suspect has pleaded not guilty and (presumably) is headed for a jury trial.
In such circumstances a court would almost always avoid releasing any evidence to the general public, to avoid potentially prejudicing the jury pool.
But you know that. And so, since the camera footage is not likely to be available until much later, it has become your current set of goalposts.
If the footage were somehow released tomorrow, you would ask for something else--because it's likely that the footage would support the police summary of events, and thus would not show what you want to be true.
It's like a life lesson for younger posters. "See? Look at these clowns. See what happens when you dabble in hysteria and dark fruitcake conspiracy theory? Now put that DiPape manifesto down before your hurt somebody."
You have provided zero evidence of a search at DePape’s residence.
It doesn't matter if I provided evidence of a search at the DePapal residence (and I did provide evidence multiple times - paragraphs 16 and 17 of the Criminal Complaint filed 10/31/22). YOU typed this:
"No residence search at DePape’s"
THAT is a lie, whether I provided evidence or not.
Isaid NOTHING about Google Street View.
Now you are doubling down on a lie.
You were directed to DiPapal's address and house in Richmond, CA and told that, despite recent claims, were no BLM signs or rainbow banners to be seen on his house on Google Street View. YOU then typed this:
"Google street view only comes every 5-10 years" (and then called me "Dumbazz")
THAT is a lie. Google Street View of DiPapal's house is from JUNE, 2022.
You also typed this:
"No statements from DePape lawyers"
THAT is a lie. DiPapal's lawyer Adam Lipson provided statements in court and to the media.
You have ZERO credibility under your current name or any other ones. The reason you have zero credibility is because YOU are a liar.
The suspect has pleaded not guilty and (presumably) is headed for a jury trial.
In such circumstances a court would almost always avoid releasing any evidence to the general public, to avoid potentially prejudicing the jury pool.
But you know that. And so, since the camera footage is not likely to be available until much later, it has become your current set of goalposts.
If the footage were somehow released tomorrow, you would ask for something else--because it's likely that the footage would support the police summary of events, and thus would not show what you want to be true.
That’s BS.
And your reference to the video “likely” not showing what some people want, is evidence of your bias.
You have provided zero evidence of a search at DePape’s residence.
It doesn't matter if I provided evidence of a search at the DePapal residence (and I did provide evidence multiple times - paragraphs 16 and 17 of the Criminal Complaint filed 10/31/22). YOU typed this:
"No residence search at DePape’s"
THAT is a lie, whether I provided evidence or not.
Isaid NOTHING about Google Street View.
Now you are doubling down on a lie.
You were directed to DiPapal's address and house in Richmond, CA and told that, despite recent claims, were no BLM signs or rainbow banners to be seen on his house on Google Street View. YOU then typed this:
"Google street view only comes every 5-10 years" (and then called me "Dumbazz")
THAT is a lie. Google Street View of DiPapal's house is from JUNE, 2022.
You also typed this:
"No statements from DePape lawyers"
THAT is a lie. DiPapal's lawyer Adam Lipson provided statements in court and to the media.
You have ZERO credibility under your current name or any other ones. The reason you have zero credibility is because YOU are a liar.
Post the link, bud.
Why is this so hard for you? I’m asking you to post the link.
You have provided zero evidence of a search at DePape’s residence.
It doesn't matter if I provided evidence of a search at the DePapal residence (and I did provide evidence multiple times - paragraphs 16 and 17 of the Criminal Complaint filed 10/31/22). YOU typed this:
"No residence search at DePape’s"
THAT is a lie, whether I provided evidence or not.
Isaid NOTHING about Google Street View.
Now you are doubling down on a lie.
You were directed to DiPapal's address and house in Richmond, CA and told that, despite recent claims, were no BLM signs or rainbow banners to be seen on his house on Google Street View. YOU then typed this:
"Google street view only comes every 5-10 years" (and then called me "Dumbazz")
THAT is a lie. Google Street View of DiPapal's house is from JUNE, 2022.
You also typed this:
"No statements from DePape lawyers"
THAT is a lie. DiPapal's lawyer Adam Lipson provided statements in court and to the media.
You have ZERO credibility under your current name or any other ones. The reason you have zero credibility is because YOU are a liar.
When it comes to releasing security video, I think it would be stupid, for security reasons to release video that shows anything about the Pelosi residence that can't be seen from google maps. For example, I see no reason to release, outside the context of the actual trial, video from inside the Pelosi house. And were that video to be shown to a jury, I would show it in private and block the public view. Since there are too many people who want to hunt Nancy. Why show them the inside of her house. But likely nothing would be hurt by dropping the tabloids a short clip of the back door being smashed in. Since the picture of the back yard is already well circulated. But it wouldn't be real odd if the face of the smasher was a bit obscured on the security video. The story will come out in time. Obviously near everything can be faked and spun. But what would be the advantage to the Pelosi's to have video footage from inside their house all over the internet?
WAY down on the list of things that police investigators and prosecutors are worried about is monitoring conspiracy theories on the internet and trying to address them. They'd need to set up a whole department and methodology to handle that unending chore. To what end?
For reasons too numerous and obvious to mention, police and prosecutors have decades (centuries?) old policies and rules that significantly limit disclosure of evidence during ongoing investigations. You can't be an adult in the US without having seen hundreds of police/prosecutor press conferences and press releases where some spokesman repeats the mantra that they cannot disclose any more details at this time during an ongoing investigation.
The conspiracy twits here - Adult, Carmine, Kobbs - have only very recently come to the belief that police failure to disclose key evidence in an ongoing investigation can only mean that a massive felony cover up involving multiple law enforcement agencies is taking place. Is this going to be an ongoing demand of theirs in all criminal investigations, or maybe just limited to this particular investigation? Even they know the answer to that question.
It doesn't matter if I provided evidence of a search at the DePapal residence (and I did provide evidence multiple times - paragraphs 16 and 17 of the Criminal Complaint filed 10/31/22). YOU typed this:
"No residence search at DePape’s"
THAT is a lie, whether I provided evidence or not.
Now you are doubling down on a lie.
You were directed to DiPapal's address and house in Richmond, CA and told that, despite recent claims, were no BLM signs or rainbow banners to be seen on his house on Google Street View. YOU then typed this:
"Google street view only comes every 5-10 years" (and then called me "Dumbazz")
THAT is a lie. Google Street View of DiPapal's house is from JUNE, 2022.
You also typed this:
"No statements from DePape lawyers"
THAT is a lie. DiPapal's lawyer Adam Lipson provided statements in court and to the media.
You have ZERO credibility under your current name or any other ones. The reason you have zero credibility is because YOU are a liar.
I’ve posted under handle, bud.
You have some serious issues.
These are a sampling of lies you posted. Obvious and demonstrable lies that you posted.
1. "No statements from DePape lawyers"
2. "No residence search at DePape’s"
3. "Google street view only comes every 5-10 years"
We are interested in why you would post obvious and demonstrable lies like the ones above. You have no credibility at all.
P.S. You will run out of whatever you need to keep registering my name/handle, before I run out of letters to use at the end of my handle. And you say I have issues? You are setting new records in weirdo.
The suspect has pleaded not guilty and (presumably) is headed for a jury trial.
In such circumstances a court would almost always avoid releasing any evidence to the general public, to avoid potentially prejudicing the jury pool.
But you know that. And so, since the camera footage is not likely to be available until much later, it has become your current set of goalposts.
If the footage were somehow released tomorrow, you would ask for something else--because it's likely that the footage would support the police summary of events, and thus would not show what you want to be true.
Often criminal defendants receive the best deal waiting until pre-trial. Since well over 90% of U.S. criminal defendants enter guilty plea, assume all criminal defendants in U.S. will plea guilty and be surprised by cases that go to trial.
It doesn't matter if I provided evidence of a search at the DePapal residence (and I did provide evidence multiple times - paragraphs 16 and 17 of the Criminal Complaint filed 10/31/22). YOU typed this:
"No residence search at DePape’s"
THAT is a lie, whether I provided evidence or not.
Now you are doubling down on a lie.
You were directed to DiPapal's address and house in Richmond, CA and told that, despite recent claims, were no BLM signs or rainbow banners to be seen on his house on Google Street View. YOU then typed this:
"Google street view only comes every 5-10 years" (and then called me "Dumbazz")
THAT is a lie. Google Street View of DiPapal's house is from JUNE, 2022.
You also typed this:
"No statements from DePape lawyers"
THAT is a lie. DiPapal's lawyer Adam Lipson provided statements in court and to the media.
You have ZERO credibility under your current name or any other ones. The reason you have zero credibility is because YOU are a liar.
Post the link, bud.
Why is this so hard for you? I’m asking you to post the link.
Why on earth would I post the link to the federal Criminal Complaint filed against DiPape just because you asked for it?
Everyone, and I mean everyone, in this thread who has an interest in reading the Criminal Complaint has already clicked a link and read it. Why would I go through the effort, as tiny as it is, to post a link to the federal Criminal Complaint filed against DiPape because you ask for it?
Whether I post it or not, you still lied when you posted: "No residence search at DePape’s." There's no fixing that now. You lied.
The very fact that these mental giants have this thing all figured out to be a conspiracy and haven’t even read the formal criminal document should tell you whether you should be wasting your time responding to them vs simply laughing and ridiculing.
The very fact that these mental giants have this thing all figured out to be a conspiracy and haven’t even read the formal criminal document should tell you whether you should be wasting your time responding to them vs simply laughing and ridiculing.
Indeed. I'm fascinated at the behavior and level delusion and vitriol these guys possess.
There is a reasonable likelihood that the infamous DiscoGary (the original from the 2010s) is none other than Adult in the Room Diapers. Similar posting style, level of obsession and sense of aggrievement, as well as similar tendency to paint the broadest swath possible--either you are with him/them or you are a very terrible Dem and liberal. The biggest difference was Gary's true paranoia, which was almost scary. But I think that's what got him banned, because he was such a scared coward that he started lashing out and threatening people. lol Gary the buffoon.
Now carmine is simply a different beast. While Adult and Gary or Adult/Gary are pathetic and laughable, carmine is truly vile if not reptilian. Kind of a Stephen Miller type. Still fun to poke fun at, and mock. I mean what a DB.
Anyway, these guys are twisted and demented. Something seriously mentally wrong with them to post political conspiracy crap all day on a relatively obscure running site while acting like they are pundits who see the true path to enlightenment. Weird. Funny but weird.
A former cop breaks down the entire incident. He has over 2M subscribers.
Why was it deemed a "wellness check" at first & not a "crime?"
Did a third party make an original call?
A neighborhood "eyewitness" SECURITY man reported he saw a man dressed in all black with a duffle bag walking in the neighborhood. Why didn't he call police?
If Depape was walking around in his underwear in the neighborhood, how could this security man MISS seeing him?
If Depape broke the glass (outward) to supposedly break-in, his arm must have been the length of a python to reach the door to unlock it.
He lays out the scenarios out in such a way that the official story is 100% suspect.
Now right wingers are posting hard right youtubers as proof that their debunked conspiracies still have legs. What does that tell you? It tells you that LRC right wingers are scanning the internet to find something to help them stop drowning on their debunked idiocy. Anyone with any type of news or journalistic credibility has been forced to abandon the conspiracy angle and now they are left with rando youtubers.
I clicked on that youtuber. He is a right winger with click bait headlines such as how "Candice Owens Schools a liberal". etc, etc.
As a side note. It is always good to remember that the goal of a youtuber is to get you to click on his videos. This guy makes his money because he has figured out how to draw in right wingers effectively. It is painfully obvious as you scan his video titles that you right wingers are his little money making grift.