***explosion outside Kabul airport***

Creepy old man wrote:

Republicans are literally condemning Biden and not the terrorists who attacked the airport. Absolute garbage.

Which Republicans? Every one that I've seen has condemned the terrorists. In fact, have you condemned the terrorists? I don't think you have, Creep Old.

Biden deserves condemnation for his handling of the Afghanistan crisis. That's just something you are going to have to learn the hard way.

Holstein biff wrote:

My typo is not as bad as your inability to use the Quote function.

It came out exactly the way I wanted it to. You must be new here because you have no clue to do reply to a post about specific topic points (--) while dropping the [ / quote ] . Learn how to make that work so a reply looks cleaner, is faster to read, easier to reply to, and avoids repeating comments that were made that are buried in nested posted.

Holstein biff wrote:

Which Republicans? Every one that I've seen has condemned the terrorists.

You are seeing them? while playing around with your cows?

Holstein biff wrote:

Creepy old man wrote:

Republicans are literally condemning Biden and not the terrorists who attacked the airport. Absolute garbage.

Which Republicans? Every one that I've seen has condemned the terrorists. In fact, have you condemned the terrorists? I don't think you have, Creep Old.

Biden deserves condemnation for his handling of the Afghanistan crisis. That's just something you are going to have to learn the hard way.

Not seeing her pin any blame on the actual terrorists for the events in any of her tweets.

Guys regardless of politics, lets agree Biden is inept. None of this is unexpected, and unfortunately there is more to come.

You didn't like Trump? I get it, though I'd rather have an a-hole who I know is 100% pro USA than whatever it is we have in the WH now. Not protecting our borders, no longer energy independent, weak in foreign policy?

You wanted it you got it.

And If you are defending the current administration get your talking points in order bc we let the rest of the world know that we are weak, and it's just getting started.

Creepy old man wrote:

Republicans are literally condemning Biden and not the terrorists who attacked the airport. Absolute garbage.

Rs are 100% okay with Americans dying in Kabul. They think that will lead to Trump winning in 2024, AND winning the Senate and House as well.

Rs are 100% okay with anti-vaxxers/anti-maskers giving covid to kids and killing many kids -- even their own kids. They think that will lead to Trump winning in 2024, AND winning the Senate and House as well.

flyingfrog wrote:

Guys regardless of politics, let's agree TRUMP WAS inept TO ALLOW STEPHEN MILLER TO CREATE THE AFGHAN DISASTER ON HIS BEHALF AS A GIFT TO BIDEN.

THIS IS CORRECT.

as planned by trump wrote:

Holstein biff wrote:

My typo is not as bad as your inability to use the Quote function.

It came out exactly the way I wanted it to. You must be new here because you have no clue to do reply to a post about specific topic points (--) while dropping the [ / quote ] . Learn how to make that work so a reply looks cleaner, is faster to read, easier to reply to, and avoids repeating comments that were made that are buried in nested posted.

And yet you are the only one in this 7 page thread who has used that claimed method. And you never used it in any of your other posts where you partially quoted others - you just deleted words, while still properly using the Quote function.

Your claim that what you did was deliberate, rather than just user error, is highly suspect. Looks more like a lie to save face.

There are some grammatical errors in your post above, by the way.

Holstein biff wrote:

My typo is not as bad as your inability to use the Quote function.

as planned by trump wrote:

It came out exactly the way I wanted it to. You must be new her

Holstein biff wrote:

And yet you are the only one in this 7 page thread who has used that claimed method.

You are obviously new here.

surveysays wrote:

not good. wrote:

You’re not embarrassed at how this was handled?

I'm not. Why would I be?

Wow, if you can’t see the catastrophe currently happening that could have been lessened or even avoided altogether, I suppose there’s nothing left to discuss. My suspicion is that you see the tragedy, but are like those weird trumpers that refuse to see the faults, going down with the ship. It’s nonsensical. Kudos to be ride or die, but hubris and continued denial of problems will be a huge aspect of the US’s rapidly progressing downfall. Misplaced priorities and corruption don’t have to be the norm, man. Im obviously never going to get you to see my point of view, but just think about that for a bit. It just doesn’t have to be this way.

as planned by trump wrote:

Creepy old man wrote:

Republicans are literally condemning Biden and not the terrorists who attacked the airport. Absolute garbage.

Rs are 100% okay with Americans dying in Kabul. They think that will lead to Trump winning in 2024, AND winning the Senate and House as well.

Rs are 100% okay with anti-vaxxers/anti-maskers giving covid to kids and killing many kids -- even their own kids. They think that will lead to Trump winning in 2024, AND winning the Senate and House as well.

What are you talking about. I am a Republican (I do not like Trump but I did vote for him because of alternative - I did not vote for him in Primaries 2016). This attack is absolutely disgusting and it saddens me greatly. I would have rather Biden looked like the HERO and sky rocket his popularity than the alternative. It is very unfair to paint all people of a group with the same paint brush.

Likewise - I have been vaxxed, my wife is vaxxed and my teenage son gets his second shot tomorrow - we were advised by his dr to wait due to his asthma.

as planned by trump wrote:

Holstein biff wrote:

Which Republicans? Every one that I've seen has condemned the terrorists.

You are seeing them? while playing around with your cows?

Yes. I have a smart phone. I can post and watch videos of Republican politicians condemning terrorists on it. And I'm not playing with cows. I'm drawing blood from them, for later lab analysis.

You used the Quote function correctly this time, it should be noted. Didn't use your superior (now debunked) method that looks all sketchy and wonked out. You know what I'm talking about.

as planned by trump wrote:

Holstein biff wrote:

My typo is not as bad as your inability to use the Quote function.

as planned by trump wrote:

It came out exactly the way I wanted it to. You must be new her

Holstein biff wrote:

And yet you are the only one in this 7 page thread who has used that claimed method.

You are obviously new here.

The format of those looks nothing like the format of this earlier post by you in quotation marks (" "), below.

"[quote]Holstein biff wrote:

Sorry, I was interrupted by one of my cows.

-- A jealous cow? Devin, is that you?

we are trying to "score political points " precisely because US soldiers are denying.

-- Denying what?"

You are digging a hole, Snead. It's Nation Time!

flyingfrog wrote:

And If you are defending the current administration get your talking points in order bc we let the rest of the world know that we are weak, and it's just getting started.

There still hasn't been one cogent response regarding what Biden should be doing differently. It's just accusations of incompetence. All the people who wanted out of forever wars under Trump are now arguing that we should have stayed, which means renewing the war and re-escalating the conflict. All these people who ignored the violence and mass death year after year after year are now outraged at the violent scenes in the Kabul airport, and apparently think that unleashing MORE violence in response will offer some kind of fix to a situation that's been hopeless for 15 years.

Stop saying "we look weak" and start saying what you really mean: "we should re-escalate our military involvement in Afghanistan and send over more American soldiers and more American tax dollars without any kind of endgame whatsoever."

Holstein biff wrote:

blah, blah, blah

You are obviously new here.

I'm sorry but this one can't be pinned on Trump. Biden reversed every Trump action EXCEPT this one.

They couldn't have planned a worse exit. I agree we should exit, but this was the worst way. Just a few weeks ago Biden was saying there's no way the Taliban can take over. He was lying,

Biden was literally on vacation as this was going down. The press secretary took a vacation during it too. They aren't answering questions. They still have no plan to get people home.

DC guy wrote:

I'm sorry but this one can't be pinned on Trump

You are wrong.

as planned by trump wrote:

Holstein biff wrote:

Shish, boom, bah

You are obviously new here. And I hope you stay, because I need help with the quality of my posting.

I'll consider it. And I agree, you post like a B-lister. Maybe we can improve your game, loosen you up.

Holstein biff wrote:

The demands are that Harris resign along with Biden. That would make a lot more sense and be safer for the entire country.

If Biden sees he might be removed from office, his duty would be to resign and require Harris to do the same. It will be a complete disaster if Harris ever became president. Thinking liberals don't even trust her.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-resignation-impeachment-calls

So they want Pelosi to become President?

Below is the current line of succession for the President of the United States:

No. Office[3] Incumbent Party

1 Vice President Kamala Harris Democrat

2 Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi Democrat

3 President pro tempore of the Senate Patrick Leahy Democrat

4 Secretary of State Antony Blinken Democrat

5 Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen Democrat

6 Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin Democrat

7 Attorney General Merrick Garland Democrat

8 Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland Democrat

9 Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack Democrat

10 Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo Democrat

11 Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh Democrat

12 Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra Democrat

13 Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Marcia Fudge Democrat

14 Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg Democrat

– Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm[A] Democrat

15 Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona Democrat

16 Secretary of Veterans Affairs Denis McDonough Democrat

– Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas[B] Democrat