Harambe wrote:
ohhh Yeahhh wrote:
3. Forensic audit of the machines. Many 3rd party companies have the ability to do this and was already done in Michigan. In which, they came back and said the machines are extremely susceptible to fraud. Michigan refuses to release the logs.
This has already been done I recently discovered.
As has a signature matching audit:
https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/cobb-county/gbi-finishes-signature-audit-cobb-county-finds-only-two-mismatches/ON42CSQBORHYJDBGZKKMPC3YAQ/So yeah... uhhh... what are you mad about?
I haven't looked at this to be honest. But let me ask you, have you heard the other side of what they think of it? I would start there. If it is good, ,then GOOD!! Should have been done 45 days ago. But I sincerely doubt it is what they say it is imo. But that doesn't change what the Amistad project came up with.
Have you read the Amistad's report on the fraudulent ballots? They actually have the names of the ballots that are invalid. There isn't even a need to do anything but look at their evidence.
In GA alone...
1. 395 Double Votes
2. 138,221 Electors voted where they didn't reside (illegal)
3. 20,312 Out of state voters who voted in GA illegally
4. 43,688 - Estimated Rep Voters who mail in ballots were not counted.
5. 20,431 - Ballots requested by a Republican by someone other than that person
There are similar examples in every state. The SOS refuses to look at their evidence. I wonder why. Blue pills anyone?!
Explain those to me?