SeattleSilver wrote:
Wrong. Trump sued the Wisconsin elections commission in Federal Court. The judge, a Republican appointed by Trump, allowed Trump's lawyers to present their case with such evidence that they had. Knowing that spurious allegations could get them fined or suspended, the attorneys presented no arguments or evidence regarding fraud. They also dropped their due process claim, and failed to even argue their equal protection claim. Their argument boiled down to the elections commission's rules went beyond legislative intent (ohh, massive election fraud there!). And maybe that would have given them a hook if their requested relief wasn't so absurd. They only challenged the votes in the two largest Democrat voting counties, and didn't challenge the pro-Trump vote totals in other counties even though those counties followed the same rules.
No, you are wrong.
I wish one of you would have some knowledge of what is going on.
The lawsuit was dismissed cause they said it was too late. Not that there wasn't any evidence. LIKE I SAID.
The courts will not change an election. They want that to be done at the legislator level. Especially when dealing with this type of election. And legislators are not going to admit they F'ed up. Especially the ones who are corrupt in the first place.
Conservative Justice Brian Hagedorn joined the court’s liberal justices in rejecting the lawsuit, with the justice concluding that the challenge comes “long after the last play or even the last game; the (Trump) Campaign is challenging the rulebook adopted before the season began.”
“The Campaign is not entitled to relief, and therefore does not succeed in its effort to strike votes and alter the certified winner of the 2020 presidential election,” he concluded.