365 marathons in a year

How come you are still so fat after 365 daily marathons, Ben?

Asswipe wrote:

You porn addicted freak stop thinking you're sherlock holmes I'm just voicing some reason in this otherqise thread full of retardness.

Don't get mad Ben, simply log your runs correctly using a Garmin that records Cadence and ideally Heart Rate, is that really so hard for a man of your dedication?

Do you see the point that anyone could manually log a 26.2 mile run 365 days in a row and equal your attempt without actually running a step? Would you think that was OK? What if they did it for charity? Would that legitimise it?

Serious question - Do these sort of challenges have any formal arbitrator to whom you have to submit evidence?

Yes, like any claim of any achievement that the individual publicises, anyone who encounters the publicity is entitled to voice reasonable scepticism.

A person making such claims who is genuine is only too willing to prove their assertions using simple measures that require no special skills or intelligence.

Bullshitters on the other hand would just get pissed off.

Loop me in wrote:

Serious question - Do these sort of challenges have any formal arbitrator to whom you have to submit evidence?

Evidence for what you stupid porn addicted type-2 diabetes freak? If you go for a run to your local sex shop do you need to submit any evidence to prove it to anybody? This man is an amatauer running for charity, what does he have to prove?

P1ss off you winner. Read my previous​ posts - I am saying the same as you (albeit with a better standard of written English).

Asswipe wrote:

Evidence for what you stupid porn addicted type-2 diabetes freak? If you go for a run to your local sex shop do you need to submit any evidence to prove it to anybody? This man is an amatauer running for charity, what does he have to prove?

That he isn't asking people to donate based on something he isn't actually doing.

By all means say "I'm raising money for charity, please donate" but don't ask for money based on doing something you can't prove to any reasonable sceptic that you are doing.

You sound fun. Do you ask for proof from everyone you sponsor?

Loop me in wrote:

You sound fun. Do you ask for proof from everyone you sponsor?

Obviously it depends what they are claiming they are doing and whether they have sought publicity and kudos for doing so.

I also have a lot more faith in their being genuine if the funds are collected by Justgiving or similar as there is then no argument as to where the money is going.

Anyone who uses the "How dare you question me or my motives, its for charity" move is automatically suspicious, it would be nice if the world wasn't like this - but it is.

Loop me in wrote:

You sound fun. Do you ask for proof from everyone you sponsor?

Yes I do.

Asswipe wrote:

Loop me in wrote:

Serious question - Do these sort of challenges have any formal arbitrator to whom you have to submit evidence?

Evidence for what you stupid porn addicted type-2 diabetes freak? If you go for a run to your local sex shop do you need to submit any evidence to prove it to anybody? This man is an amatauer running for charity, what does he have to prove?

Ben, you are leeching gear off sponsors and faking your runs:

How is he collecting the sponsorship money? I must have missed that.

Loop me in wrote:

How is he collecting the sponsorship money? I must have missed that.

Yes I was giving credit for that, to show I am not simply slating someone, the problem remains complete lack of evidence of the central claim.

Loop me in wrote:

How is he collecting the sponsorship money? I must have missed that.

Did you not see his big sponsorship page where he gets lots of free gear from companies? He has been actively trying to get sponsors to pay him.

And here's another thought, this Ben guy appears to be jobless. When do you think he actually works a real job between all the traveling and selfies? He is totally going for the Rob Young fake book because of my fake marathons angle.

Just read it now.

I am struggling to find a victim other than the vanity of a few ultrarunners.

I feel the response from LRC is like wolves looking for the next kill - but this guy is not on the level of the other clowns and charlatans.

Asswipe wrote:

Evidence for what you stupid porn addicted type-2 diabetes freak? If you go for a run to your local sex shop do you need to submit any evidence to prove it to anybody? This man is an amatauer running for charity, what does he have to prove?

This is beginning to get entertaining.

The debate was, by LRC standards, balanced and informative for most of this thread. Now that Ben and his supporters have arrived it is descending into insults and accusations. This is a very familiar pattern.

Loop me in wrote:

I feel the response from LRC is like wolves looking for the next kill - but this guy is not on the level of the other clowns and charlatans.

I suspect you miss the point, we are just calling out BS, what is your motivation?

Loop me in wrote:

Just read it now.

I am struggling to find a victim other than the vanity of a few ultrarunners.

I feel the response from LRC is like wolves looking for the next kill - but this guy is not on the level of the other clowns and charlatans.

Be right back. I will type up my response to you after my daily 200 mile run.