Wat? Are you saying "I believe A, I don't doubt it. You say A is true. You have to prove A." That makes no sense
Either way, here it is, packaged nice and neat for you:
Are you reading anything I write? USADA and UKAD have already shown that this is a thorough process. I'm not sure why you are choosing to read so literally that "USADA and UKAD lobbies WADA" no mean that they did absolutely nothing else than sit in the lobby of WADA's office, with no evidence, no science, and no backing.
Here: more, more more, just to make it crystal clear:
Obviously, WADA said that. That's what the whole thread is about! So WADA said "No" louder than UKAD/USADA said "Please?". Well then case closed. No governing body has ever acted defensive when challenged, and never will. It's science. WADA's decisions make truths happen. And that's sarcasm, by the way, because you have trouble reading anything beyond literal meanings.
Remember when I say how often I have to repeat myself?