You Can Run But You Can't Hide Malmo - More And More People Know The Truth About You

At this point we don't really need any really exclusive inside information to tell us whether or not NOP is dirty. Farah just ran freaking 3:28 as a 30 year old 10k guy. It might as well be a flotrack video of Alberto personally sticking the syringe in his arm.

Also, I can't believe A Duck is threatening serious legal action by Nike on this website. If I worked for Nike I would be more concerned with crazy stuff like that than I would be about anything having to do with Malmo.

this is quite the shit storm. myself, i was a walk on at oregon in 78. could not beat out borleau to make the team but collected a few scalps in workouts.

i can say that alsal was a bit of a bully, though how big a bully can a long distance runner be?

one day, by my lonesome i was doing 100m repeats and was getting pissed off with the times, so i ran harder, then al sal comes up and has a shit eating look on his face and challenges me to a sprint race. it was clear it was the top dog pissing on the other dogs that might challenge.

i decided not to attack top dog (boxing was the first thing that came to mind), boxing and sprinting ain't his sport, and al-sal should never ever try either.

another jacass was torensen brock, a 149 800 runner who challenged one time for god knows what reason. now this dude you don't want to mess with. alsal sure, brock, no no no. not unless you have skills.

those are my only 2 negative encounters. cruz, billy, chappa, martin, borleau all fantastic guys. david mac too, a kind guy but he seemed to "have his own ideas". good thing alsal never pissed off gangsta mack, that would be the end.

at the end of the day, it is insecurity that drives the bully. but alsal's insecurity drove him to wins. fear.

at the end of the day, i admire alsal in his perseverance.

he's done a good job. i am sure back in the day there was fringe sports medicine going on, the rules were grey or non existent for a lot of stuff.

i have no scoop on alsal. dmso. that is it.

in any case, what are you suppose to do, with guys like viren injecting "reindeer milk" and the europeans following suit grabbing tricks from the tour de france, with aouita and the rest of the iberian and atlas mountain boys doing coe protocols with the finest "vitamins"

aouita never thought anything of it, thought it was normal, which is was, unless you were in the hinterlands of australia, alabama and such. aouita was shocked to find out that everyone who was anyone was not in the know.,

but if you are talking big bully,consider that nike is going get legal, in a civilized way of course. anyone pssing on nike has to partner with some major law entity or get steam rolled.

Texas Toast wrote:

At this point we don't really need any really exclusive inside information to tell us whether or not NOP is dirty. Farah just ran freaking 3:28 as a 30 year old 10k guy. It might as well be a flotrack video of Alberto personally sticking the syringe in his arm.

3.28 is exactly what Farah should be running at age 30

Compare his 400 time to mine as a 10k runner at age 43 and Mo would run 3.26

I agree with malmo, it's all in your head.

not from oregon wrote:

[quote]malmo wrote:

Why do I need to provide you evidence that Alberto is dirty? I don't have it. Do you?

not from oregon wrote:

If you don't have it what is all the talk about knowing he is dirty and not outing Alberto because of some agreement with him. Then you contradict yourself by saying that you want to have it all out in the open and talk with Nike lawyers and the press.

So, 'Not from Oregon, 'you have a conversation with Joe Runner in which the two of you discuss the drug use/knowledge that each of you have experienced. The two of you know each other and also know the score about what's been going on. You know that you've had the conversation, that's the truth. You know what was said in the conversation, that's also the truth. But... There's no evidence. That doesn't make these things not the truth. George says he has no evidence. Believe him. That doesn't make any of it not true.

J.R. wrote:

I'm 100 percent in favor of registration on the site, as it would be a huge improvement to the present situation. Even if registration was just optional, that would be much better.

crazy raisin wrote:We DO have optional registration here.

It's just that this board software doesn't do much for registered users. I expect they'll upgrade the software to something different in the near future.

Oh, well right but that's just registration of nicknames. I'm talking about the kind of registration where we can subscribe to threads, have a buddy list, send private messages, block people, things like that.

J.R. wrote:

Oh, well right but that's just registration of nicknames. I'm talking about the kind of registration where we can subscribe to threads, have a buddy list, send private messages, block people, things like that.

I keep hoping one day this becomes reality.

J.R. wrote:

I'm 100 percent in favor of registration on the site, as it would be a huge improvement to the present situation.

This^

Listen, I'm no more gangsta than the nerdy kid who grew up in the hood but spent more time in the neighborhood library. But I have enough sense to know that no one does or says the things A Duck says and does without help. It simply doesn't happen. So for folks to begin throwing out names that may not be involved or to make assumptions of who this duck may be, I would encourage you to not do that. This is someone with an agenda and I don't believe duck is working in exclusivity. Anonymously? Yes, for now. But there is something eerily creepy about the obsession and bizarre behaviors that really helps the NOP camp in no way at all.

When I was a kid, there were a lot of gang activities in my neighborhood. One thing I learned from an early age is the first, loudest, and most vocal squirt was only given authorization from a much more powerful source who was the real beast. In other words, duck is only a pawn and is being used by someone else. Either this is true OR he is legitimately emotionally disturbed.

crazy raisin wrote:

jono wrote:

Compare his 400 time to mine as a 10k runner at age 43 and Mo would run 3.26

Explain this please?

Mo's times are proportional to mine at all distances up to half marathon. I see nothing anomalous.

Not sure if I have no life for reading through this thread, or if other posters have no lives for feeding lrc's biggest troll.

All of these accusations are pointless and a waste of time. If people have evidence then expose it. If not then stop posting.

Ask Manzano wrote:

not from oregon wrote:

If you don't have it what is all the talk about knowing he is dirty and not outing Alberto because of some agreement with him. Then you contradict yourself by saying that you want to have it all out in the open and talk with Nike lawyers and the press.

Having knowledge of something, and having evidence of something are two separate things.

Exactly why Malmo would never go before a board of Nike lawyers and the press. Very easy to say those things when you know that will never happen. Might as well have said he will go before Congress.

So you're saying that I shouldn't have called in sick today to follow this soap opera?

joalturn wrote:

Not sure if I have no life for reading through this thread, or if other posters have no lives for feeding lrc's biggest troll.

All of these accusations are pointless and a waste of time. If people have evidence then expose it. If not then stop posting.

not from oregon wrote:

Exactly why Malmo would never go before a board of Nike lawyers and the press. Very easy to say those things when you know that will never happen.

I wouldn't be so sure. I'm sure there are people who could and would corroborate what he's saying. That's what brought Armstrong down.

You don't need Snowden-like documentation to make a case.

It's clear to us all that "not from oregon" and a few others posting are really A Duck in sheep's clothing.

jono wrote:

crazy raisin wrote:

Explain this please?

Mo's times are proportional to mine at all distances up to half marathon. I see nothing anomalous.

Not making assumptions about anyone using or not using, but isn't it possible he could be taking something that would give him fairly proportional improvements across all distances from 400 on up?

sylk rhoad wrote:

jono wrote:

Mo's times are proportional to mine at all distances up to half marathon. I see nothing anomalous.

Not making assumptions about anyone using or not using, but isn't it possible he could be taking something that would give him fairly proportional improvements across all distances from 400 on up?

Comparing Mo's PRs to a 43 year old 10K runner and concluding nothing anomalous is really stupid.

Hopeful Runner wrote:

J.R. wrote:

Oh, well right but that's just registration of nicknames. I'm talking about the kind of registration where we can subscribe to threads, have a buddy list, send private messages, block people, things like that.

I keep hoping one day this becomes reality.

Remember... On this site, only 'Your Dreams Become Reality.'

"I fell in love with the state of Oregon, Oregon’s love for running, Oregon’s passion for the environment, and Nike’s commitment to a global economy. The attack on Nike as the villain in the global environmental and worker issues are mis-directed. I’m proud of the leadership from Oregon and from Nike."

How sure are you of this? Lots of guessing and assuming and conjecturing going on around this thread.