RE: Politics of Boston Bombing Thread

Charlie Freak wrote:

From the looks of this quote...

'...almost immediately the neo-cons nitwits on this site started name calling and slamming liberals.'

...you're much better at being hypocrites as well. The irony on this one is rich. You can't make this stuff up.

Your own ironic quote:

"The reason it's baffling to you is because you're a liberal and you're thinking is messed up"

Criticizing a whole group's thinking abilities while inappropriately using "you're" instead of "your".

Sadly, there is hypocrisy on both sides.

Rah Righty wrote:

So why do Muslims vote 90% Democrat?

Wow, you wingnuts have a special fondness of pulling things out of your unwiped bungholes. You lie even when you know it's obvious to everyone.

My name is Lance wrote:

Baffling?? You're retarded or are seriously lacking in observation skills, as this board was packed with posts all week (until yesterday) about the threat from domestic terroists. There were quite a few liberal assmonkeys determined to believe some white tea party member/Christian Texan was the culprit.

Nice to see the village idiot is still around. Anyone with half a brain has wondered FROM THE BEGINNING whether it was foreign OR domestic terrorists. I know this may surprise you, but despite leaning left my first thought was "foreign terrorist," but since I actually have some critical thinking skills I was also capable of considering other options.

yuiop wrote:

Blah, blah, blah... keep pissing. I actually thought you had some substance earlier. I was mistaken. I hope no one bothers to cut and paste in response, are you really going to continue with the charade that your side hasn't been just as pathetic?

I never said there haven't been some bullsh*t-spewing conservative dummies on this and other threads. I've seen plenty and some have been pretty embarrassing, to be honest. I was replying to a poster who took conservatives to task for making insults and 'bashing liberals', when liberals were just as bad if not worse, which I illustrated quite thoroughly. Glad to clear that up for you.

a speaker of the l wrote:

Charlie Freak wrote:

From the looks of this quote...

'...almost immediately the neo-cons nitwits on this site started name calling and slamming liberals.'

...you're much better at being hypocrites as well. The irony on this one is rich. You can't make this stuff up.

Your own ironic quote:

"The reason it's baffling to you is because you're a liberal and you're thinking is messed up"

Criticizing a whole group's thinking abilities while inappropriately using "you're" instead of "your".

Sadly, there is hypocrisy on both sides.

You point out a grammar mistake to indicate my supposedly flawed thinking? Nice catch (eye roll). You're (your?) reaching, friend.

And you continue to miss the point of his post... "hypocrisy on both sides." It seems as though it hit the bullseye when questioning your reasoning. Why not summarize the bashing from the Muslim-hating, libtard-hating, Obama-hating, left-hating posters and then get back to us.

Voter (now a cynic) wrote:

Maybe we can FINALLY address immigration after this?

The famil of those two idiots are pieces of work in several cases. Why should the US allow such security risks to enter our nation?

How about closing the borders and halting ALL immigration for a decade, counting heads, tossing out the illegals and getting the economy back in order?

...how about making a basic command of the English language a prerequsite to citizenship?

Once we get our OWN house in order, and that's saying something, THEN we can address other things, if ever.

We have plenty of homegrown problems to address without bringing in more.

The majority of immigration law changes that have allowed refugees like this to come into the USA where passed by Republican majorities and Republican Presidents signed off.

Why?

More people equals more consumers for capitalism.

What part of AMERICAN CITIZEN do you not get, you racist moron?

Wait, I am confused. Who is racist? Did somebody say something against the white caucasian bombers (which is their race)?

People are confusing race (which you have zero control over) with religious identity (which one is free to choose). How is being against Islamic Jihadists racist? If somebody does not like Christians, are they also racist?

My name is Lance wrote:

Extreme Liberal - believe in torturing unborn babies to death as a form of b/c.

You appear to be one of the many right-wingers here who is literally incapable of NOT lying at every opportunity.

What part of AMERICAN CITIZEN do you not get, you racist moron?

religious profiling wrote:

Wait, I am confused. Who is racist? Did somebody say something against the white caucasian bombers (which is their race)?

People are confusing race (which you have zero control over) with religious identity (which one is free to choose). How is being against Islamic Jihadists racist? If somebody does not like Christians, are they also racist?

Read the thread. Lance earlier asserted that some brown-skinned people are not "true blue Americans".

[quote]wicker wrote:

...and instead we got a mix. One devout muslim, one mild muslim, both in the country for a while and assimilated. Sounds like the dead guy was the instigator - he says he was devout. The younger, living one was just following. He doesn't seem religious much.

Good for you. You can regurgitate the narrative given to us from the mainstream media. Any thoughts of your own?

Let's be real here: according to Wikipedia, 1.57 BILLION of the world's population is Muslim. What percentage of this population has committed terrorist acts? Yeah, you can try and say they were motivated by Islam, but most Muslims aren't committing acts of terror.

I'm a liberal and HELL YES I was hoping the people involved weren't Muslim:

Crazy white Christian/non-religious person commits an act of violence: no reaction, no ignorant posts on letsrun.com about how barbaric white Christians/non-religious people are, no hate-mongering, no prejudice against sane white Christian/non-religious people.

Crazy non-white or Muslim person commits an act of violence: prejudice against peace-abiding members of that religion/race, ignorant pots on letsrun.com, unproductive hate-mongering.

Before 9/11, the biggest mass killing of Americans was the Jonestown Massacre. Remember that? How much hate did that create against people who look like Jim Jones?

a/ wrote:

What a turd, the photo with the suspect where a "Che Guevera" t-shirt was a photoshopped job.

The Original Picture had the a graphic with the word "B e A T" on it.

ANYONE WHO HAS BEEN ACCURATELY FOLLOWING AND COMMENTING ON THIS STORY KNOWS THAT-

Link please!

Here is the difference.1) You are lumping Christians with non-religious people. That is a ridiculous lump. We may as well say "Muslim / Buddhists" and throw two groups with completely different beliefs together. You simply cannot do that. Christians and non-religious people do not have the same religious views, just like Muslims and Buddhists do not have the same religious views. Tim McVeigh was an agnostic. If we group people of different religious viewpoints in based on the color of their skin, that is completely dumb and unfounded.2) How many Christians who commit violence are currently specifically do so in the name of Christianity? Did the Jonestown or Columbine or pick a massacre do it in the name of Jesus Christ? Did they? Compare that to the Islamic radicalists. There IS a difference.

awesomeblossom wrote:

Let's be real here: according to Wikipedia, 1.57 BILLION of the world's population is Muslim. What percentage of this population has committed terrorist acts? Yeah, you can try and say they were motivated by Islam, but most Muslims aren't committing acts of terror.

I'm a liberal and HELL YES I was hoping the people involved weren't Muslim:

Crazy white Christian/non-religious person commits an act of violence: no reaction, no ignorant posts on letsrun.com about how barbaric white Christians/non-religious people are, no hate-mongering, no prejudice against sane white Christian/non-religious people.

Crazy non-white or Muslim person commits an act of violence: prejudice against peace-abiding members of that religion/race, ignorant pots on letsrun.com, unproductive hate-mongering.

Before 9/11, the biggest mass killing of Americans was the Jonestown Massacre. Remember that? How much hate did that create against people who look like Jim Jones?

The liberal turd-eater a/ claims that this picture

http://i.imgur.com/cgXdxgY.jpg

was photshopped (by his parents??!!!) into this

http://news.brown.edu/files/images/Tripathi1_0.medium.jpg

and he refuses to admit his mistake and apologize for his rabid name calling.

With your attitude, and links like the one below, something becomes clear:http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/lets_hope_the_boston_marathon_bomber_is_a_white_american/1) Islamic fundamentalists commit acts of terrorism all over the world, time and time again.2) People see a pattern and realize the majority of terrorists (those intentionally seeking to kill and maim innocent civilians) tend to be Islamic.3) Liberals get all huffy and consider this racist and unfair.4) An act of terrorism happens. Liberals immediately hope that this will be committed by non-Islamic individuals, preferably a self-proclaimed Christian, just so they can shout to the world, "see, the Muslims get a bad wrap."5) Not surprisingly, it is Islamic fundamentalists (once again). They further the reputation that they have earned as cold-hearted murderous zealots, further damaging the reputation of their non-violent Muslim counterparts. 6) People call Islamic fundamentalism for what it is, an evil cult, and liberals get upset.

awesomeblossom wrote:

Let's be real here: according to Wikipedia, 1.57 BILLION of the world's population is Muslim. What percentage of this population has committed terrorist acts? Yeah, you can try and say they were motivated by Islam, but most Muslims aren't committing acts of terror.

I'm a liberal and HELL YES I was hoping the people involved weren't Muslim:

Crazy white Christian/non-religious person commits an act of violence: no reaction, no ignorant posts on letsrun.com about how barbaric white Christians/non-religious people are, no hate-mongering, no prejudice against sane white Christian/non-religious people.

Crazy non-white or Muslim person commits an act of violence: prejudice against peace-abiding members of that religion/race, ignorant pots on letsrun.com, unproductive hate-mongering.

Before 9/11, the biggest mass killing of Americans was the Jonestown Massacre. Remember that? How much hate did that create against people who look like Jim Jones?

Racism Police - I agree completely with your point of view.

Proposal to Amend:

Constitution of the United States of America

Amendment XXVIII

All citizens and non-citizens before entering the country, regardless of religion or political affiliation, shall be required to renounce terrorism in all it’s forms.

Pass this on

Is foreign policy compromising the safety of US citizens?

Would foreigners still try to blow us up if we weren't involved in the Israel/Palestine mess or invading countries we consider 'evil' to give them freedom & democracy? Do citizens of those countries actually want that or would they prefer to live as they have for hundreds of years?

Why keep getting involved in other countries problems rather than letting them sort it out themselves?