Yes I know that. I don't quite like persons who are discreetly pro-doping. They fight so hard to present an appearance of anti-doping but nowhere in the interstitial space between pockets of his reasoning and persuading in space and time do I feel AT ALL that he is anti-doping. The converse is rather true of him---a pro-doper and pro-doping.
Didn't El G close the 2004 Olympics in 1:46? Probably the all time most impressive 1500m race.
yeah he did what jakob just did at euros (take it from two laps out and run each 100 slightly faster than the previous one) but even faster. they went out pretty slow in the first half; i think it was 54-55 penultimate lap and 51-52 last lap. GOAT sh!t
What a load of bull bruh!!! Jakob according to Jonathan Gault of LRC closed in 53 at Euros, not 51-52. Josh Kerr will run each 200m segment, rather, SIGNIFICANTLY faster than the previous to beat Jakob in Paris!!!! Running 100m segments slightly faster than the next is pretty anachronistic way of running these days, it's also more exhausting and energy-wasting than running each 200m segment significantly faster than the next. You have more space-time over 200m to relax and chill out and gain a steady rhythm before ramping it up again.
Within your parody response you failed to comprehend or address my points. You lose.
Address what points bruh????
You wanna me to address Nuguse leading and rabbiting as his reason for loss to Hocker and not Hocker doping?
You wanna me to address that Nuguse had a bad day and not Hocker doping?
You are asking me to do things just as subjective as things I already did. I did address that there are 10^100 as many scenarios as they are atoms in the universe for which Nuguse could have lost the race to Hocker but only the ones that I Khamis the RF King identify and filter out are going to matter and be relevant to how Nuguse could have lost to Hocker!!!
Why don't you ask why I didn't say that Grant Fisher could only have beaten Woody Kincaid not because Woody had a bad day or did lots of rabbiting but because Grant Fisher took drugs????? I could just as easily say Grant is on drugs just like Hocker but surprise surprise I didn't??????????
How am I the RF King so RANDOM?????? Or am I rather intelligent, perspicuous with perspicacity, and with sophisticated cognition and spirit?
I know about all these other factors of which you speak of but my perspicacity tells me that they don't matter as much, if at all, as Hocker doping between the Prefontaine classic and the olympic trials. Hocker doping trounces Nuguse bringing the loss upon himself by leading the race and losing some energy. Nuguse didn't lead a particularly very fast race like 3:27/28, in fact it was well on course for a 3:31/3:32 finish if you discount the 52 second last lap which was solely due to the provocation of Hocker. Otherwise, the splits until just before the start of the final lap paints a final race result picture of 3:31/3:32.
Hocker and Nuguse only really went with 250 to go, so it would be more accurate to say that until before the start of the last 250m, the race was on course for a slower finishing time of 3:31/3:32 for Nuguse which is an easy trot for him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You expecting me to think and believe that Nuguse leading such a slow race until just before the last 250m in 3:31/3:32 is supposed to suck so much energy from his body that he cannot prevent Hocker from overtaking him or outkicking him still to the line to win the race at least???????????????? The news report also didn't report any particularly hard blowing hurricane-esque wind either!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It was just a normal day with your regular wind resistance.
But anyway 3:31/3:32 finishing time until just before the last 250m for a 3:43 miler like Nuguse and still losing the race, or, unable to kick 25.xx seconds with Hocker is really very profligate of Nuguse. It's precisely so extravagantly rueful that IT COULDN'T BE NUGUSE FAULT but rather Hocker's. Hocker's drugs rather made Nuguse look profligate otherwise it never should have happened at all and Nuguse would stroll to victory, or, still kick it with Hocker and beat him still!!!!!
Can you see how well I do reason and persuasion by inquiring holistically and susceptibly of all the space and time of the relevant actors and factors here??? Not boasting or anything but this is what I'm born to do, this is MY GIFT!!!!!!!! I'm chosen (by God) to KNOW, and, UNDERSTAND!!!!!
Hope that clears the air!!! Cheers :)
This post was edited 4 minutes after it was posted.
Khamis, there's a poster on here called Rekrunner. You two will get along just fine.
We complement each other in an exclusive way. He is the king of all that is subjective and supernatural and non-objective inter-dimensional space and time, while I restrict myself to the domain that is described by observable and measurable objective realities.
Khamis, there's a poster on here called Rekrunner. You two will get along just fine.
We complement each other in an exclusive way. He is the king of all that is subjective and supernatural and non-objective inter-dimensional space and time, while I restrict myself to the domain that is described by observable and measurable objective realities.
Awesome, love it. You two are one and the same troll for sure. Completely delusional and literally always wrong, while pretending to be logical and supreme.
We complement each other in an exclusive way. He is the king of all that is subjective and supernatural and non-objective inter-dimensional space and time, while I restrict myself to the domain that is described by observable and measurable objective realities.
Awesome, love it. You two are one and the same troll for sure. Completely delusional and literally always wrong, while pretending to be logical and supreme.
This reminds me of all the times Coevett accused me and "casual obsever" of being one in the same troll. Are you Coevett too?
I pretend that everyone is right, to the extent they bring objective facts into the discussion.
