Wait, what? This sounds like something one of those 'wake up, sheeple' influencers would spout off on a podcast or YouTube. But if it's in print you can look at it and see it's a silly logical fallacy. If someone is accused, they are neither guilty nor innocent--YET. And the accuser is neither truthful nor lying. There is no penalty too harsh for those who blame legit victims in order to justify their own misogyny.
You know, all your sh!tposting in an attempt to distract from the fact that Chad has been banned by SafeSport just serves to keep this thread up at the top of LRC.
You know, all your sh!tposting in an attempt to distract from the fact that Chad has been banned by SafeSport just serves to keep this thread up at the top of LRC.
+1
That's in good old letsrun tradition, see the many Salazar and Houlihan threads that kept popping up and being kept alive by 2 "supporters" each using 5 accounts.
Threads about Non-American abusers or dopers die much quicker because of the lack of support, and you certainly don't see any Free Sumgong or Free Cherono threads popping up.
He made an enemy of bosshard, and I am sure they used SafeSport to fight their battles. It's like calling Children's Services on your ex.. no matter how innocent they are, someone will talk about how DCS investigated them for child abuse. That bell cannot be unrung.
Ok mods, we need some fair and balanced discussion here, if these posts declaring Chad a genius are going to be allowed, then I need to be able to call him a douche pimple to balance things out.
There are plenty of smart people who are awful humans. There really isn't a correlation between being smart and being a good human, there is when you are destitute a negative correlation but there is an endless list of high IQ criminals and world leaders. So really doesn't matter if this is true or not it proves nothing