zxvczcxv wrote:
No. But instead of mere speculation, here is some data, which indicates 0.6% serve. Even if you reduce it to the 38.4% reported to police and ask what happens there, only 14.8% of rapes reported to police result in arrest. Of the 5.7% of the total that result in arrest, only 19% are referred for prosecution. At that point conviction rates are pretty high but only a bit more than half serve time, and you're down to 6 out of a 1000, or 6/384 reported to police and 6/57 arrested for rape. There are false accusations and merely questionable disagreements about what happened where no one intended to force sex without consent, but there are also a lot of actual rapes that are unprosecuted.
"Prosecution rate
Based on correlating multiple data sources, RAINN (Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network) estimates that for every 1,000 rapes, 384 are reported to police, 57 result in an arrest, 11 are referred for prosecution, 7 result in a felony conviction, and 6 result in incarceration."
And in your world "not referred for prosecution" ALWAYS means they did it but the judge thought she deserved it?? Is it even conceivable to you that cases are thrown out for lack of evidence or clear evidence contrary to the accusation?