Your stupidity is boundless. There is absolutely no chance to discuss the most easy subjects with you. It's hard to imagine, but it seems you really didn't understand the madness of your argumentation.
I have never said Keino was faster than - for example - Clarke. Clarke has faster PBs than Keino in the 5000m and 10000m, Keino has faster PBs in the 3000m/2 Miles and much better PBs in the 1500m and 800m and has beaten Clarke on the big occasion in 64, 66, 68 and 70 (lost in 62), always in the 3 Miles/5000m, not over 1500m/Mile where there would be no contest at all. But please keep saying Clarke was faster, to expose your stupidity more and more.
Since correct statistics about Kenyan running success for you and your equally mad friend seems like a crucifix for dracula, here is another interesting perspective for both of you:
Looking on the first 8 of each Olympic final in the track distances and awarding points from 8 to 1 (1st place 8 points, 2nd pace 7 points... - homework for both of you: try to complete, difficult enough), here are the summed up numbers for the 1964, 68 and 72 Olympics (in brackets the numbers for 76, where Kenya boycotted - and definitely would have high scored in the 800m and probably also in the steeple)
Kenya - 100 points
USA - 73 points (9)
Great Britain - 35 points (27)
New Zealand - 33 points (23)
Finland - 31 points (21)
Australia - 27 points (1)
Kenya has the most points in the 800m, 1500m (equal to New Zealand), and the steeple.
Armstronglivs: others have won, others have set the records (by far most world records from kenyans) and so on...
Which country was more successful in the period 1964 - 1979 than Kenya? Just name one country. Some more candidates: Albania, Netherlands Antilles, Central African Republic, Cayman Islands, Aruba - which one was it? Or, according to you, more than just one country? Name them.
Looking forward for more self exposition to be the unchallenged idiot of the village. But unchallenged? You have some strong opposition.