And not google searched pics of Pelosi’s place. Where is the video and pics of DePape’s residence being searched?
Well, we know that his residence has already been searched. But what difference to you guys? The searches could be in Technicolor and stereophonic sound, and your response to everything that seems to contradict what you want to be true would still just be some variant of "They staged that! They planted that! Cops are corrupt [except when we say we back the blue]! The FBI is corrupt! MAGÁ!"
Well, we know that his residence has already been searched. But what difference to you guys? The searches could be in Technicolor and stereophonic sound, and your response to everything that seems to contradict what you want to be true would still just be some variant of "They staged that! They planted that! Cops are corrupt [except when we say we back the blue]! The FBI is corrupt! MAGÁ!"
Provide the pics or video… Clown.
Ah yes,some guy on a running forum can provide the pics or video....clown
4. Who opened the door while Pelosi and his assailant wrestled for the hammer.
5. Why was the glass outside the house if there was a break in?
6. Why are we not being shown the cops bodycam video?
7. Why were the cops doing a "wellness check" at the Pelosi house at 2:30 AM.
Anyone?
The libs throw the "conspiracy theorist" card at everybody who questions the narrative about this story, but I have yet to hear the coherent recount of the actual story. The questions Carmine poses are actually reasonable
I'm not saying that this is another Jussie Smollett-type case, but I do want to point out that people (mostly liberals) did believe Smollett's story on its face before it all turned out to be bullsh!t. It's just smart not naively believe everything you hear before evidence is presented, not just hearsay.
You never said that. Why do you lie? Why do you try to turn this thread into your personal den of lies?
Rand Paul got jacked up. All the opinion polls on this issue show that over 80% of respondents consider his beatdown to be justifiable. I don't know about your country, but in America we respect property rights and abhor sissies who can't fight.
Paul got blindside tackled from behind with earphones on. That is not a fight. That is an assault. His neighbor was a chicken.
So, we have an old man in hospital with a fractured skull and a guy found at the scene with a hammer (doesn't matter whose it was) who has admitted to investigators that he was there looking for the Speaker of the House, intending to "interrogate" her. Unless you think the authorities are lying (and what could they possibly stand to gain from doing that?), these are the facts. What other facts could possibly be more significant than these? Couldn't he, for instance, have been a gay prostitute AND an unhinged Trump cultist bent on getting some time with Pelosi? If so, why would this matter? And the only way this is a "false flag" operation (which is stupid beyond all imagining) is if it didn't happen at all (and again, see old man in hospital with skull fracture). As such, its still an "operation" in which a person with demonstrable Trump/conspiracy proclivities predating the attack put an old man in the hospital by means of hammer to skull, except with the theoretical possibility that that some diabolical lib Democrat paid him to do it. But then what kind of toxic political stew would produce a person WILLING to club an old man with a hammer in pursuit his political aims, even if paid to do so? Even if this guy is nuts, he's nuts in exactly the same way that those hundreds of "patriots" running around on Jan 6 shouting "where's Nancy? " are. It's a particular kind of nuts, and it's going around.
You never said that. Why do you lie? Why do you try to turn this thread into your personal den of lies?
Rand Paul got jacked up. All the opinion polls on this issue show that over 80% of respondents consider his beatdown to be justifiable. I don't know about your country, but in America we respect property rights and abhor sissies who can't fight.
Paul got blindside tackled from behind with earphones on. That is not a fight. That is an assault. His neighbor was a chicken.
He didn't get blind sided. He was out there in his bathrobe and slippers deliberately antagonizing and vandalizing his neighbor's property. He had been warned multiple times to cut that sh!t out, and he decided to keep poking the old man in the eye. He finally got his comeuppance on his OWN front lawn. It embarrassed the hell out of him, so he went crying to the court house claiming all kinds of "pain and suffering" because an old man beat him up. But keep believing the media narrative if you need to justify your world view . . . . . .
The Pelosi home in San Francisco is surrounded by CCTV cameras and security detail. It would have been almost impossible for anyone to enter that house and not be noticed. David DePape was identified by the police at the Pelo...
So, we have an old man in hospital with a fractured skull and a guy found at the scene with a hammer (doesn't matter whose it was) who has admitted to investigators that he was there looking for the Speaker of the House, intending to "interrogate" her. Unless you think the authorities are lying (and what could they possibly stand to gain from doing that?), these are the facts. What other facts could possibly be more significant than these? Couldn't he, for instance, have been a gay prostitute AND an unhinged Trump cultist bent on getting some time with Pelosi? If so, why would this matter? And the only way this is a "false flag" operation (which is stupid beyond all imagining) is if it didn't happen at all (and again, see old man in hospital with skull fracture). As such, its still an "operation" in which a person with demonstrable Trump/conspiracy proclivities predating the attack put an old man in the hospital by means of hammer to skull, except with the theoretical possibility that that some diabolical lib Democrat paid him to do it. But then what kind of toxic political stew would produce a person WILLING to club an old man with a hammer in pursuit his political aims, even if paid to do so? Even if this guy is nuts, he's nuts in exactly the same way that those hundreds of "patriots" running around on Jan 6 shouting "where's Nancy? " are. It's a particular kind of nuts, and it's going around.
What matters is that the official story we are being told does not hold up.
And that people like you are smearing the protesters on 1/6 by comparing him to this very troubled man
FORMER neighbor. Someone who DOESN'T live there knows how someone else's home security works. How many people know their neighbors well enough to know... (she did not live next door ... she lived down the street).
"fleets of SUVs at the mansion 24/7" ... how could this idiot even drive home or park if the fleets of SUVs clogged them 24/7?
"If a glass smashed, an alarm went off!" ... how many times did she smash Pelosi's windows to confirm that?
"her computers scrambled [by Pelosi]" ... LOL.
She is clueless, and an old hag, right down your alley, Dan.
So, we have an old man in hospital with a fractured skull and a guy found at the scene with a hammer (doesn't matter whose it was) who has admitted to investigators that he was there looking for the Speaker of the House, intending to "interrogate" her. Unless you think the authorities are lying (and what could they possibly stand to gain from doing that?), these are the facts. What other facts could possibly be more significant than these? Couldn't he, for instance, have been a gay prostitute AND an unhinged Trump cultist bent on getting some time with Pelosi? If so, why would this matter? And the only way this is a "false flag" operation (which is stupid beyond all imagining) is if it didn't happen at all (and again, see old man in hospital with skull fracture). As such, its still an "operation" in which a person with demonstrable Trump/conspiracy proclivities predating the attack put an old man in the hospital by means of hammer to skull, except with the theoretical possibility that that some diabolical lib Democrat paid him to do it. But then what kind of toxic political stew would produce a person WILLING to club an old man with a hammer in pursuit his political aims, even if paid to do so? Even if this guy is nuts, he's nuts in exactly the same way that those hundreds of "patriots" running around on Jan 6 shouting "where's Nancy? " are. It's a particular kind of nuts, and it's going around.
No trial has been completed and no convictions have been made yet so it's not really fair to say what the "facts" are just yet. That's why we have a legal system. Let's the video evidence. The photograph of the glass door that was allegedly broken into doesn't corroborate the story - the glass was all over the outside of the house and the door was closed.
Remember people, we have a legal system for a reason and that reason is because the "facts" initially presented are not always truthful. That's why we present evidence in court to prove what really happened. I already gave the Smollett example, but I'll also bring up the Rittenhouse case where the news initially presented the facts as an example of an active shooter murdering protestors, until the video evidence got leaked and showed Rittenhouse was acting in self defense.
So, we have an old man in hospital with a fractured skull and a guy found at the scene with a hammer (doesn't matter whose it was) who has admitted to investigators that he was there looking for the Speaker of the House, intending to "interrogate" her. Unless you think the authorities are lying (and what could they possibly stand to gain from doing that?), these are the facts. What other facts could possibly be more significant than these? Couldn't he, for instance, have been a gay prostitute AND an unhinged Trump cultist bent on getting some time with Pelosi? If so, why would this matter? And the only way this is a "false flag" operation (which is stupid beyond all imagining) is if it didn't happen at all (and again, see old man in hospital with skull fracture). As such, its still an "operation" in which a person with demonstrable Trump/conspiracy proclivities predating the attack put an old man in the hospital by means of hammer to skull, except with the theoretical possibility that that some diabolical lib Democrat paid him to do it. But then what kind of toxic political stew would produce a person WILLING to club an old man with a hammer in pursuit his political aims, even if paid to do so? Even if this guy is nuts, he's nuts in exactly the same way that those hundreds of "patriots" running around on Jan 6 shouting "where's Nancy? " are. It's a particular kind of nuts, and it's going around.
No trial has been completed and no convictions have been made yet so it's not really fair to say what the "facts" are just yet. That's why we have a legal system. Let's the video evidence. The photograph of the glass door that was allegedly broken into doesn't corroborate the story - the glass was all over the outside of the house and the door was closed.
Remember people, we have a legal system for a reason and that reason is because the "facts" initially presented are not always truthful. That's why we present evidence in court to prove what really happened. I already gave the Smollett example, but I'll also bring up the Rittenhouse case where the news initially presented the facts as an example of an active shooter murdering protestors, until the video evidence got leaked and showed Rittenhouse was acting in self defense.
Exactly! We need that bodycam footage AND the neighborhood video surveillance showing how Depape entered the residence.
So, we have an old man in hospital with a fractured skull and a guy found at the scene with a hammer (doesn't matter whose it was) who has admitted to investigators that he was there looking for the Speaker of the House, intending to "interrogate" her. Unless you think the authorities are lying (and what could they possibly stand to gain from doing that?), these are the facts. What other facts could possibly be more significant than these? Couldn't he, for instance, have been a gay prostitute AND an unhinged Trump cultist bent on getting some time with Pelosi? If so, why would this matter? And the only way this is a "false flag" operation (which is stupid beyond all imagining) is if it didn't happen at all (and again, see old man in hospital with skull fracture). As such, its still an "operation" in which a person with demonstrable Trump/conspiracy proclivities predating the attack put an old man in the hospital by means of hammer to skull, except with the theoretical possibility that that some diabolical lib Democrat paid him to do it. But then what kind of toxic political stew would produce a person WILLING to club an old man with a hammer in pursuit his political aims, even if paid to do so? Even if this guy is nuts, he's nuts in exactly the same way that those hundreds of "patriots" running around on Jan 6 shouting "where's Nancy? " are. It's a particular kind of nuts, and it's going around.
No trial has been completed and no convictions have been made yet so it's not really fair to say what the "facts" are just yet. That's why we have a legal system. Let's the video evidence. The photograph of the glass door that was allegedly broken into doesn't corroborate the story - the glass was all over the outside of the house and the door was closed.
Remember people, we have a legal system for a reason and that reason is because the "facts" initially presented are not always truthful. That's why we present evidence in court to prove what really happened. I already gave the Smollett example, but I'll also bring up the Rittenhouse case where the news initially presented the facts as an example of an active shooter murdering protestors, until the video evidence got leaked and showed Rittenhouse was acting in self defense.
also, again, who is DePape's lawyer?
Why is this single question-- which is at the basis of our justice system and whose repercussions in this case could be immense (did he "knowingly" waive his Miranda rights?)-- so difficult to answer?
If there's not a "coverup," San Francisco police, the D.A.'s office and the Famous But Incompetent are giving people every reason to suspect there is one.
So, we have an old man in hospital with a fractured skull and a guy found at the scene with a hammer (doesn't matter whose it was) who has admitted to investigators that he was there looking for the Speaker of the House, intending to "interrogate" her. Unless you think the authorities are lying (and what could they possibly stand to gain from doing that?), these are the facts. What other facts could possibly be more significant than these? Couldn't he, for instance, have been a gay prostitute AND an unhinged Trump cultist bent on getting some time with Pelosi? If so, why would this matter? And the only way this is a "false flag" operation (which is stupid beyond all imagining) is if it didn't happen at all (and again, see old man in hospital with skull fracture). As such, its still an "operation" in which a person with demonstrable Trump/conspiracy proclivities predating the attack put an old man in the hospital by means of hammer to skull, except with the theoretical possibility that that some diabolical lib Democrat paid him to do it. But then what kind of toxic political stew would produce a person WILLING to club an old man with a hammer in pursuit his political aims, even if paid to do so? Even if this guy is nuts, he's nuts in exactly the same way that those hundreds of "patriots" running around on Jan 6 shouting "where's Nancy? " are. It's a particular kind of nuts, and it's going around.
No trial has been completed and no convictions have been made yet so it's not really fair to say what the "facts" are just yet. That's why we have a legal system. Let's the video evidence. The photograph of the glass door that was allegedly broken into doesn't corroborate the story - the glass was all over the outside of the house and the door was closed.
Remember people, we have a legal system for a reason and that reason is because the "facts" initially presented are not always truthful. That's why we present evidence in court to prove what really happened. I already gave the Smollett example, but I'll also bring up the Rittenhouse case where the news initially presented the facts as an example of an active shooter murdering protestors, until the video evidence got leaked and showed Rittenhouse was acting in self defense.
And no statements from a lawyer on behalf of DePape.
-no video of any kind
-no residential search at DePape’s residence
and the numerous other unusual points in this bizarre situation.
So, we have an old man in hospital with a fractured skull and a guy found at the scene with a hammer (doesn't matter whose it was) who has admitted to investigators that he was there looking for the Speaker of the House, intending to "interrogate" her. Unless you think the authorities are lying (and what could they possibly stand to gain from doing that?), these are the facts. What other facts could possibly be more significant than these? Couldn't he, for instance, have been a gay prostitute AND an unhinged Trump cultist bent on getting some time with Pelosi? If so, why would this matter? And the only way this is a "false flag" operation (which is stupid beyond all imagining) is if it didn't happen at all (and again, see old man in hospital with skull fracture). As such, its still an "operation" in which a person with demonstrable Trump/conspiracy proclivities predating the attack put an old man in the hospital by means of hammer to skull, except with the theoretical possibility that that some diabolical lib Democrat paid him to do it. But then what kind of toxic political stew would produce a person WILLING to club an old man with a hammer in pursuit his political aims, even if paid to do so? Even if this guy is nuts, he's nuts in exactly the same way that those hundreds of "patriots" running around on Jan 6 shouting "where's Nancy? " are. It's a particular kind of nuts, and it's going around.
No trial has been completed and no convictions have been made yet so it's not really fair to say what the "facts" are just yet. That's why we have a legal system. Let's the video evidence. The photograph of the glass door that was allegedly broken into doesn't corroborate the story - the glass was all over the outside of the house and the door was closed.
Remember people, we have a legal system for a reason and that reason is because the "facts" initially presented are not always truthful. That's why we present evidence in court to prove what really happened. I already gave the Smollett example, but I'll also bring up the Rittenhouse case where the news initially presented the facts as an example of an active shooter murdering protestors, until the video evidence got leaked and showed Rittenhouse was acting in self defense.
