Gidey just ran the single greatest female running performance ever... Give her the black page! Letesenbet MF Gidey 1:02:52

liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

We have a winner for the dumbest poster who has ever come to Letsrun.

So says the man who refuses to read about the racist phrase he uses and then apologise fir the offence caused to various communities.

You should be banned for using offensive racial phrases.

Care to identify the racial phrases? Oh, right - you are lying again. If I had so used such phrases I would have been banned. But here I still am, in a dialogue with a complete moron.

Armstronglivs wrote:

liar soorer wrote:

So says the man who refuses to read about the racist phrase he uses and then apologise fir the offence caused to various communities.

You should be banned for using offensive racial phrases.

Care to identify the racial phrases? Oh, right - you are lying again. If I had so used such phrases I would have been banned. But here I still am, in a dialogue with a complete moron.

You know the exact one; you have tried to debate it on other threads.

So a bigot will try and lie away their racial bigotry.

liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Care to identify the racial phrases? Oh, right - you are lying again. If I had so used such phrases I would have been banned. But here I still am, in a dialogue with a complete moron.

You know the exact one; you have tried to debate it on other threads.

So a bigot will try and lie away their racial bigotry.

You used the phrase again on an other thread so why did you pretend confusion.

So.. are you a racist denier or racist apologist?

liar soorer wrote:

liar soorer wrote:

You know the exact one; you have tried to debate it on other threads.

So a bigot will try and lie away their racial bigotry.

You used the phrase again on an other thread so why did you pretend confusion.

So.. are you a racist denier or racist apologist?

You should ask the mods. Because I am still here. But there is no doubt you are a doping denier and a doping apologist. But it hasn't helped Shelby. She remains banned.

Armstronglivs wrote:

liar soorer wrote:

You used the phrase again on an other thread so why did you pretend confusion.

So.. are you a racist denier or racist apologist?

You should ask the mods. Because I am still here. But there is no doubt you are a doping denier and a doping apologist. But it hasn't helped Shelby. She remains banned.

Wrong again, I said SH should be banned.

How is it in racist deniers corner.

liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

You should ask the mods. Because I am still here. But there is no doubt you are a doping denier and a doping apologist. But it hasn't helped Shelby. She remains banned.

Wrong again, I said SH should be banned.

How is it in racist deniers corner.

I see you justify racist stuff on the Latino Salibad thread on the basis of free speech.

liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

You should ask the mods. Because I am still here. But there is no doubt you are a doping denier and a doping apologist. But it hasn't helped Shelby. She remains banned.

Wrong again, I said SH should be banned.

How is it in racist deniers corner.

I don't know. How is it?

Armstronglivs wrote:

liar soorer wrote:

Wrong again, I said SH should be banned.

How is it in racist deniers corner.

I don't know. How is it?

So will you apologise for using phrases that are perceived as racist ?

liar soorer wrote:

Appreciation?? wrote:

After witnessing Jacob Kiplimo's half marathon WR last month, I'm reminded that this women's WR by Gidey makes perfect sense anyway if we assume men have the bottom end of the percentage advantage everyone cites (which is 8-10%)

62:52 - 8% = 57:50

Even if we assume 9%,

-9% = 57:24

Which 8%/9% is that; is that just a crude rule of thumb or one that has a more scientific basis.

I don't know how much physiological data is available on this topic, but from a statistical standpoint, men tend to be about 10% ahead in world records (check out this article:

).