OK, I see you are still using your comparison of all other countries togather against Kenya. You just have not understood the unbelievable stubidity which is behind this "argumentation".
No, not all the champions in all the events came from other countries.
"Close to the top" in any event. Even this was not understood by you. Hard to believe - also I know your extremely limited thinking.
No. 1 in the 3000m, in the 5000m, in the 10000m, in the steeple - and 0.07s over the world record in the 800m, and 1s in the 1500m and the Mile. Yes, this for sure is a very strong argument for Kenya no. 1 in this period. Also your extremely limited brain can't grasp such very easy connections.
Those numbers are not the ultimate argument, for sure. When we add the extreme domination at the Commonwealth Games in all the events (I'm not talking about the Marathon, so if you add this you again change the subject) and the most number of Olympic medals (despite the 76 boykott) it's hard to argue against Kenya.
54 African records by Kenyans in this period, 21 by all the other African countries combined (I think I was wrong with this one before). For you this means Kenya was just one of several African countries. Looking forward that you will claim this again!
Which country has done better over the full spectrum of events 800m to 10000m incl. steeple in the period 1964 to 1979?
New Zealand? Australia? Great Britain? Finland? USA? Upper Volta? Fiji?
Name this country and give me your arguments why you think this country has done better in this period.
I know you will not do it.
Instead you will ask me something I have asked you several times. Madness pure. THIS will do. Definitely!