Finally...Unequivocal Proof That the Apollo Moon Landings Were Staged on Earth

gottagofast wrote:

valjean wrote:

So dune buggies require far more advanced tech than observing merging black holes via gravitational waves? That doesn't make sense to me. Why is sending a human to the moon so much harder than building an impossibly precise and fantastical detection instrument? Before you say "van allen radiation" remember that the satellites that discovered the van allen belts were in fact discovered and mapped by the group that later became NASA - so if you think NASA is conspiring against us, then why do you trust their reports about the existence of the van allen belts themselves?

In the 60s before we had circuitboards at scale and with nascent computing? Yes.

If sending a human is so easy, go ahead and send one now after 60 years of technological improvements.

Kolsiv wrote:

The hoops you guys have to jump through trying to prove it. Lol

Just because one thing happens doesn’t mean something else happened.

valjean wrote:

gottagofast wrote:

In the 60s before we had circuitboards at scale and with nascent computing? Yes.

If sending a human is so easy, go ahead and send one now after 60 years of technological improvements.

Why is it necessary to have circuitboards made at scale? Were circuitboards the only thing keeping us from going to the moon? I thought that the problem was radiation shielding. What was the problem then?

Luckily for you, there are multiple manned lunar missions planned for the next few years

gottagofast wrote:

valjean wrote:

Why is it necessary to have circuitboards made at scale? Were circuitboards the only thing keeping us from going to the moon? I thought that the problem was radiation shielding. What was the problem then?

Luckily for you, there are multiple manned lunar missions planned for the next few years

There have been planned missions every decade since the "landings." There are always reasons why they never pan out, but they still keep dangling that carrot out there.

Don't worry, I hear we're going to go "around the moon" very soon.

valjean wrote:

Kolsiv wrote:

The hoops you guys have to jump through trying to prove it. Lol

Just because one thing happens doesn’t mean something else happened.

I agree. Can you point out the place where I made a mistaken casual link between that something and that something else?

Kolsiv wrote:

A few posts back.

Golf and dune buggies. 😂

valjean wrote:

gottagofast wrote:

There have been planned missions every decade since the "landings." There are always reasons why they never pan out, but they still keep dangling that carrot out there.

Don't worry, I hear we're going to go "around the moon" very soon.

I guess we'll see. So were circuitboards or radiation shielding the problem or what? And why do you trust NASA to tell you about space at all if you don't trust what they say about the moon landing? For all you know, space might not exist. There might just be a big dome up thereU

Armstronglivs wrote:

It's so obvious wrote:

There is absolutely no way the moon landings could have been staged on Earth. Come on. This is obvious. Way too many people would be in the know, far too many witnesses, and everything would have leaked by now. No way.

Instead, the moon landings were faked on the moon. No witnesses nearby. The perfect place to pull off a hoax of this magnitude in absolute secrecy.

Totally obvious once you think about it.

valjean wrote:

Kolsiv wrote:

A few posts back.

Golf and dune buggies. 😂

can you be more specific

Johnny Vohden wrote:

So we can assume the Apollo 1 tragedy and Apollo 13 were also staged to give validity to the Apollo fake landings? That's giving it your all...dying for a hoax.

Kolsiv wrote:

If we actually landed on the moon 50+ years ago, you know we would be mining the sh^t out of that place today.

gottagofast wrote:

You seem to be under the impression that NASA invented space or astronomy. They didn't.

And just because they faked one thing doesn't mean they faked all things.

I think this is probably where they drew most of their inspiration. Humanity has been interested in faking moon landings for some time:

Video:www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLVChRVfZ74

Check out the highly scientific splashdown at 11:11. How are you going to argue with that? It's on grainy, black and white footage.

Timothy Foyle wrote:

Kolsiv wrote:

If we actually landed on the moon 50+ years ago, you know we would be mining the sh^t out of that place today.

Yeah, for sure. Because we all know that would be a really cheap way to get some minerals.

it is interesting ... wrote:

Fakers wrote:

20 astronauts! Mission Control! All their families! It’s more work to fake!

Why hasn’t ANYONE taken a photo of the empty landing sites? It would be so easy! Russia or China could do it tonight!

Twenty so-called space travellers would be on need to know. Their families? You must be joking. Do people at N.S.A., C.I.A., Office of Naval Intelligence tell their wives about their day at work? No! Mission Control? Stove pipe. Need to know only.