Deanouk wrote:
Haven't they proved that the long term effects of some drugs stay in your system for years?
Not sure which ones off the top of my head, but one of the arguments levelled at Gatlin is that he is able to still run at the same level he did when doping because of the long term effects of the drugs he was using a lot of earlier in his career!
I am no fan of drugs, but who are "they" and how would you say they should go about "proving" it? Think about how one would "prove" that the effects of doping are still around years later in a human.