rojo wrote:
Your kidding right?
I'll admit I'm talking off of pure emotion here. I just got back from dinner and know no actual facts but when I read that, my first reaction was, "I hope there is some way she can file a lawsuit."
How in God's name can they leave off a women that got royally screwed? If anything, they should just run the same team that ran today. They almost got the OR.
People talk about her whining? Well wouldn't you whine? You were told you were an Olympian. Then got screwed as they didn't do the drawing of straws (which was in the rule book as the USA final was nothing more than the 1st round of the Olympics) despite what anyone says.
The public sentiment should be 100% behind her. Period.
This is very wrong.
Yeah, it sucks that she was told she was third when they actually tied. Everyone should feel bad about that. But she wasn't screwed out of the Olympics -- and I cannot believe you are seriously arguing that she was screwed because she didn't get a chance to draw straws. If that had happened, I guarantee you would argue that the USATF should have changed their procedure to something else and she got screwed by the decision to follow procedure.
I thought "I hope there's no way that someone who wasn't even willing to do a run-off can file a lawsuit" (and that's ignoring how stupid a lawsuit is in this situation).
But biggest thing is: they don't make a relay to reward the fourth place finisher at trials, regardless of how close the race was. The point is to create the best relay team possible. What has she done to make anyone think that the relay team is better off with her?