Imagine if biden was hit by a bullet and the "M-AGA CULT" was arguing whether it was a bullet or fragment of glass.
the libs would be ROASTING the "M-AGA CULT" over trying to argue this minute and pointless difference.
Actually, no. Reverse the situation and I’d be saying the same things. The situation is a tragedy, we can’t know yet what hit him, and let the investigation play out.
I would have no reason to say something is true then to defend my position when I know I have no idea, and it doesn’t matter much either way.
As usual the LRC change of title only makes thing more confused. "FBI Director: Trump wonders if trump was hit by a bullet or shrapnel." Trump is not "wondering". The FBI hasn't found any of the bullets, but did find shrapnel. That's why Christopher Wray is wondering. Except for political spin by both sides in this stupidest-in-American-history presidential campaign, it makes no practical difference. Trump was slightly wounded by something caused by the sniper's shooting. We know the bullets whizzed past his head and could have killed him. They did kill a spectator and seriously wound two others. We'll never know for sure if it was bullets or shrapnel that caused the wound to Trump's ear. Meh.
Fox News is pulling their hair out today trying to prove Trump got hit by a bullet and not glass. This REALLY matters to the MAG@s. It HAS to be a bullet.
Actually, no. Reverse the situation and I’d be saying the same things. The situation is a tragedy, we can’t know yet what hit him, and let the investigation play out.
I would have no reason to say something is true then to defend my position when I know I have no idea, and it doesn’t matter much either way.
As you said it doesn’t really matter. It was an assassination attempt and he was hit by something from it.
Fox News is pulling their hair out today trying to prove Trump got hit by a bullet and not glass. This REALLY matters to the MAG@s. It HAS to be a bullet.
Fox News is pulling their hair out today trying to prove Trump got hit by a bullet and not glass. This REALLY matters to the MAG@s. It HAS to be a bullet.
Even the NYT debunked the shrapnel theory today.
No they didn't, Bunkle. Trump got hit by teleprompter glass that somehow splashed backwards onto his ear. You can see it in slo-mo video.
Imagine if biden was hit by a bullet and the "M-AGA CULT" was arguing whether it was a bullet or fragment of glass.
the libs would be ROASTING the "M-AGA CULT" over trying to argue this minute and pointless difference.
Actually, no. Reverse the situation and I’d be saying the same things. The situation is a tragedy, we can’t know yet what hit him, and let the investigation play out.
I would have no reason to say something is true then to defend my position when I know I have no idea, and it doesn’t matter much either way.
CORRECTION:
we know exactly what him him, an assassins sniper bullet. thankfully he ducked after hearing the shot, then had the smarts under enormous stress that NONE of you have experienced, to get down (on his own) before the Secret Service faked their concern.
Whatever your jealousy is, or Wrays, really isn’t of concern in the real World.
No they didn't, Bunkle. Trump got hit by teleprompter glass that somehow splashed backwards onto his ear. You can see it in slo-mo video.
Did you even read the article? Or do you just know these things from your extensive video game experience?
What article? You didn't link an article. If you want someone to read something, you have to identify it for them. That's like basic stuff, man. Basic like glass flying backward and hitting someone in the ear type basic.
I heard the Trump campaign is offering $10,000 for anyone who finds the magic bullet in Boofoo, PA. Now you have all these MAG@s with metal detectors walking up and down a 500 X 700 grass field. One idiot even took his detector in the drainage pond to the southwest of the pulpit. He's sloshing around in there with a short circuited device.
This is the same FBI Director who had the Hunter Biden laptop for years and did not act on the crimes documented in it including human trafficking. Who claimed Antifa was an idea. Who oversaw the agency that created the Gretchen Witmer kidnapping hoax. That called parents protesting at school board meeting domestic terrorists. The list goes on so call me skeptical of anything this guy, who is the dictionary example of swamp creature, says.
So the idea is that Trump's ear was hit by shrapnel, who knows where the shrapnel came from, because the bullets ended up hitting targets well away from Trump. So the shrapnel ended fly a long way to strike Trumps ear, and no where else, which appeared to be in the path of the bullet by all images and ballistics.
It is not hard for the FBI to run ballistics to know the path of this bullet. Plus all the camera's taking pictures and video of the event, not one managed to capture anything which could be shrapnel. It is so absurdly unlikely it was shrapnel that its very obvious what is going on here. Wray is a member of the Deep State is trying to feed the conspiracy that the left has going on that Trump staged the assassination to raise his standing. A third of Democrats believe the ridiculous idea that Trump staged this. Wray and others in the intelligence community despise Trump and do not want him back, and are going to pull out all the stops to try and keep him from the White House.
Since Trump has made a career out of dodging bullets the interest in his latest escape has faded from public interest already. Near misses for Trump don't evoke much public sympathy - it happens with him all the time.
As usual the LRC change of title only makes thing more confused. "FBI Director: Trump wonders if trump was hit by a bullet or shrapnel." Trump is not "wondering". The FBI hasn't found any of the bullets, but did find shrapnel. That's why Christopher Wray is wondering. Except for political spin by both sides in this stupidest-in-American-history presidential campaign, it makes no practical difference. Trump was slightly wounded by something caused by the sniper's shooting. We know the bullets whizzed past his head and could have killed him. They did kill a spectator and seriously wound two others. We'll never know for sure if it was bullets or shrapnel that caused the wound to Trump's ear. Meh.
Agree. Trump was the target of an assassination attempt and was injured. Many in the Trump camp are putting unwarranted importance on whether it was a bullet. Many on the left are doing the same. To someone thinking logically, it just doesn't matter (other than humor in both sides working so hard on a meaningless point.
Personally, I would be happy if it is proven to be shrapnel simply because it would piss off Trump, Ronny Jackson and the cult. But it still is a serious matter and a horrible screw up by the security team.
I heard the Trump campaign is offering $10,000 for anyone who finds the magic bullet in Boofoo, PA.
That is because the bullet that hit donOLD can't be found because it doesn't exist. Trump needs a bullet for the same gun model (15+ years old) to show off. He will not give it to the FBI for forensic testing because that would blow his cover.
As usual the LRC change of title only makes thing more confused. "FBI Director: Trump wonders if trump was hit by a bullet or shrapnel." Trump is not "wondering". The FBI hasn't found any of the bullets, but did find shrapnel. That's why Christopher Wray is wondering. Except for political spin by both sides in this stupidest-in-American-history presidential campaign, it makes no practical difference. Trump was slightly wounded by something caused by the sniper's shooting. We know the bullets whizzed past his head and could have killed him. They did kill a spectator and seriously wound two others. We'll never know for sure if it was bullets or shrapnel that caused the wound to Trump's ear. Meh.
Agree. Trump was the target of an assassination attempt and was injured. Many in the Trump camp are putting unwarranted importance on whether it was a bullet. Many on the left are doing the same. To someone thinking logically, it just doesn't matter (other than humor in both sides working so hard on a meaningless point.
Personally, I would be happy if it is proven to be shrapnel simply because it would piss off Trump, Ronny Jackson and the cult. But it still is a serious matter and a horrible screw up by the security team.
Gaslight 👆. we all understand it was a bullet, it’s only the importance from your side who desires to make up other stories.
As usual the LRC change of title only makes thing more confused. "FBI Director: Trump wonders if trump was hit by a bullet or shrapnel." Trump is not "wondering". The FBI hasn't found any of the bullets, but did find shrapnel. That's why Christopher Wray is wondering. Except for political spin by both sides in this stupidest-in-American-history presidential campaign, it makes no practical difference. Trump was slightly wounded by something caused by the sniper's shooting. We know the bullets whizzed past his head and could have killed him. They did kill a spectator and seriously wound two others. We'll never know for sure if it was bullets or shrapnel that caused the wound to Trump's ear. Meh.
Agree. Trump was the target of an assassination attempt and was injured. Many in the Trump camp are putting unwarranted importance on whether it was a bullet. Many on the left are doing the same. To someone thinking logically, it just doesn't matter (other than humor in both sides working so hard on a meaningless point.
Personally, I would be happy if it is proven to be shrapnel simply because it would piss off Trump, Ronny Jackson and the cult. But it still is a serious matter and a horrible screw up by the security team.
The head of Trump's personal security team told the SS people in charge to NOT bother the guy on the roof. That is why the snipers on a higher roof behind Trump did not shot the guy even though he had a gun aimed at Trump. Trump's team was in control of this staged event.
Do people actually believe that this was staged? They got an actor, who understood he would be killed to be a staged shooter?
I love me some conspiracy theories
While I do not believe this is a conspiracy, the actor would not have been told. Oswald was certainly not told what he was going to happen that day. He certainly wasn't told Ruby was going to gun him down in a parking lot while surrounded by police and cameras. That's the whole point of being a patsy.
So someone got this kid to agree to take shots at Trump and assured the shooter he'd be protected or the kid convinced he'd be able to shoot at Trump and survive knowing that a dozen snipers and other agents were everywhere?
I don't see anyone can honestly think this kid was an actor, no bullets were fired, nothing hit Trump, and that this was a staged event. Or someone got this kid to legitimately try and kill Trump. Why can't it be just a rogue individual who took shots at Trump on his own accord?
We've updated our BetterRunningShoes.com web site to make it easier to find good deals on the best shoes. To keep it great we need new shoe reviews from you.