Hardly. Not even the goat American marathoner or 10,000 runner. He was at his peak very briefly, and may well have been cheating then, Judging from the comments of former AW teammates. And as a coach ... there is a reason he has been anathematized. I don't think many of Salazar's defenders believe he was innocent. They just resent the fact that his hubris finally caught up with him.
Most people actually have evidence....phone records. Nowadays, it is VERY easy to have evidence, as we live in a digital age. Please approach your arguments with objective rationale, not emotion. You lose credibility when you use emotion and subjective takes.
Thankfully due to technology we are able to solve quite a bit of crimes in the 21st century, this includes wearable devices that people inadvertently wear when they commit crimes.
Educate yourself, and keep these comments anonymous so you don't embarrass yourself in person.
Utter nonsense. Read the rules of the bipartisan Congress-generated institution SafeSport, and remember that that cheater and abuser also lost in arbitration.
The day before longtime head coach Greg Metcalf stepped down, a group of upperclassmen distance runners went to the athletic department with a list of grievances from athletes detailing physical
Utter nonsense. Read the rules of the bipartisan Congress-generated institution SafeSport, and remember that that cheater and abuser also lost in arbitration.
That's not due process.
So, you haven't read the rules. Read at least:
J. Procedural Rights of Respondents Federal law provides Respondents with certain procedural rights. 36 USC § 220541(a)(1)(H). For any action taken against a Respondent, including an investigation, the imposition of sanctions, or any other disciplinary action, the Center must provide procedural due process to the Respondent, which includes:
....
and then explain why that is not due process.
You can't? That's what I thought. Stop spreading your false PR here, just stop.
Why are there so many internet randos defending alberto when he himself hasn't denied anything?
AlSal did categorically deny the sexual assault allegations, stating: “I have never sexually assaulted Ms. Goucher and never would have done so. The accusation is deeply hurtful and abhorrent and contrary to my fundamental beliefs as a husband, father and deeply devout Catholic."
Nevertheless, multiple forums found against him. Further, I think it's also very telling that AlSal never sued Goucher or Simon and Schuster for defamation. It seems apparent that the guy is/was (hopefully he got some help) a nasty drunk.
Most people actually have evidence....phone records. Nowadays, it is VERY easy to have evidence, as we live in a digital age. Please approach your arguments with objective rationale, not emotion. You lose credibility when you use emotion and subjective takes.
Thankfully due to technology we are able to solve quite a bit of crimes in the 21st century, this includes wearable devices that people inadvertently wear when they commit crimes.
Educate yourself, and keep these comments anonymous so you don't embarrass yourself in person.
Right. A lot of overconfident old thugs end up screwed from cameras in everyone’s pocket.
You obviously don't know the definition of hearsay. The majority of evidence is testimonial evidence from witnesses, involved parties, and witnesses. That does not make such evidence hearsay.
-signed, a lawyer
They say that whenever a woman says they were assaulted. Its just what happens with all these 30 yo men in basements.
As an athlete Alberto was the most single minded runner there was. He would anything , work as hard as possible, anything to inprove. He went to Kenya, by himself, to train for a few months.. He used to wear a contraption that looked like a scuba outfit to run in to simulate altitude. Within ten days he ran two epic battles a 10,000 against Rono and then a marathon against Beardsley. He trained so hard it disrupted his endocrine system. How, with his background, would expect him to be as a coach??
Most people actually have evidence....phone records. Nowadays, it is VERY easy to have evidence, as we live in a digital age. Please approach your arguments with objective rationale, not emotion. You lose credibility when you use emotion and subjective takes.
Thankfully due to technology we are able to solve quite a bit of crimes in the 21st century, this includes wearable devices that people inadvertently wear when they commit crimes.
Educate yourself, and keep these comments anonymous so you don't embarrass yourself in person.
What phone record is created when someone sticks their finger in your butt during a massage? I must not have that app.
It's interesting that he didn't have anything really proven against him but allegations which lacked any clarity, yet coaches/agents out there who are complicit with doping and taking large sums of money from athletes continue to prey on African athletes unabated. Jama Aden continues to coach yet caught with EPO and the corresponding paraphernalia. Then you wonder why there's a doping problem approaching tour de Framce peak levels.
Fun fact: Jama Aden was only caught with non-doping substances. He was cleared of criminal charges in Spain, apparently for lack of a case against him, and so far was never charged with any anti-doping rule violation, also apparently due to a lack of any evidence. There is still time within the statute of limitations, I suppose.
But despite never being suspended, and always being eligible to coach, he has surely paid a dear price in the court of public opinion, which does not always require facts and evidence, and had to go underground and change his name.
False: "Multiple press reports say the authorities found pre-filled syringes of EPO, anabolic steroids and other doping materials."
We give you the scoop on the biggest doping scandal in distance running’s history and the biggest non-country related (i.e. Russia) doping scandal since BALCO. In the near future, we'll have much more for you including, 'What...
Not quite. The authorities found these in the rooms of Balla and Mounir. That's how it was reported 7 years ago. Balla was banned. Not sure about Mounir.
In Aden's room, they only found non-doping vitamins. This is entirely consistent with what whistleblower David Torrence told us.
Why are there so many internet randos defending alberto when he himself hasn't denied anything?
AlSal did categorically deny the sexual assault allegations, stating: “I have never sexually assaulted Ms. Goucher and never would have done so. The accusation is deeply hurtful and abhorrent and contrary to my fundamental beliefs as a husband, father and deeply devout Catholic."
Nevertheless, multiple forums found against him. Further, I think it's also very telling that AlSal never sued Goucher or Simon and Schuster for defamation. It seems apparent that the guy is/was (hopefully he got some help) a nasty drunk.
I don't think goucher was the only one that got the finger-in-the-Rumpp happy ending
You obviously don't know the definition of hearsay. The majority of evidence is testimonial evidence from witnesses, involved parties, and witnesses. That does not make such evidence hearsay.
-signed, a lawyer
They say that whenever a woman says they were assaulted. Its just what happens with all these 30 yo men in basements.
J. Procedural Rights of Respondents Federal law provides Respondents with certain procedural rights. 36 USC § 220541(a)(1)(H). For any action taken against a Respondent, including an investigation, the imposition of sanctions, or any other disciplinary action, the Center must provide procedural due process to the Respondent, which includes:
....
and then explain why that is not due process.
You can't? That's what I thought. Stop spreading your false PR here, just stop.
"Procedural due process" (i.e, due process as defined by SafeSport) apparently isn't the same as legal due process.
From Salazar's Wiki page:
"At the arbitration hearing Salazar denied the accusations against him, and said he did not speak with or see the runner on the days in question.[5] The appeal was unsuccessful as an arbitrator did not find Salazar’s explanation credible, and accepted his accuser’s version of events, determining that he more likely than not had sexually assaulted the athlete on two different occasions and had also made sexually inappropriate comments toward the runner."
So his ban was decided by a single arbitrator, based on an accusation by a single accuser.
Do you see the difference between that and a jury trial, where evidence is presented, multiple witnesses can be questioned, and 12 people decide guilt or innocence?
Fine. An accusation is not hearsay then. But it's still just an accusation. And as we all know, people -- even women -- can and do falsely accuse others.
