Except Trump wasn't outed... he was never on the island and only flew on the plane a few times in the 90s... and banned Epstein from Mar a Lago after it was known he was pig.
Meanwhile, Bill Clinton was all over the island and Hillary no doubt knew all about it.
Joe was busy molesting kids who all somehow grew up to be sex addicts with drug problems.
What do get out of excusing and ignoring every one of Trump's indiscretions?
The lengths you'll go to to provide cover for the guy is ridiculous. There's absolutely no reason for any person to continue to support the guy.
It's truly weird.
He and the other cultist have to try and distract/deflect from the reality of a successful sleepy joe admin
It's not the first time Rep. Troy Nehls has seemed to say the quiet part of loud: In December he suggested impeachment was about giving "ammo" to Trump.
I get the deflection nonsense. However, at this point the Trump support is down right strange. Couldn't they throw their support behind a different candidate?
I get the deflection nonsense. However, at this point the Trump support is down right strange. Couldn't they throw their support behind a different candidate?
I get the deflection nonsense. However, at this point the Trump support is down right strange. Couldn't they throw their support behind a different candidate?
Except Trump wasn't outed... he was never on the island and only flew on the plane a few times in the 90s... and banned Epstein from Mar a Lago after it was known he was pig.
Meanwhile, Bill Clinton was all over the island and Hillary no doubt knew all about it.
Joe was busy molesting kids who all somehow grew up to be sex addicts with drug problems.
What do get out of excusing and ignoring every one of Trump's indiscretions?
The lengths you'll go to to provide cover for the guy is ridiculous. There's absolutely no reason for any person to continue to support the guy.
It's truly weird.
When all of the accusations turn out to be verifiable bullsh*t it's not "covering for him" to disbelieve new allegations.
You hate him because you believe all of the accusations and never bothered to see if they were true or not.
ok good let's agree not to vote for DeNiro for president. Or DiCaprio. Or Trump. Anyone on the list is out of contention for president.
We cool?
Except Trump wasn't outed... he was never on the island and only flew on the plane a few times in the 90s... and banned Epstein from Mar a Lago after it was known he was pig.
Meanwhile, Bill Clinton was all over the island and Hillary no doubt knew all about it.
Joe was busy molesting kids who all somehow grew up to be sex addicts with drug problems.
According to that second dump, Trump was on the Epsteins leer jet over 40 times, including as late as 2005. Trump had his own jet by then, so why use Epsteins jet all the time unless he wanted some face-to-face confidential time with Epsteins? And there are photos of Epsteins in Palm Beach after the alleged Mar-A-Lago "ban."
It's not the first time Rep. Troy Nehls has seemed to say the quiet part of loud: In December he suggested impeachment was about giving "ammo" to Trump.
When all of the accusations turn out to be verifiable bullsh*t it's not "covering for him" to disbelieve new allegations.
You hate him because you believe all of the accusations and never bothered to see if they were true or not.
trump's business has been found to be a fraudulent organization
trump's CFO is/was in jail
trump was found liable for sexual assault
a majority of the Senate voted to give him the boot.
but sure I'm confident the dozens of indictments are nothing.
Earning money legitimately and allegedly committing tax crimes on legitimate income is in no way as bad as earning illegitimate income like the Biden crime family does.
No rational human being believes E Jean Carroll's story that's why it was a civil trial in a deep blue district and not a criminal trial. As late as 2012 the woman was admiring Trump on social media. Would you praise your "rapist" online?
Except Trump wasn't outed... he was never on the island and only flew on the plane a few times in the 90s... and banned Epstein from Mar a Lago after it was known he was pig.
Meanwhile, Bill Clinton was all over the island and Hillary no doubt knew all about it.
Joe was busy molesting kids who all somehow grew up to be sex addicts with drug problems.
According to that second dump, Trump was on the Epsteins leer jet over 40 times, including as late as 2005. Trump had his own jet by then, so why use Epsteins jet all the time unless he wanted some face-to-face confidential time with Epsteins? And there are photos of Epsteins in Palm Beach after the alleged Mar-A-Lago "ban."
Let's see it.
The first dump included an interview with Epstein's wife where she said she was never a member of the club and thinks she had only ever been to the club once in 2000.
It also said Trump was only on the jet 7 times, two of which included his children, and never to the island.
According to that second dump, Trump was on the Epsteins leer jet over 40 times, including as late as 2005. Trump had his own jet by then, so why use Epsteins jet all the time unless he wanted some face-to-face confidential time with Epsteins? And there are photos of Epsteins in Palm Beach after the alleged Mar-A-Lago "ban."
Let's see it.
The first dump included an interview with Epstein's wife where she said she was never a member of the club and thinks she had only ever been to the club once in 2000.
It also said Trump was only on the jet 7 times, two of which included his children, and never to the island.
The first dump included an interview with Epstein's wife where she said she was never a member of the club and thinks she had only ever been to the club once in 2000.
It also said Trump was only on the jet 7 times, two of which included his children, and never to the island.
Prior to his stint as commander-in-chief, Mr Trump was known to have met the disgraced financier on multiple occasions, having been pictured with him at events
"Mr Trump is named in the documents four times. However, there is no indication that he has committed any wrongdoing and he has not been charged with involvement in Epstein’s crimes."
The mental disorder on display is your own. You're ignoring the facts so you can keep believing what you want to believe.
"Mr Trump is named in the documents four times. However, there is no indication that he has committed any wrongdoing and he has not been charged with involvement in Epstein’s crimes."
The mental disorder on display is your own. You're ignoring the facts so you can keep believing what you want to believe.
Dump 1 exonerated Trump.
If you claim dump 2 says something else let's see it.
I ask for evidence and you only care about feelings and opinion pieces by other people who share your feelings.
whoever's name is in the docs will just say it's he said she said.
The real evidence is not in the Epstein docs but the Epstein safe, which the FBI has and denies having. That it denies having it shows you the names in that safe are powerful enough to make the FBI deny having it.
Earning money legitimately and allegedly committing tax crimes on legitimate income is in no way as bad as earning illegitimate income like the Biden crime family does.
No rational human being believes E Jean Carroll's story that's why it was a civil trial in a deep blue district and not a criminal trial. As late as 2012 the woman was admiring Trump on social media. Would you praise your "rapist" online?
Are you talking about illegitimate income like this one?
Earning money legitimately and allegedly committing tax crimes on legitimate income is in no way as bad as earning illegitimate income like the Biden crime family does.
No rational human being believes E Jean Carroll's story that's why it was a civil trial in a deep blue district and not a criminal trial. As late as 2012 the woman was admiring Trump on social media. Would you praise your "rapist" online?
Are you talking about illegitimate income like this one?
Linking the same stories from different sources that all point to the same House Democrat report that counts all income received by Trump businesses as "illegitimate" is not an argument it's a demonstration of the echo chamber you live in.
whoever's name is in the docs will just say it's he said she said.
The real evidence is not in the Epstein docs but the Epstein safe, which the FBI has and denies having. That it denies having it shows you the names in that safe are powerful enough to make the FBI deny having it.
Okay, Mr. "Legal Eagle," except "he said she said" is not a defense in court. You think DiCaprio and Trump can just get on the stand and say "he said she said"? Trump will be pleading the Fifth again, ffs. There's no cognizable defense at least to being outed in the Epstein dump. Maybe some other aspects of the case, but not to being named out. That's a done deal once the dump is admitted into evidence.