Milo Skapinsky's times are interesting. The 3200 result is way out of line with the others, which is rather strange. One would expect the 3200 to line up with either the 1600 or 5000, instead the 3200 is an outlier compared to the others. Looks like he must have concentrated on running the 3200?
What I was most surprised to see was how far kids went from home for schools. Wisconsin is a great example, no in-state kids go UW, but tons of Wisconsin HS kids go to their competition. I could see draw of some academics at other schools, but some of it was going to some other state school. When they probably don't get a full scholarship, why go so far to go to another state school of equal caliber running?
What I was most surprised to see was how far kids went from home for schools. Wisconsin is a great example, no in-state kids go UW, but tons of Wisconsin HS kids go to their competition. I could see draw of some academics at other schools, but some of it was going to some other state school. When they probably don't get a full scholarship, why go so far to go to another state school of equal caliber running?
People should remember this thread next time someone posts a thread asking where they can run with a 4:30/9:45 profile. The answer is not at these schools. Seems like the median times among these guys is about 1:57/4:15/9:15/15:15.
People should remember this thread next time someone posts a thread asking where they can run with a 4:30/9:45 profile. The answer is not at these schools. Seems like the median times among these guys is about 1:57/4:15/9:15/15:15.
Agreed.
Those threads are so tiresome.
I should write, "Your local Community College or mid-level or weak Division III University" and then keep it around to cut and paste in every time.
Could that profile fit a lot of Division II schools? Yes. But if someone can't do half their own research, they deserve no better than a half-effort reply.
What I was most surprised to see was how far kids went from home for schools. Wisconsin is a great example, no in-state kids go UW, but tons of Wisconsin HS kids go to their competition. I could see draw of some academics at other schools, but some of it was going to some other state school. When they probably don't get a full scholarship, why go so far to go to another state school of equal caliber running?
Oh, I wondered the same thing decades ago! Specifically for non-athletes though. E.g., I grew up in Illinois, back when tuition at U of I was cheap (like, $7,000/year for tuition and room & board), and it was pretty easy to get accepted there (for example, U of I was my "safe school"), yet so many of my classmates would go out of state to other state schools and pay out-of-state tuition. Why???
It make more sense for athletes though, e.g., if they rc/d a half scholarship to an out-of-state school.
People should remember this thread next time someone posts a thread asking where they can run with a 4:30/9:45 profile. The answer is not at these schools. Seems like the median times among these guys is about 1:57/4:15/9:15/15:15.
Agreed.
Those threads are so tiresome.
I should write, "Your local Community College or mid-level or weak Division III University" and then keep it around to cut and paste in every time.
Could that profile fit a lot of Division II schools? Yes. But if someone can't do half their own research, they deserve no better than a half-effort reply.
It's a bit harder with small school (or state, I suppose) athletes who drop big times for their division and dominate. I have a kid (Jr) who has gone 51/1:56/4:18 and 15:32 for XC. He would like to run D1, but looking at those recruiting classes... eesh.
I should write, "Your local Community College or mid-level or weak Division III University" and then keep it around to cut and paste in every time.
Could that profile fit a lot of Division II schools? Yes. But if someone can't do half their own research, they deserve no better than a half-effort reply.
It's a bit harder with small school (or state, I suppose) athletes who drop big times for their division and dominate. I have a kid (Jr) who has gone 51/1:56/4:18 and 15:32 for XC. He would like to run D1, but looking at those recruiting classes... eesh.
The right thing for your kid to do is look at great mid-major schools. More to pick from and most would love a kid with range like yours.
It's a bit harder with small school (or state, I suppose) athletes who drop big times for their division and dominate. I have a kid (Jr) who has gone 51/1:56/4:18 and 15:32 for XC. He would like to run D1, but looking at those recruiting classes... eesh.
The right thing for your kid to do is look at great mid-major schools. More to pick from and most would love a kid with range like yours.
He's not the best student, but he works incredibly hard. Bs mostly, but math is a struggle. He's on an IEP and gets solid support. Covid was an awful for him academically without those supports in place. But he can definitely run, and his grades have improved over the years.
I'd love to see his running talents take him somewhere he might not get into on his own, but not one so rigorous that he is in over his head.
Any thoughts on Great Lakes region schools (mid-majors) that may fit this description? Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Illinois, etc.
I've never had a kid this good before, so I acknowledge my own shortcomings when it comes to college programs, recruiting, etc.
It is actually much faster than the times you listed because guys get recruited for their best event, not the9r worst one. A guy with 1:50-4:15-9:30 is recruited for the 800 while a 2:00-4:10-8:50 is recruited for his 3200. It would be clearer if we just looked at each runner's best event and then the median of those. That is what it takes to keep these teams. Looks like 1:52-4:10-9:05.