He was breaking 4 in high school and ran 3:34. That's impressive and going pro is a great move. But he hasn't done much these last 2 years in his main event. PRing by less than a second... He should be knocking on a sub 3:50 mile. He's got super shoes and the greatest mid distance coach in the US according to this thread.
Washington has 7 milers under 3:57 this season. Warhurst had some decent results in the 1900s. Gags and Lanana also had some milers back before smart phones. Step into the 2020s.
Cool. How many of those guys won their race and have also run 2:20 and 7:39 this season?
It is too early to say he is a generational talent. He is a pro now, so he is to be measured by other pros. Qualifying that with his age just means you assume he will keep improving rapidly. That may happen or it may not. You don’t get credit for things that might happen in the future.
Oh my gosh, it’s the end of the world. Can’t be a bad day, illness or injury! His career is over. What a judgmental lot! LetsRun Forums. One bad day and a career ends. I mean look at Woody Kincaid! Oh wait....
This is seriously one of the stupidest threads on a website that is a cesspool of hobby-jogging, jealous morons.
Hobbs is a generational talent who had an off-day. He also ran absurdly fast in the 3k recently, as others pointed out. He clearly is fit and fast, and that will show at some point.
Further, blaming a single bad race that he ran while sick on the coach is stupid, as is comparing Ron to Mike Smith. They're both great coaches with great track records. Get over yourself.
If, like stats don't lie, you're stuck on the idea that Hobbs should be a broke college kid at NAU, then you'd do well to remember that NAU is not the only place in the world that produces fast runners, Hobbs 1500 PR converts to faster than any of the NAU guys PRs, Hobbs is clearly developing the aerobic strength that will help him in the long run this year, plus Hobbs made the smart choice of making a solid living as a teenager.
Finally, the idiots on this thread, and a lot of others, need to get a grip. Just like Athing Mu gets ripped on for not racing enough, or not making her races exciting enough, or any one of a million things, Hobbs is a constant point of criticism on this board. The kid is fast, talented, having fun and has arguably more potential to be a global contender in the 1500m over the next 5-10 years than any other American male. Let him progress at his own rate. Show your jealously by being a fan, not a constant source of hate.
The reason this message board exists is exactly for discussions like this. 99% of critics here aren't hating on Hobbs, they are rooting for him and feel a coaching change is best.
He was breaking 4 in high school and ran 3:34. That's impressive and going pro is a great move. But he hasn't done much these last 2 years in his main event. PRing by less than a second... He should be knocking on a sub 3:50 mile. He's got super shoes and the greatest mid distance coach in the US according to this thread.
So what's the problem?
Exactly, this is the odd thing. He has run great 1ks and 3ks, running well both above and below what should be his star power event. It is starting to seem like a mental block almost.
He’ll be fine in the long run, but he definitely wasn’t himself tonight.
He looked like a certain 75 year old man training under Ritz in super shoes (although not as explosive according to my cousin Gomez). Still looking forward to their showdown.
Obviously, Jim Ryun in 1966 as a 19 year old would not have run as poorly as HOBBS. Quite the contrary. Jim Ryun today, at 75*, at least would have stuck his head in the race more and come through halfway at 1:59.
*If he was wearing super shoes and coached by Ritz.
This is seriously one of the stupidest threads on a website that is a cesspool of hobby-jogging, jealous morons.
Hobbs is a generational talent who had an off-day. He also ran absurdly fast in the 3k recently, as others pointed out. He clearly is fit and fast, and that will show at some point.
Further, blaming a single bad race that he ran while sick on the coach is stupid, as is comparing Ron to Mike Smith. They're both great coaches with great track records. Get over yourself.
If, like stats don't lie, you're stuck on the idea that Hobbs should be a broke college kid at NAU, then you'd do well to remember that NAU is not the only place in the world that produces fast runners, Hobbs 1500 PR converts to faster than any of the NAU guys PRs, Hobbs is clearly developing the aerobic strength that will help him in the long run this year, plus Hobbs made the smart choice of making a solid living as a teenager.
Finally, the idiots on this thread, and a lot of others, need to get a grip. Just like Athing Mu gets ripped on for not racing enough, or not making her races exciting enough, or any one of a million things, Hobbs is a constant point of criticism on this board. The kid is fast, talented, having fun and has arguably more potential to be a global contender in the 1500m over the next 5-10 years than any other American male. Let him progress at his own rate. Show your jealously by being a fan, not a constant source of hate.
Yeah, this. 7:39 at 19 should end the discussion, period.
It's barely February and OP and other incels here are pretending the sky is falling and Kessler will "nEvEr bE/bEaT jAKOb !!!!"
Stupid premise; same thing we went through with Rupp, Jager, etc who had to work their way up. Go for a run or get off the internet and get a life. Careers are not made on Feb warm up/tune up meets
He was breaking 4 in high school and ran 3:34. That's impressive and going pro is a great move. But he hasn't done much these last 2 years in his main event. PRing by less than a second... He should be knocking on a sub 3:50 mile. He's got super shoes and the greatest mid distance coach in the US according to this thread.
So what's the problem?
Exactly, this is the odd thing. He has run great 1ks and 3ks, running well both above and below what should be his star power event. It is starting to seem like a mental block almost.
I would stop the insanity...He was sick....Will not get into details..but I don't think a coaching change is necessary yet, you goobers..
I think people keep ignoring the 2:16.x 1000M the 1:46.x 800 the 7:39.0 3K and the 3:36's and 3:37's as if they are run all the time by 19 year olds here..they are not..not by Americans.
This is a long game approach, there is no pressure or need to run PR over PR over PR at 1500/mile to get better..that I can tell you for certain. For the uneducated on here there is a focus to run faster immediately.
Check Webb's progression..and Ron only had him one year.
It took him three years to go from 3:38 and 3:53 mile to 3:32. More than that to go from 1:47.7 to break 1:45..six years.
. Like I told you, progress is not always linear, ask Gary Martin as well. Not many 8:41 HS 3200M guys who are healthy finish 163rd in NCAA Cross.I doubt he is washed up.
To prove a point..here is Webb progression in 1500 and other events.
Joe Biden needs to ban foreign entities from signing runners out of high school. At this point it is clear that a foreign entity, Adidas, is signing HS runners with the intent to ruining their careers to stop american distance running from being great. Drew Hunter and Hobbs Kessler were not ready for the pro ranks out of high school, they were not ready to compete in pro fields. Just because they could hang mid-back pack doesn't mean they could skip NCAA's. I doubt either of them would have even won NCAA's as frosh, but they would have matured under the excellent coaches at Oregon and NAU, and developed into national champions and guys capable of competing for wins at quality races (the qualifier for the Wanameker mile isn't it). Instead addidas had these guys train with crackpot coaches at start-distance training groups that didn't have people at their talent levels, much moreso for Drew at Tinman elite. These guys had their careers sabatoged. I don't blame them, they were offered real money and as an 18 year old with no idea of adidas malicious intent, why would they have rejected?
But to neutral obsevers, it is now clear, adidas has conspired to keep american distance running from greatness by sabatoging our prodigies. Joe Biden must ACT, he must ban them from signing athletes under the age of 21, and charge executives under RICO for these monsterous acts and ongoing conspiracies.
I’ve done a little more thinking about this and decided to look at some actual data to try and help put Hobbs Kessler in perspective.
Grant Fisher. Arguably the greatest American distance runner ever. When he graduated from Stanford at age 22, had PB’s of 1:51, 3:39, 7:42. Go look at his TFRRS.
Hobbs Kessler, currently age 19. Has PB’s of 1:46, 3:34, 7:39. Still has 2+ years before he will be the age Fisher was when he graduated from Stanford. He and Ron are doing just fine. End of thread.
Kessler is 20 in a month, stop already. He has been pro for 2 years now. It is far from certain that he will continue to improve much. I hope he does, but he doesn’t get credit for improvements that may or may not happen.
Kessler is 20 in a month, stop already. He has been pro for 2 years now. It is far from certain that he will continue to improve much. I hope he does, but he doesn’t get credit for improvements that may or may not happen.
You failed to address the point I made. I never tried to give him credit for improvements that haven’t happened yet. I point to the fact that he is already faster in the 800, 1500, and 3000 than Fisher was as a college senior. Hobbs is the equivalent of a college sophomore. You point to him turning 20 in a month like it shows he’s a season veteran of the sport, pretty hilarious.
Kessler is 20 in a month, stop already. He has been pro for 2 years now. It is far from certain that he will continue to improve much. I hope he does, but he doesn’t get credit for improvements that may or may not happen.
Pro for 2 years eh? You must operate on a different calendar than I do.
You failed to address the point I made. I never tried to give him credit for improvements that haven’t happened yet. I point to the fact that he is already faster in the 800, 1500, and 3000 than Fisher was as a college senior. Hobbs is the equivalent of a college sophomore. You point to him turning 20 in a month like it shows he’s a season veteran of the sport, pretty hilarious.
It is almost like sophomores and seniors are entered in the same races in college. So someone that has been a pro for 2 years (making 1.2M?) is maybe good enough to be a top college guy.
You failed to address the point I made. I never tried to give him credit for improvements that haven’t happened yet. I point to the fact that he is already faster in the 800, 1500, and 3000 than Fisher was as a college senior. Hobbs is the equivalent of a college sophomore. You point to him turning 20 in a month like it shows he’s a season veteran of the sport, pretty hilarious.
It is almost like sophomores and seniors are entered in the same races in college. So someone that has been a pro for 2 years (making 1.2M?) is maybe good enough to be a top college guy.
1. Objectively, he has not been pro for 2 years (24 months). So you’re wrong there.
2. You clearly do not the understand the concepts of “forecasting” or “projection.” By your logic, the current state of affairs is all that matters in assessing talent. For example, a shoe company should give all their money to a 35 year old who’s run 3:59.9 instead of a 16 year old who’s run 4:00.0….why? Because the 35 year old is currently faster, and obviously that’s all that matters! I would stay away from the stock markets my friend, you will go broke quick.
It is almost like sophomores and seniors are entered in the same races in college. So someone that has been a pro for 2 years (making 1.2M?) is maybe good enough to be a top college guy.
1. Objectively, he has not been pro for 2 years (24 months). So you’re wrong there.
2. You clearly do not the understand the concepts of “forecasting” or “projection.” By your logic, the current state of affairs is all that matters in assessing talent. For example, a shoe company should give all their money to a 35 year old who’s run 3:59.9 instead of a 16 year old who’s run 4:00.0….why? Because the 35 year old is currently faster, and obviously that’s all that matters! I would stay away from the stock markets my friend, you will go broke quick.
He has been a pro for 2 years in the same way as he is “19”. You are comparing someone that has been a pro for two years to someone that was just a student athlete and admittedly more concerned with his classes.
The stock market isn’t given to go up. Some startups go big, most fail. You pretend like the only option is for this startup to be the next Google. Declaring it as such before it has gotten off the ground.
Plus... he has stated outright that the focus of this winter is getting stronger not speed because that's where they think he's weakest. So he goes out and trains and then runs a fast 3k and huge PR.
So let's get this straight. Kid has fast PRs, he and his coach decide the best thing for his long term development is to improve strength. He then goes out, improves his strength, and runs a time that would place him at the top end of NCAA history if he had decided to do what all you "he has to be judged as a pro" morons would have had him do. A time that is a huge improvement for him.
But because he was probably sick and had a bad race in February, all the coaching, training and performances that are focused on the long-term potential of a teen athlete in a sport where most runners peak in their late-20s, is bad?
