Clapton goes insane - I am burning my Clapton albums

joed|rt wrote:

I highly doubt the OP has any Clapton albums anyhow. He wants to censor a dissenting viewpoint that doesn’t blindly comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s propaganda. Those wishing to mandate shots on everyone refuse to acknowledge that we are almost all participants in the largest scale drug trial in history.

Hey dude, good news. The trial is over and Pfizer is approved! Just thought you’d want to know.

Big Pharma = Corrupt and only in it for the money, power, and control

Big Governement = Corrupt only in it for the money, power, and control

Big Tech = Corrupt only in it for the money, power, and control

Big Education = Corrupt only in it for the money, power, and control

burritogator wrote:

joed|rt wrote:

I highly doubt the OP has any Clapton albums anyhow. He wants to censor a dissenting viewpoint that doesn’t blindly comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s propaganda. Those wishing to mandate shots on everyone refuse to acknowledge that we are almost all participants in the largest scale drug trial in history.

Hey dude, good news. The trial is over and Pfizer is approved! Just thought you’d want to know.

Thank God the system is not corrupt

He was fine. Took the vaxx. It screwed him up badly. Those are the facts.

Odd that the facts would elicit such an unhinged response from you

Steve The Addict^^^^^^^------- wrote:

Tom Macdonald has made a living off of exposing the liberal narrative and all that is wrong with the govt/media and society. Looks as if others are trying to channel his talent in a form of their own. I commend those brave enough to speak up against the system when they risk cancelation and their career. But the truth is that when mainstream media bands together to paint someone as a lunatic (and many sheep will buy in) it's because that person poses a threat to their interests.

Maybe consider that Tom Macdonald makes god awful music either way. The whole hokey " exposing the liberal narrative" schtick just makes it worse

Correction: it was the Dalai Lama who said "Europe is for Europeans"; I incorrectly stated that it was the Pope early. Honest mistake.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/dalai-lama-europe-refugee-crisis-immigration-eu-racism-tibet-buddhist-a8537221.html

12

Former Eric Clapton fan wrote:

Clapton goes insane - I am burning my Clapton albums

Anybody else is doing that?

Nope, never had any. Has always been overrated.

bigmig19 wrote:

Another side effect of the pandemic...we have found out people we used to look up to or thought were pretty stable...turns out thy are nuts. Jack Friggin' Nicklaus, huge Trump supporter to the extent of writing prose in support of him even at the bitter end. So completely surprising. I guess athletes and entertainers are flawed, who would have thunk. So disappointing, this stuff really brings out who people actually are in their heads.

What's surprising is people in your own family. Who cares about the views of celebrities?

LOL, now who’s suppressing information?

Clapton was not “fine” before he “took the vax.” He’s an elderly man with a history of hard drug use and a chronic medical condition, peripheral neuropathy.

Some time after he was vaccinated, Clapton had an outbreak of symptoms consistent with peripheral neuropathy, which again, is a condition he’s suffered from for years. Clapton is leading people to believe these two things are related. It’s certainly possible that they are; he should talk to his doctor about it.

What Clapton’s not saying is that he’s had these symptoms for years, including a documented case in 2019. Did the vaccine go back in time to hurt ol’ Slow Hands? 😂

Yea, I guess that's right. But yes, maybe I did buy his story as you mentioned... a little, he's done a lot to build up that public persona. Who knows, maybe a little senile as well? Even my stable republican friends jumped the Trump ship. Jack doubled down.

And by spreading those "facts" you are trying to sew distrust. Thus you are part of the problem as always. Nobody spends their days talking about the <1% side effects of all the other life saving vaccines? But you do on this one? Wonder why? Actually we know why.

Former Eric Clapton fan wrote:

Clapton goes insane - I am burning my Clapton albums

Anybody else is doing that?

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/eric-clapton-new-song-this-has-gotta-stop-1217935/https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/eric-clapton-disastrous-vaccine-propaganda-1170264/

You sure are showing him! Burning the albums that you already bought. Now he will have to return the royalties on those. Sucker !

bigmig19 wrote:

And by spreading those "facts" you are trying to sew distrust. Thus you are part of the problem as always. Nobody spends their days talking about the <1% side effects of all the other life saving vaccines? But you do on this one? Wonder why? Actually we know why.

Why is the government and their left-wing sheep trying to convince me to get a vaccine for the Wuhan virus that has a <1% probability of having any effect on me?

To say it again, my health is my responsibility, your health (or anyone else's health in society) is their own responsibility.

Not getting the vaccine.

krispy kremlin._._._._. wrote:

Why is the government and their left-wing sheep trying to convince me to get a vaccine for the Wuhan virus that has a <1% probability of having any effect on me?

To say it again, my health is my responsibility, your health (or anyone else's health in society) is their own responsibility.

Not getting the vaccine.

That's not how it works. Vaccines are a public health measure and they are important.

As a matter of fact you got many of them when you where younger.

If I'm not mistaken -- and I might be -- those vaccines of the past you refer to were highly effective in preventing infection, preventing disease, and preventing communicability. It's unclear that the current Covid vaccines are in the same league on those fronts. The current Covid vaccines' primary value seems to be in preventing Covid from becoming life threatening. Which is pretty valuable! But it also seems to make getting these vaccines much less of a 'public good' issue and much more of a personal issue. Obviously plenty of people don't really care at all about public health and just like pointing fingers and shouting, but there's no vaccine for that.

To me it seems like we simply evolved our definition of 'vaccine' to fit whatever the drug companies had ready to go, and decided to label them 'vaccines' to help comfort the masses, possibly wisely. But I could be wrong; I'm not an immunohistorian.

You’re not quite on base, but it’s a fair question. TL;DR — The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are significantly *more* effective than vaccines against other viruses.

For example, the annual influenza vaccine was only ~30% effective in 2018-2019.

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/2018-2019.html

This is normal. Vaccines naturally mutate fast, so there’s an element of whack-a-mole to any vaccine development.

For COVID-19, scientists identified the spike protein early on as the element to target via vaccination because it’s relatively averse to mutations. But it’s not a silver bullet.

There are some vaccines that are extremely effective (i.e. chicken pox) but those are the exception rather than the rule.

Extremely disingenuous to use the flu vaccine as your counter example. Everyone knows the flu vaccine isn’t that effective.

Just did a simple google source. MMR, tetanus, and hep b vaccines are very effective.

You out yourself as a covidiot when you use the flu vaccine as your defense.