Armstronglivs wrote:
phony al wrote:
No, you didn't. You argued this: "Involuntary manslaughter requires that he was breaking the law when the death occurred." That is WRONG.
You then called the person who you were disagreeing with a "drongo who thinks he has a grasp of the law." Some words that come to mind with respect to your name calling are irony, hypocrisy, humiliation, egg, and face.
More importantly, the phrase that comes to mind is "lack of credibility" meaning that, to the extent you ever had any, you absolutely no longer do. You are a FAKE lawyer.
The statute section in question is a mere sentence long. The relevant portion of it is six words.
Here it is: "Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful manner or without due caution and circumspection."
If you truly felt the need to paraphrase a basic, one sentence legal standard, you could have at least done so in a way that was not 180 degrees the opposite of what the law actually is. See above regarding lack of credibility.
Phony Al, I didn't argue what you think I did - but alas you are determined to prove your lack of intelligence at every opportunity.
"Involuntary manslaughter requires that he was breaking the law when the death occurred."
Maybe someone hacked your account and posted that? Go with that?