Apply Occam’s razor to ask what’s the simplest explanation behind someone breaking into the home of the speaker, second in line from the presidency: political hate or gay sex gone wrong?
Nope. Don't trust them. Want to see the tapes. The tapes don't lie.
Aw, come on, man. Sticking your fingers in your ears and saying NaNaNaNa is no way to analyze a situation. The Affidavit has a summary of a recorded (and Mirandized) interview of DelPapa with some illuminating facts. You sure you don't want to read it?
You sure you don't want to see the tapes? Now those might be "illuminating"
In Trump world, Seb Gorka, Charlie Kirk, Alex Jones are trusted more than police investigating the crime with all the evidence. They love their Orange dictator and his big lie and will never believe that this guy loved it right there with them.
Reality is irrelevant. I'm 100% serious.
Any facts that going against their insane narrative are fake news made up by the corrupt lamestream media. Any unhinged impossible accusation against their perceived enemies from secret sources who know THE TRUTH is 100% believed without any verification whatsoever.
Reality is completely irrelevant.
And if something weird does actually come out, which wouldn't surprise me, weird things happen in this world, it's 100% validation for every bit of lunacy ever.
The real world does not matter at all.
You guys think what the media feeds us is "reality".
Pelosi comments after Republican Scalise shooting:
“For this person to take this action was so cowardly, so cowardly, we all learn more about motivation and the rest of that, but it seems particularly sad, although any violent death, of course, is sad, but particularly sad that at a time when people want us to come together, and we were prepared to come together tomorrow night, that this assault would be made. We cannot let that be a victory for the assailant or anyone who would think that way. So tomorrow we'll go out on the field, we'll root for our team, and want everyone to do his or her very best, and we will use this occasion as one that brings us together and not separates us further.”
maybe a little, but realistically most cops are pretty dumb and make mistakes/misspeak in recounting events and putting together reports. it's not usually nefarious. they are just generally not that good at the job as they appear to be on television.
Pelosi comments after Republican Scalise shooting:
“For this person to take this action was so cowardly, so cowardly, we all learn more about motivation and the rest of that, but it seems particularly sad, although any violent death, of course, is sad, but particularly sad that at a time when people want us to come together, and we were prepared to come together tomorrow night, that this assault would be made. We cannot let that be a victory for the assailant or anyone who would think that way. So tomorrow we'll go out on the field, we'll root for our team, and want everyone to do his or her very best, and we will use this occasion as one that brings us together and not separates us further.”
The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.
After San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott offered details on the incident on Friday, Politico reported that when officers arrived at the house, they "knocked on the front door and were let inside by an unknown person."
This story haas since been changed to eliminate the presence of a 3rd person.
This does not raise any suspicion?
It raises suspicion about the literacy skills of Politicos reporters. You can listen and view San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott's statements in the link below. Then you can ponder why Politico reported it they way they did. Low IQ? No time to proofread? Lousy editors?
San Francisco Police Chief William Scott identified the man as David Wayne DePape. “Our officers tackled the suspect, disarmed him, and took him into custody...
You are really disingenuous person Carmen, because this was cleared up for you several times, including on page 31 of this thread, and we know you read it.
Nope. Don't trust them. Want to see the tapes. The tapes don't lie.
Aw, come on, man. Sticking your fingers in your ears and saying NaNaNaNa is no way to analyze a situation. The Affidavit has a summary of a recorded (and Mirandized) interview of DelPapa with some illuminating facts. You sure you don't want to read it?
Nope. Don't trust liberals with something to hide, especially when they have doubled, tripled, and quadrupled down on a lie. The tapes are objective. You too are terrified of the tapes. All sane, open minded people want to see the tapes. As many tapes as possible from many different angles.
maybe a little, but realistically most cops are pretty dumb and make mistakes/misspeak in recounting events and putting together reports. it's not usually nefarious. they are just generally not that good at the job as they appear to be on television.
So the initial report from the cops that there was a 3rd person who opened the door is false and the guy said it because he is pretty dumb?
Aw, come on, man. Sticking your fingers in your ears and saying NaNaNaNa is no way to analyze a situation. The Affidavit has a summary of a recorded (and Mirandized) interview of DelPapa with some illuminating facts. You sure you don't want to read it?
Nope. Don't trust liberals with something to hide, especially when they have doubled, tripled, and quadrupled down on a lie. The tapes are objective. You too are terrified of the tapes. All sane, open minded people want to see the tapes. As many tapes as possible from many different angles.
After San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott offered details on the incident on Friday, Politico reported that when officers arrived at the house, they "knocked on the front door and were let inside by an unknown person."
This story haas since been changed to eliminate the presence of a 3rd person.
This does not raise any suspicion?
It raises suspicion about the literacy skills of Politicos reporters. You can listen and view San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott's statements in the link below. Then you can ponder why Politico reported it they way they did. Low IQ? No time to proofread? Lousy editors?
You are really disingenuous person Carmen, because this was cleared up for you several times, including on page 31 of this thread, and we know you read it.
Listen to what he says. The door was opened by someone inside and the officers observed thru the open door Mr. Pelosi and the suspect.
This clears it up alright. Strong implication that the door ws opened by someone other than those two.
Aw, come on, man. Sticking your fingers in your ears and saying NaNaNaNa is no way to analyze a situation. The Affidavit has a summary of a recorded (and Mirandized) interview of DelPapa with some illuminating facts. You sure you don't want to read it?
You sure you don't want to see the tapes? Now those might be "illuminating"
Yes! They would be! And I do want to see the videos. I will await their release. I believe we know a bit more about what will be on the videos now. Or at least I do. You and Kobbs don't because you intend to avert your eyes regarding the factual statements in the Criminal Complaint against DePopo, including his confessions.
Just so you know, I may post a few spoilers about what's in the Criminal Complaint. So, don't read the thread any more if you guys don't want to know what happened.
It raises suspicion about the literacy skills of Politicos reporters. You can listen and view San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott's statements in the link below. Then you can ponder why Politico reported it they way they did. Low IQ? No time to proofread? Lousy editors?
You are really disingenuous person Carmen, because this was cleared up for you several times, including on page 31 of this thread, and we know you read it.
Listen to what he says. The door was opened by someone inside and the officers observed thru the open door Mr. Pelosi and the suspect.
This clears it up alright. Strong implication that the door ws opened by someone other than those two.
Listen to the tape.
He goes on to say the cops saw Pelosi and the suspect each with one hand on the hammer. Would you have us believe that during this struggle for the hammer one of the two opened the door for the cops and then returned to fighting?
Trumpers will reject any video tapes. Just like they did with the thousands of video tapes of Jan 6.
this is what trumpers and conspiracy nutters do. They ask for evidence that had yet to appear but when they get such evidence they reject it. rinse. Repeat.
You sure you don't want to see the tapes? Now those might be "illuminating"
Yes! They would be! And I do want to see the videos. I will await their release. I believe we know a bit more about what will be on the videos now. Or at least I do. You and Kobbs don't because you intend to avert your eyes regarding the factual statements in the Criminal Complaint against DePopo, including his confessions.
Just so you know, I may post a few spoilers about what's in the Criminal Complaint. So, don't read the thread any more if you guys don't want to know what happened.
Actually we don't know a thing about what is on the videos as we have not seen them. And probably won't get to see them.
You can believe the criminal complaint without any skepticism if you wish but I would say no adult who has not been sheltered his whole life would be so naive
It raises suspicion about the literacy skills of Politicos reporters. You can listen and view San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott's statements in the link below. Then you can ponder why Politico reported it they way they did. Low IQ? No time to proofread? Lousy editors?
You are really disingenuous person Carmen, because this was cleared up for you several times, including on page 31 of this thread, and we know you read it.
Listen to what he says. The door was opened by someone inside and the officers observed thru the open door Mr. Pelosi and the suspect.
This clears it up alright. Strong implication that the door ws opened by someone other than those two.
Listen to the tape.
Like when you tried to get everyone to listen to the Ukraine tapes.
We did then realised that you haven't got a clue about anything and just read what you want in to it and keep lying about it?
I'm out. All the conspiracies have been debunked and anyone still believing them probably also believes the election was rigged and obama was born in Kenya. Stupid is and stupid does. Nothing will change their minds.
You trumpers will simply believe exactly what you want to believe.
Trumpers will reject any video tapes. Just like they did with the thousands of video tapes of Jan 6.
this is what trumpers and conspiracy nutters do. They ask for evidence that had yet to appear but when they get such evidence they reject it. rinse. Repeat.
Listen to what he says. The door was opened by someone inside and the officers observed thru the open door Mr. Pelosi and the suspect.
This clears it up alright. Strong implication that the door ws opened by someone other than those two.
Listen to the tape.
He goes on to say the cops saw Pelosi and the suspect each with one hand on the hammer. Would you have us believe that during this struggle for the hammer one of the two opened the door for the cops and then returned to fighting?
Whoah! Back up a second here. Where did you get this stuff about fighting over a hammer?