So, then the calling for genocide thing is not a free speech issue but a private property one. Makes their answers at the hearing even worse.
Did Harvard call for any group's genocide?
It’s what they’re allowing on campus. It’s pretty similar to the NFL players kneeling for the National Anthem . If they want to do it in their own house that’s fine but if they want to do it on someone else’s dime, it’s up to their bosses.
What was the motivation to put a woman who's written 0 books, and only 11 journal articles (many of which were riddled with plagiarism) in 26 years of being an academic with no other accomplishments of note to the pinnacle of academia?
No one cared who she was before her embarrassing performance before congress.
But that is not the question to ask and it’s a distraction. There are plenty of incompetent people in high places. What were the motivations of Stefanik, Ackman and other AIPAC adjacent groups to go after specifically Gay and other university presidents when they did? What is the motivation of those same groups to smear Ivy League student groups that support Palestine and attempt to get them fired from their jobs?
Here is a description of Israel’s form of propaganda known as hasbara: “It also seeks actively to inculcate canons of political correctness in domestic and foreign media and audiences that will promote self-censorship by them. It strives thereby to decrease the willingness of audiences to consider information linked to politically unacceptable viewpoints, individuals, and groups and to inhibit the circulation of adverse information in social networks.”
Harvard is a leftist organization run by leftists and it receives a sh*t load of money from Jewish donors and alums which vote majority Democrat.
If you think her resignation was the result of pressure from Republicans alone you're nuts.
The fact that 66% of the presidents were white should put to bed any nonsense about it being racially motivated.
This post was edited 6 minutes after it was posted.
But that is not the question to ask and it’s a distraction. There are plenty of incompetent people in high places. What were the motivations of Stefanik, Ackman and other AIPAC adjacent groups to go after specifically Gay and other university presidents when they did? What is the motivation of those same groups to smear Ivy League student groups that support Palestine and attempt to get them fired from their jobs?
Here is a description of Israel’s form of propaganda known as hasbara: “It also seeks actively to inculcate canons of political correctness in domestic and foreign media and audiences that will promote self-censorship by them. It strives thereby to decrease the willingness of audiences to consider information linked to politically unacceptable viewpoints, individuals, and groups and to inhibit the circulation of adverse information in social networks.”
Harvard is a leftist organization run by leftists and it receives a sh*t load of money from Jewish donors and alums.
If you think her resignation was the result of pressure from Republicans alone you're nuts.
The fact that 66% of the presidents were white should put to bed any nonsense about it being racially motivated.
Not that your previous posts haven't achieved this, but this one proves you really don't have a clue.
What was the motivation to put a woman who's written 0 books, and only 11 journal articles (many of which were riddled with plagiarism) in 26 years of being an academic with no other accomplishments of note to the pinnacle of academia?
No one cared who she was before her embarrassing performance before congress.
But that is not the question to ask and it’s a distraction. There are plenty of incompetent people in high places. What were the motivations of Stefanik, Ackman and other AIPAC adjacent groups to go after specifically Gay and other university presidents when they did? What is the motivation of those same groups to smear Ivy League student groups that support Palestine and attempt to get them fired from their jobs?
Here is a description of Israel’s form of propaganda known as hasbara: “It also seeks actively to inculcate canons of political correctness in domestic and foreign media and audiences that will promote self-censorship by them. It strives thereby to decrease the willingness of audiences to consider information linked to politically unacceptable viewpoints, individuals, and groups and to inhibit the circulation of adverse information in social networks.”
So, if the charges are politically motivated , any crime should be invalidated?
Then why are Dems going after Trump? Or Is that not political?
It’s what they’re allowing on campus. It’s pretty similar to the NFL players kneeling for the National Anthem . If they want to do it in their own house that’s fine but if they want to do it on someone else’s dime, it’s up to their bosses.
Using your genius logic, who is the boss at Harvard?
What was the motivation to put a woman who's written 0 books, and only 11 journal articles (many of which were riddled with plagiarism) in 26 years of being an academic with no other accomplishments of note to the pinnacle of academia?
No one cared who she was before her embarrassing performance before congress.
But that is not the question to ask and it’s a distraction. There are plenty of incompetent people in high places. What were the motivations of Stefanik, Ackman and other AIPAC adjacent groups to go after specifically Gay and other university presidents when they did? What is the motivation of those same groups to smear Ivy League student groups that support Palestine and attempt to get them fired from their jobs?
Here is a description of Israel’s form of propaganda known as hasbara: “It also seeks actively to inculcate canons of political correctness in domestic and foreign media and audiences that will promote self-censorship by them. It strives thereby to decrease the willingness of audiences to consider information linked to politically unacceptable viewpoints, individuals, and groups and to inhibit the circulation of adverse information in social networks.”
I think a lot of the issue was the pretty clear anti Jewish sentiment and clear anti Israel position shown not only at Harvard
i am 66 years old not Jewish but grew up in a town that had enough Jewish population that I went to 7 Bar Mitzvahs
in all of my years i had no idea there was support at this level for Palestine
never ever saw it
Or the outright anti Israel sentiment at such a visible level
Gay had a chance to diffuse her own lack of an at least a more neutral position and clearly botched her Congress appearance
It’s what they’re allowing on campus. It’s pretty similar to the NFL players kneeling for the National Anthem . If they want to do it in their own house that’s fine but if they want to do it on someone else’s dime, it’s up to their bosses.
Using your genius logic, who is the boss at Harvard?
But that is not the question to ask and it’s a distraction. There are plenty of incompetent people in high places. What were the motivations of Stefanik, Ackman and other AIPAC adjacent groups to go after specifically Gay and other university presidents when they did? What is the motivation of those same groups to smear Ivy League student groups that support Palestine and attempt to get them fired from their jobs?
Here is a description of Israel’s form of propaganda known as hasbara: “It also seeks actively to inculcate canons of political correctness in domestic and foreign media and audiences that will promote self-censorship by them. It strives thereby to decrease the willingness of audiences to consider information linked to politically unacceptable viewpoints, individuals, and groups and to inhibit the circulation of adverse information in social networks.”
So, if the charges are politically motivated , any crime should be invalidated?
Then why are Dems going after Trump? Or Is that not political?
I care more that a foreign nation can agitate for the removal of Ivy League presidents than I care that Claudine Gay used incorrect citations in a PhD thesis that until a month ago maybe 3 people had ever read.
But that is not the question to ask and it’s a distraction. There are plenty of incompetent people in high places. What were the motivations of Stefanik, Ackman and other AIPAC adjacent groups to go after specifically Gay and other university presidents when they did? What is the motivation of those same groups to smear Ivy League student groups that support Palestine and attempt to get them fired from their jobs?
Here is a description of Israel’s form of propaganda known as hasbara: “It also seeks actively to inculcate canons of political correctness in domestic and foreign media and audiences that will promote self-censorship by them. It strives thereby to decrease the willingness of audiences to consider information linked to politically unacceptable viewpoints, individuals, and groups and to inhibit the circulation of adverse information in social networks.”
I think a lot of the issue was the pretty clear anti Jewish sentiment and clear anti Israel position shown not only at Harvard
i am 66 years old not Jewish but grew up in a town that had enough Jewish population that I went to 7 Bar Mitzvahs
in all of my years i had no idea there was support at this level for Palestine
never ever saw it
Or the outright anti Israel sentiment at such a visible level
Gay had a chance to diffuse her own lack of an at least a more neutral position and clearly botched her Congress appearance
not many would objectively disagree with that?
You didn't see it because it's new.
Idiots like the people in "Queers for Palestine" are new groups that don't actually know a damn thing about Israel or Palestine.
They've been indoctrinated to believe Israelis are white colonialists and Palestinians are oppressed brown people and they've been taught that white colonialism is the greatest evil the world has ever seen.
So, if the charges are politically motivated , any crime should be invalidated?
Then why are Dems going after Trump? Or Is that not political?
I care more that a foreign nation can agitate for the removal of Ivy League presidents than I care that Claudine Gay used incorrect citations in a PhD thesis that until a month ago maybe 3 people had ever read.
Jews aren't a foreign nation they are the most persecuted group in America.
Do you consider all blacks to be advocates for Africa?
And she didn't incorrectly cite a few things in 1 thesis she plagiarized multiple articles and straight up copied paragraphs with no citation at all in some of them.
I think a lot of the issue was the pretty clear anti Jewish sentiment and clear anti Israel position shown not only at Harvard
i am 66 years old not Jewish but grew up in a town that had enough Jewish population that I went to 7 Bar Mitzvahs
in all of my years i had no idea there was support at this level for Palestine
never ever saw it
Or the outright anti Israel sentiment at such a visible level
Gay had a chance to diffuse her own lack of an at least a more neutral position and clearly botched her Congress appearance
not many would objectively disagree with that?
I think you perfectly summed up the strength of the Israeli lobby and its propaganda by saying this “in all of my years i had no idea there was support at this level for Palestine”
Palestinians are living in an apartheid state as second class citizens. That is an objective fact, yet because the media, politicians, and even universities are so beholden to the Israeli lobby it is not widely known. Any right thinking person would have empathy for the Palestinian cause, however the hasbara machine has made showing even an iota of support for Palestine as equivalent to being a rabid anti-semite.
Calling for a two state solution and equal rights for Palestinians should not mean you are at threat to be smeared and lose your job. It should be the consensus view. History will not look back kindly at the mistreatment of Palestinians for the past 70 years.
I care more that a foreign nation can agitate for the removal of Ivy League presidents than I care that Claudine Gay used incorrect citations in a PhD thesis that until a month ago maybe 3 people had ever read.
Jews aren't a foreign nation they are the most persecuted group in America.
Do you consider all blacks to be advocates for Africa?
And she didn't incorrectly cite a few things in 1 thesis she plagiarized multiple articles and straight up copied paragraphs with no citation at all in some of them.
That last sentence is also a fact that few will bother to check
it was more than just carelessness the quantity shows clear intent here
people should stop excusing sh-t That they would excoriate conservatives for
Jews aren't a foreign nation they are the most persecuted group in America.
Do you consider all blacks to be advocates for Africa?
And she didn't incorrectly cite a few things in 1 thesis she plagiarized multiple articles and straight up copied paragraphs with no citation at all in some of them.
Anyone can say a group is the most persecuted but that does not make it so. In fact, claiming to be heavily persecuted as a defense against legitimate criticism is a chief strategy of hasbara.
All Zionists are by definition advocates for Israel. But of course not all Jews are Zionists, and not all Zionists are Jewish. Attempting to conflate an attack on Zionism as an attack on Jews is again disinformation and propaganda.
I think a lot of the issue was the pretty clear anti Jewish sentiment and clear anti Israel position shown not only at Harvard
i am 66 years old not Jewish but grew up in a town that had enough Jewish population that I went to 7 Bar Mitzvahs
in all of my years i had no idea there was support at this level for Palestine
never ever saw it
Or the outright anti Israel sentiment at such a visible level
Gay had a chance to diffuse her own lack of an at least a more neutral position and clearly botched her Congress appearance
not many would objectively disagree with that?
I think you perfectly summed up the strength of the Israeli lobby and its propaganda by saying this “in all of my years i had no idea there was support at this level for Palestine”
Palestinians are living in an apartheid state as second class citizens. That is an objective fact, yet because the media, politicians, and even universities are so beholden to the Israeli lobby it is not widely known. Any right thinking person would have empathy for the Palestinian cause, however the hasbara machine has made showing even an iota of support for Palestine as equivalent to being a rabid anti-semite.
Calling for a two state solution and equal rights for Palestinians should not mean you are at threat to be smeared and lose your job. It should be the consensus view. History will not look back kindly at the mistreatment of Palestinians for the past 70 years.
And i can see this and could very easily agree
but where have these zealots been for 60 years
and they are not even close to being Palestinians
much closer to anti semetic as to not show themselves until convenient, no?
What was the motivation to put a woman who's written 0 books, and only 11 journal articles (many of which were riddled with plagiarism) in 26 years of being an academic with no other accomplishments of note to the pinnacle of academia?
No one cared who she was before her embarrassing performance before congress.
But that is not the question to ask and it’s a distraction. There are plenty of incompetent people in high places. What were the motivations of Stefanik, Ackman and other AIPAC adjacent groups to go after specifically Gay and other university presidents when they did? What is the motivation of those same groups to smear Ivy League student groups that support Palestine and attempt to get them fired from their jobs?
Here is a description of Israel’s form of propaganda known as hasbara: “It also seeks actively to inculcate canons of political correctness in domestic and foreign media and audiences that will promote self-censorship by them. It strives thereby to decrease the willingness of audiences to consider information linked to politically unacceptable viewpoints, individuals, and groups and to inhibit the circulation of adverse information in social networks.”
Forget the source. Read the embedded tweet from Ackman yourself. Newsflash: he’s a Democrat. But he’s right about the cancer that DEI has become. Young 20-30 year olds on this site would do well to read this and understand it. But, alas, it’s too long.
Bill Ackman is the wealthy Harvard alumnus who has taken the lead in trying to reform that institution. In the wake of Claudine Gay’s self-destruction, he wrote this lengthy Twitter post in w…
much closer to anti semetic as to not show themselves until convenient, no?
I think the rise of new forms of media and the internet has led to awareness of the plight of Palestinians. Hell even 10 years ago you could not go onto YouTube and see Israeli settlers armed with assault rifles seizing land in the West Bank, or Palestinian children getting thrown in prison for resisting IDF detainment.
These are not issues that have ever been covered in the mainstream media, which instead focuses on red team vs blue team partisan nonsense.
And I would hope that people do not care about human rights abuses only when it is their own ethnic or religious background being mistreated.
Jews aren't a foreign nation they are the most persecuted group in America.
Do you consider all blacks to be advocates for Africa?
And she didn't incorrectly cite a few things in 1 thesis she plagiarized multiple articles and straight up copied paragraphs with no citation at all in some of them.
Anyone can say a group is the most persecuted but that does not make it so. In fact, claiming to be heavily persecuted as a defense against legitimate criticism is a chief strategy of hasbara.
All Zionists are by definition advocates for Israel. But of course not all Jews are Zionists, and not all Zionists are Jewish. Attempting to conflate an attack on Zionism as an attack on Jews is again disinformation and propaganda.
You should read less Hamas propaganda and read some more information from the west.
There's over 1100 hate crimes against Jews in America in any given year.
There's around 3,000 hate crimes against blacks in America on average.
3-1 sounds like blacks have it worse until you consider that the black population is 6x larger than the Jewish population.
It’s what they’re allowing on campus. It’s pretty similar to the NFL players kneeling for the National Anthem . If they want to do it in their own house that’s fine but if they want to do it on someone else’s dime, it’s up to their bosses.
Using your genius logic, who is the boss at Harvard?
Anyone can say a group is the most persecuted but that does not make it so. In fact, claiming to be heavily persecuted as a defense against legitimate criticism is a chief strategy of hasbara.
All Zionists are by definition advocates for Israel. But of course not all Jews are Zionists, and not all Zionists are Jewish. Attempting to conflate an attack on Zionism as an attack on Jews is again disinformation and propaganda.
You should read less Hamas propaganda and read some more information from the west.
There's over 1100 hate crimes against Jews in America in any given year.
There's around 3,000 hate crimes against blacks in America on average.
3-1 sounds like blacks have it worse until you consider that the black population is 6x larger than the Jewish population.
The facts make it so not my saying it.
what even is a hate crime? that you use this term shows you are clueless. Is it a hate crime when the USA invades iraq?
