Let's run leaves this crap up while deleting thread about Mom for Liberty people punching high school kids and or sexual assaulting people. I hope it dies.
yeah kinda incredible "diversity" which is just racism is supported by letrun. all democrat posters should be banned. democrats have always been the party of racism and are still today.
Let's run leaves this crap up while deleting thread about Mom for Liberty people punching high school kids and or sexual assaulting people. I hope it dies.
yeah kinda incredible "diversity" which is just racism is supported by letrun. all democrat posters should be banned. democrats have always been the party of racism and are still today.
I’m not sure why the Harvard case is even news. It is just another in a long line of Zionist meddling perpetrated to cause a chilling effect on free speech and distract from the genocide being committed against Palestine civilians in Gaza.
Ackman is an agent of the Israeli Likud government and the lackeys in Congress are fully owned by AIPAC money. Anything else said or reported on the issue is noise.
yeah kinda incredible "diversity" which is just racism is supported by letrun. all democrat posters should be banned. democrats have always been the party of racism and are still today.
It’s instructive to look at the motivation for the plagiarism charges. Why did they come out now? Would they have come out had Gay issued a full-throated paean of support for Israel? Will future University presidents now be hesitant to criticize Israel?
Also, who are the major funders for the thought leaders and members of Congress who led this crusade? Is Stefanik doing the bidding of AIPAC? These are the questions to ask.
That a foreign nation can have such influence on the pillars of American education and culture is concerning, but perhaps not surprising when even the current Secretary of State is a dyed in the wool Zionist.
2) Harvard is a private institution. In the US, private institutions get to decide quite a lot about how they manage their affairs. What is it to you if they felt they needed to make her President? Does Harvard set public policy in this country? Think about that while trying to set your emotions aside.
So, then the calling for genocide thing is not a free speech issue but a private property one. Makes their answers at the hearing even worse.
It’s instructive to look at the motivation for the plagiarism charges. Why did they come out now? Would they have come out had Gay issued a full-throated paean of support for Israel? Will future University presidents now be hesitant to criticize Israel?
Also, who are the major funders for the thought leaders and members of Congress who led this crusade? Is Stefanik doing the bidding of AIPAC? These are the questions to ask.
That a foreign nation can have such influence on the pillars of American education and culture is concerning, but perhaps not surprising when even the current Secretary of State is a dyed in the wool Zionist.
What was the motivation to put a woman who's written 0 books, and only 11 journal articles (many of which were riddled with plagiarism) in 26 years of being an academic with no other accomplishments of note to the pinnacle of academia?
No one cared who she was before her embarrassing performance before congress.
I am wasn't even black. He was mixed race. He was as white as he was black and it is intellectually dishonest to pretend he is just black. No different than Jeter or Markle.
Hussein has always identified as being black, and most importantly he looks black as no one can tell he’s mixed.
Who cares how he looks. Looks are superficial. He is mixed race and there is no denial.
It’s instructive to look at the motivation for the plagiarism charges. Why did they come out now? Would they have come out had Gay issued a full-throated paean of support for Israel? Will future University presidents now be hesitant to criticize Israel?
Also, who are the major funders for the thought leaders and members of Congress who led this crusade? Is Stefanik doing the bidding of AIPAC? These are the questions to ask.
That a foreign nation can have such influence on the pillars of American education and culture is concerning, but perhaps not surprising when even the current Secretary of State is a dyed in the wool Zionist.
Political attacks on education institutions is 100% the most critical issue here. I would add to your questions the motivations of certain Harvard donors and Ackman.
Unfortunately, this forced resignation is symbolic of education losing a battle against right-wing nutbags.
She resigned because of all the negative things that were affecting the University.
She was called everything but a child of God. Thousands of emails, letters and call calling her the N word. This was about attacking her race. Which is what POS people like you always do.
It’s instructive to look at the motivation for the plagiarism charges. Why did they come out now? Would they have come out had Gay issued a full-throated paean of support for Israel? Will future University presidents now be hesitant to criticize Israel?
Also, who are the major funders for the thought leaders and members of Congress who led this crusade? Is Stefanik doing the bidding of AIPAC? These are the questions to ask.
That a foreign nation can have such influence on the pillars of American education and culture is concerning, but perhaps not surprising when even the current Secretary of State is a dyed in the wool Zionist.
What was the motivation to put a woman who's written 0 books, and only 11 journal articles (many of which were riddled with plagiarism) in 26 years of being an academic with no other accomplishments of note to the pinnacle of academia?
No one cared who she was before her embarrassing performance before congress.
wrong. people cared a lot that she was black and such they could enact their racism by making her president over thousands of "not black women" candidates.
Gay responded, "The rules around bullying and harassment are quite specific and if the context in which that language is used amounts to bullying and harassment, then we take -- we take action against it."
Also no Harvard students called for the genocide of Jews. That was a lie from Stefanik
Yep but the nutbags don't want the context or truth. Also, gotta love how Ackman claims to have gone on campus to talk to people which of course now makes him the definitive expert and we should all just believe he's only doing what he's doing to improve Harvard and education in America, lolz.
Plagiarism, and really any academic dishonesty, are indefensible and Gay was rightly let go because of it. Her defense of free speech on campus - even speech that you personally don’t like - is absolutely defensible.
But multiple things can't be right at the same time!!! And we must only focus on DEI and conclude that it's destroying the fabric of our nation!
Plagiarism, and really any academic dishonesty, are indefensible and Gay was rightly let go because of it. Her defense of free speech on campus - even speech that you personally don’t like - is absolutely defensible.
But multiple things can't be right at the same time!!! And we must only focus on DEI and conclude that it's destroying the fabric of our nation!
DEI is racist nonsense.
Like all things the left starts with its heart in the right place and ends up making everything they try to fix worse.
What was the motivation to put a woman who's written 0 books, and only 11 journal articles (many of which were riddled with plagiarism) in 26 years of being an academic with no other accomplishments of note to the pinnacle of academia?
No one cared who she was before her embarrassing performance before congress.
wrong. people cared a lot that she was black and such they could enact their racism by making her president over thousands of "not black women" candidates.
wrong. people cared a lot that she was black and such they could enact their racism by making her president over thousands of "not black women" candidates.
I misread your post. My point was that no one complains when these DEI hires get hired they only complain when they get fired no matter what the reason.
It’s instructive to look at the motivation for the plagiarism charges. Why did they come out now? Would they have come out had Gay issued a full-throated paean of support for Israel? Will future University presidents now be hesitant to criticize Israel?
Also, who are the major funders for the thought leaders and members of Congress who led this crusade? Is Stefanik doing the bidding of AIPAC? These are the questions to ask.
That a foreign nation can have such influence on the pillars of American education and culture is concerning, but perhaps not surprising when even the current Secretary of State is a dyed in the wool Zionist.
What was the motivation to put a woman who's written 0 books, and only 11 journal articles (many of which were riddled with plagiarism) in 26 years of being an academic with no other accomplishments of note to the pinnacle of academia?
No one cared who she was before her embarrassing performance before congress.
But that is not the question to ask and it’s a distraction. There are plenty of incompetent people in high places. What were the motivations of Stefanik, Ackman and other AIPAC adjacent groups to go after specifically Gay and other university presidents when they did? What is the motivation of those same groups to smear Ivy League student groups that support Palestine and attempt to get them fired from their jobs?
Here is a description of Israel’s form of propaganda known as hasbara: “It also seeks actively to inculcate canons of political correctness in domestic and foreign media and audiences that will promote self-censorship by them. It strives thereby to decrease the willingness of audiences to consider information linked to politically unacceptable viewpoints, individuals, and groups and to inhibit the circulation of adverse information in social networks.”