USA Basketball Player Stephen Curry (Golden State, California) doesn't think that USA Astronauts ever landed on Earth's Moon

So you don’t see the hypocrisy in criticizing ad hominem attacks and then attacking ever source?

QFE.

Check and mate.

No Males, No Hermaphrodites, No Meiosis wrote:

Even if the math (division) is wrong, why didn't Soviets send these to Earth's Moon with the testudos, mealworm beetles, and wine flies?

What's even stranger, from an evolutionary biologist's point of view, is the bdelloid's long-term asexuality. For perhaps 80 million years, all bdelloids have been shes, contentedly reproducing without males -- and defying biologists' ideas about the centrality of sex. Sexual reproduction, the thinking goes, introduces genetic variation and so allows a species to adapt to a changing environment and to genetic degradation. It's commonly thought that animals that forgo sex eventually go extinct, but the bdelloid provides a glaring exception to the rule. Legendary biologist John Maynard Smith was so flummoxed by the bdelloids that he called them an "evolutionary scandal."

In normal Science protocol, if data don't fit your theory, you should have to reject or modify it. Is this another example of Western meddling presuming on lack of knowledge?

If the Biologists are defied by Facts, why are they still called Scientists?

Barren Moon wrote:

“Before the year 2000 is over, the first child will have been born on the moon.” Wernher von Braun,

Why not predict when the first Elvis impersonator would appear on Earth's Moon?

[quote]Easier to rewrite the past wrote:

September 30, 2008: Popular Science

[quote]“In ten years I think this conspiracy theory will be gone,” says astronomer Phil Plait/quote]

Now we just need some Hoax Deniers to claim that in 10 LRC pages this thread will be gone.

Official NASA Gov wrote:

June 24, 2005: Opposite charges attract. Like charges repel. It's the first lesson of electromagnetism and, someday, it could save the lives of astronauts.

NASA's Vision for Space Exploration calls for a return to the Moon as preparation for even longer journeys to Mars and beyond. But there's a potential showstopper: radiation.

So, radiation is a "potential showstopper" for returning to the Moon.

And I thought you had that figured out back in 1969?

Or maybe they did on Page 7 and I missed it wrote:

Easier to rewrite the past wrote:

September 30, 2008: Popular Science

Now we just need some Hoax Deniers to claim that in 10 LRC pages this thread will be gone.

It will be over in 2026, when the Apollo docs are declassified by USA.

Anniversary of Apollo 8 when we didn't orbit the Moon a few times.

Promoting the swing, even when it dips wrote:

Easiest way to riddance of "conspiracy theory" is to 'return' (manned) to Earth's Moon.

Plan was 2020 (USA), now delayed. Chinese are always 2 or 3 Five-Year Plans away too.

You dig the grave, so now lie in it.

Brother, we already did return and you still don't believe it.

Typical troll tactic. After being thoroughly beaten he spams up the thread with a page of multiple posts to bury the info.

push it all off into the future wrote:

It will be over in 2026, when the Apollo docs are declassified by USA.

Yeah but, they'll be doctored too.

Final score:

Legit Army- 100

Anti-hoaxers- 0

OneGiantLie

Why would you say that? Because you believed a non-peer reviewed website, that aspires, not to be correct or truthful, but just to be different, written by a College of Arts graduate? The correct conclusion is that Orion went deep into the high radiation of the inner belt, while Apollo did not. Of course the radiation dosimeters for Apollo 7 to 17 went to the moon and back, with astronauts and the command module. Hey, just wondering, what do the Van Allen belts look like on a flat earth? This whole Orion mission must have your head spinning, as the Orion mission peaked at an altitude of 3600 miles (about 3130 nautical miles as indicated on the graph in the press kit) -- placing it much farther than the 3000 mile altitude of the sun and the moon on a flat earth; the inner belt goes out to about 3700 miles, which means both the sun and the moon orbit within the inner belt, and the outer belt goes out as far as 37,000 miles. I can't wait to see the YouTube science explaining that!

Legit question wrote:

Wrong. The dosimetry data for the Apollo program was collected while in LEO - not within the Van Allen belts.

Massive fail and another lame attempt by NASA to pull a fast one.

OneGiantLie

Legit question wrote:

Final score:

Legit Army- 100

Anti-hoaxers- 0

OneGiantLie

You are such a troll. Your source is crap. Mary DM Bennett: author of Dark Moon, which is just the same old conspiracy BS about the photos that has been thoroughly debunked. Oh, and she claims to have psychic abilities.

You've got nothing.

Science bro wrote:

Legit question wrote:

Final score:

Legit Army- 100

Anti-hoaxers- 0

OneGiantLie

You are such a troll. Your source is crap. Mary DM Bennett: author of Dark Moon, which is just the same old conspiracy BS about the photos that has been thoroughly debunked. Oh, and she claims to have psychic abilities.

You've got nothing.

You continue to believe in NASA fairy tales despite every hole that has been exposed. 50 years from now when no further manned mission to the moon materializes, you will still continue to make excuses.

We never landed on the moon.

Legit question wrote:

Science bro wrote:

You are such a troll. Your source is crap. Mary DM Bennett: author of Dark Moon, which is just the same old conspiracy BS about the photos that has been thoroughly debunked. Oh, and she claims to have psychic abilities.

You've got nothing.

You continue to believe in NASA fairy tales despite every hole that has been exposed. 50 years from now when no further manned mission to the moon materializes, you will still continue to make excuses.

We never landed on the moon.

You haven't exposed any holes. Everything you have written has been rebutted and debunked.

Oh, and adding the stupid tagline on all your posts doesn't give any credit to your BS. It actually emphasizes that you are just spreading misinformation. Flat Earther like you has no credibility.

Ground Control wrote:

The correct conclusion is that Orion went deep into the high radiation of the inner belt, while Apollo did not.

Of course the radiation dosimeters for Apollo 7 to 17 went to the moon and back, with astronauts and the command module.

It is true, even the EPA is confused by dosimetry. So you shouldn't feel bad for getting this wrong.

For students graduating in health physics today, or nuclear workers relocating to the United States from

Europe or Asia, their employers will need to train them in systems of dosimetry going back 50 years. (i.e. man-on-moon era)

Science bro wrote:

Legit question wrote:

You continue to believe in NASA fairy tales despite every hole that has been exposed. 50 years from now when no further manned mission to the moon materializes, you will still continue to make excuses.

We never landed on the moon.

You haven't exposed any holes. Everything you have written has been rebutted and debunked.

Oh, and adding the stupid tagline on all your posts doesn't give any credit to your BS. It actually emphasizes that you are just spreading misinformation. Flat Earther like you has no credibility.

Thr Apollo program has more holes than the Titanic. You are a Nasatologist and true believer incapable of accepting that you have been fed a lie for your entire life.

You accept that NASA "lost" the technology and that they destroyed all the telemetry. They did this to prevent indepedent researchers from discovering that the program was fake.

There will never be another mission to the moon- whether it is 50 yrs or 100 yrs from now. With each passing year, more of you will wake up to the truth. You have been deceived. NASA can't fake it anymore.

I will be happy to talk Flat Earth, if you go to the other thread.

OneGiantLie

What do the Van Allen belts look like in your flat Earth model anyway? Do you have a diagram of that?