Reminder that dumb Winston thinks the evidence has shown cohen worked alone. Use his near-zero level of understanding about this trial to judge everything else he says.
actual evidence showing cohen was working with another convicted criminal in the Trump organization- cfo weisselberg.
Re Cohen’s comms w Weisselberg about McDougal: “I expressed to him that we needed funding of $150k ...Allen then said to me, Well, if we do it from a Trump entity, that kind of defeats the purpose, because the point is not to have a Trump name” affiliated with it
You literally haven't read a word of the testimony.
Tell me more about the depth of your understanding.
Weisselberg was imprisoned with a perjury trap specifically so the government could claim he wasn't any more credible than their star witnesses who were both proven liars and Cohen a convicted perjurer himself.
Even if Trump stood in the middle of 5th avenue and hand wrote the check and waved it around and declared that everything you idiots are claiming happened happened. It STILL isn't a crime you absolute imbecile.
Hush money is NOT a campaign expense. Full stop.
adolt is interesting because of the multiple forms of stupidity he very regularly shows. There's the "regular" dumb, where you twist and flex and contort to pretend that Trump horrors aren't Trump horrors.
And then there is the fascinating DUMB dumb, where you type something like, "You literally haven't read a word of the testimony" on an ANONYMOUS message board, and you DON'T realize the idiocy of that, and then go right over to the "Delete" button and erase it.
Yes, believe it or not, adolt knows that Agip has read. Moreover, exactly what he hasn't read.
This is dumb-dumb. And advertised loudly, every day. From the guy who talks about lack of self-awareness. Amazing.
amusing that this m'aga authoritarian posted a graph showing that real wages after inflation are materially higher now than during just about every month of the trump administration (except during Trump's free cash handout period) and roughly the highest in the last 40+ years.
the president does not tell the Supreme court how to rule. The Federalist society tells the supreme court how to rule. And they tell the President what they want from the SC in exchange for getting him elected.
You think you're not in a cult...lol.
Do you honestly believe the left doesn't have a list of approved SCOTUS candidates?
You think the left doesn't demand favors?
Even if 100% of your cultist fantasies are true your cult does the SAME THING!
Tip for you, adolt: No matter HOW LOUD you scream "CULT" at other people, it doesn't change your membership in Trump's.
But relax! Sit back and enjoy jungle life! Just don't get thirsty !!!
You literally haven't read a word of the testimony.
Tell me more about the depth of your understanding.
Weisselberg was imprisoned with a perjury trap specifically so the government could claim he wasn't any more credible than their star witnesses who were both proven liars and Cohen a convicted perjurer himself.
Even if Trump stood in the middle of 5th avenue and hand wrote the check and waved it around and declared that everything you idiots are claiming happened happened. It STILL isn't a crime you absolute imbecile.
Hush money is NOT a campaign expense. Full stop.
adolt is interesting because of the multiple forms of stupidity he very regularly shows. There's the "regular" dumb, where you twist and flex and contort to pretend that Trump horrors aren't Trump horrors.
And then there is the fascinating DUMB dumb, where you type something like, "You literally haven't read a word of the testimony" on an ANONYMOUS message board, and you DON'T realize the idiocy of that, and then go right over to the "Delete" button and erase it.
Yes, believe it or not, adolt knows that Agip has read. Moreover, exactly what he hasn't read.
This is dumb-dumb. And advertised loudly, every day. From the guy who talks about lack of self-awareness. Amazing.
When you idiots are to the left of even MSNBC's analysis of the testimony it's painfully obvious you haven't actually looked at any of the testimony.
My, my, how interesting it would be to see how adolt would do versus Agip on the, "Who can probably read graphs better?" poll question !!
Sorry, I'm going to have to go with Agip, in a tight one.
The stolen valor clown proclaims as he defends agip for linking a graph which undermines his own position.
lol.
hey winston would be outstanding if you did some teaching about why that chart doesn't show that incomes are higher now than during just about every non-handout quarter of the trump administration.
The stolen valor clown proclaims as he defends agip for linking a graph which undermines his own position.
lol.
hey winston would be outstanding if you did some teaching about why that chart doesn't show that incomes are higher now than during just about every non-handout quarter of the trump administration.
Would be so awesome! Go on then!
The graph shows a decline in the Obama years followed by an upward trend in the Trump years followed by a decline in the Biden years.
It's also idiotic to pretend that the minimal movement in wages is even remotely as significant as the explosion of prices at the grocery store.
Your graph shows that wages are largely the same today (396) as they were in Q1 2017 (390). The difference is a normal grocery bill was $200 in 2017 and today the same cart costs $350.
I think maybe you haven't caught up with the New English. Let me help you out with that.
Definitions:
Stagflation: Any inflation that a Trumpette can convince themselves is Biden's doing.
Now, you may ask yourself what a Trumpette calls any inflation that they believe Trump is behind. That is generally called; "Growth. Stupendous growth. Some say the Best growth of all time."
You and WinstonSmith need to get a phucking life!!! You are wayyyyyyy too invested in this Trump shiiiit. Comment after comment after comment 🤦🏽♂️ I have little doubt if given the chance…you would gladly play swallow the glizzie with Ol Raw Dawg Donnie. Freaking groupies.
Does your single mother know you're online again?
You've come to a discussion that doesn't interest you to whine about how much it doesn't interest you.
You sound like a f*cking moron.
Do you ever go to restaurants that serve types of food you don't like and rage at the people in there for eating food you don't like?
I didn’t say the discussion doesn’t interest me. I said I’m sick and tired of seeing you two jackasses comments. You are the biggest Trump diksucker in the world. You ride his nuts like a $10 whore. Please STFU and let other people comment. Shouldn’t you be banging your sister, hunting or watching Newsmax?
hey winston would be outstanding if you did some teaching about why that chart doesn't show that incomes are higher now than during just about every non-handout quarter of the trump administration.
Would be so awesome! Go on then!
The graph shows a decline in the Obama years followed by an upward trend in the Trump years followed by a decline in the Biden years.
It's also idiotic to pretend that the minimal movement in wages is even remotely as significant as the explosion of prices at the grocery store.
Your graph shows that wages are largely the same today (396) as they were in Q1 2017 (390). The difference is a normal grocery bill was $200 in 2017 and today the same cart costs $350.
first off, re groceries...this is real, after-inflation income. It washes out inflation. Sure, some things have gone up more than the general rate of inflation, but others went up less. But inflation is not a factor in this chart.
Second, you can't pick one quarter spikes of data like you did....the data aren't that precise. You look at the general trend and level. And fact is that in the pre-handout Trump economy, real earnings were materially lower than they have been in the Biden admin. People are making more after inflation dollars now, with Biden as president. You can't cherry pick one spiky quarter and take much from that.
Third, I'll agree that a surge started in 2015, during the Obama admin, and carried through to the trump admin. Just one more example of a Republican president being handed a good economy from a Democratic president.
It's too early to say if the 2015 surge has stopped. COVID messed up econ data so much that you can't draw lines before, through and after COVID. It looks like the upward surge is resuming from 2022 on, but it's too early to say.
But we can see levels, and people have been making more after-inflation income now than during the trump admin. The chart shows that clearly.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
Ryan J. Reilly @ryanjreilly “the fact that we support these motherf.ckers [the police], I can’t believe it.” Feds seek 21 months in prison for 6’4” 310-pound Alan St. Onge in his Jan. 6 case.
You've come to a discussion that doesn't interest you to whine about how much it doesn't interest you.
You sound like a f*cking moron.
Do you ever go to restaurants that serve types of food you don't like and rage at the people in there for eating food you don't like?
I didn’t say the discussion doesn’t interest me. I said I’m sick and tired of seeing you two jackasses comments. You are the biggest Trump diksucker in the world. You ride his nuts like a $10 whore. Please STFU and let other people comment. Shouldn’t you be banging your sister, hunting or watching Newsmax?
My name is registered unlike yours. Feel free to block me.
The graph shows a decline in the Obama years followed by an upward trend in the Trump years followed by a decline in the Biden years.
It's also idiotic to pretend that the minimal movement in wages is even remotely as significant as the explosion of prices at the grocery store.
Your graph shows that wages are largely the same today (396) as they were in Q1 2017 (390). The difference is a normal grocery bill was $200 in 2017 and today the same cart costs $350.
first off, re groceries...this is real, after-inflation income. It washes out inflation. Sure, some things have gone up more than the general rate of inflation, but others went up less. But inflation is not a factor in this chart.
Second, you can't pick one quarter spikes of data like you did....the data aren't that precise. You look at the general trend and level. And fact is that in the pre-handout Trump economy, real earnings were materially lower than they have been in the Biden admin. People are making more after inflation dollars now, with Biden as president. You can't cherry pick one spiky quarter and take much from that.
Third, I'll agree that a surge started in 2015, during the Obama admin, and carried through to the trump admin. Just one more example of a Republican president being handed a good economy from a Democratic president.
It's too early to say if the 2015 surge has stopped. COVID messed up econ data so much that you can't draw lines before, through and after COVID. It looks like the upward surge is resuming from 2022 on, but it's too early to say.
But we can see levels, and people have been making more after-inflation income now than during the trump admin. The chart shows that clearly.
You're so blinded by your partisanship you can't even comprehend how dishonest you're being.
Wages increased under Trump. They were at 413 on your chart in Q1 2020 before a single stimulus check went out and when inflation was under 2%.
They peaked at 425 under Trump. They were not "materially lower" than they are under Biden when the wages are literally lower and inflation is 8x higher.
All this chart shows is that you don't understand charts or inflation or real wages.
reminder that despite what winston tells you, there is a crime here. In fact a person and an organization have already admitted they broke laws by paying the hush money to trump's mistresses.
CNN:
Cohen pleaded guilty to two campaign finance charges in August 2018: causing an unlawful campaign contribution for his involvement orchestrating the payment from AMI to McDougal, and making an excessive campaign contribution for the payment to Daniels.
AMI, now known as a360media, was not criminally charged by federal authorities but did admit to making the payment to McDougal. The company paid a $187,500 fine to the Federal Election Commission for making an unlawful campaign contribution.
This post was edited 10 minutes after it was posted.
Today’s testimony is really showing that it was Trumps insatiable desire to stiff people, rip them off and generally be a fucqing cheapskate that has landed him in this hot seat.
1. He wanted to stiff Stormy by not paying her as long as possible.
2. Davis Pecker was livid with Trump because he paid McDougall and wasn’t paying anyone out of pocket without being reimbursed.
3. Michael Cohen turned his life upside down creating an LLC and funding it with his house and Trump rewarded him by slashing his bonus for criming for Trump!
Trump wins the world’s title of being the most decrepit human being ever. He has no redeeming qualities.
Today’s testimony is really showing that it was Trumps insatiable desire to stiff people, rip them off and generally be a fucqing cheapskate that has landed him in this hot seat.
1. He wanted to stiff Stormy by not paying her as long as possible.
2. Davis Pecker was livid with Trump because he paid McDougall and wasn’t paying anyone out of pocket without being reimbursed.
3. Michael Cohen turned his life upside down creating an LLC and funding it with his house and Trump rewarded him by slashing his bonus for criming for Trump!
Trump wins the world’s title of being the most decrepit human being ever. He has no redeeming qualities.
You sure are excited about a vindictive proven liar's testimony.
1. Stormy exposed herself as a liar and a gold digger on the stand. No one believes her.
2. Pecker's testimony hurt the prosecution.
3. Cohen is an liar and a moron.
So long as people like you and Biden exist Trump could never be the most decrepit human being.
first off, re groceries...this is real, after-inflation income. It washes out inflation. Sure, some things have gone up more than the general rate of inflation, but others went up less. But inflation is not a factor in this chart.
Second, you can't pick one quarter spikes of data like you did....the data aren't that precise. You look at the general trend and level. And fact is that in the pre-handout Trump economy, real earnings were materially lower than they have been in the Biden admin. People are making more after inflation dollars now, with Biden as president. You can't cherry pick one spiky quarter and take much from that.
Third, I'll agree that a surge started in 2015, during the Obama admin, and carried through to the trump admin. Just one more example of a Republican president being handed a good economy from a Democratic president.
It's too early to say if the 2015 surge has stopped. COVID messed up econ data so much that you can't draw lines before, through and after COVID. It looks like the upward surge is resuming from 2022 on, but it's too early to say.
But we can see levels, and people have been making more after-inflation income now than during the trump admin. The chart shows that clearly.
You're so blinded by your partisanship you can't even comprehend how dishonest you're being.
Wages increased under Trump. They were at 413 on your chart in Q1 2020 before a single stimulus check went out and when inflation was under 2%.
They peaked at 425 under Trump. They were not "materially lower" than they are under Biden when the wages are literally lower and inflation is 8x higher.
All this chart shows is that you don't understand charts or inflation or real wages.
if you're still going with the 'this chart does not include inflation' then oookay. I guess we're done if we can't agree on that.
Sure, wages increased under trump. But even after growing they were generally lower than what they have been under Biden.
again, you talk of 'peaked.' which you must know is not fair. You can't pick one quarter and make that representative of 4 years. If you want me to do what you do, we'll say that the best Biden quarter was 414 and the worst trump quarter was 378. So by your idiot rules biden income was 9.5% higher than trump income. Is that remotely fair? of course not, so stop it. Anyone can see that in general after-inflation incomes have been higher during the biden admin than during the trump admin.
Fair point on the 1Q2020 income spike. I can't explain that because it was before the handouts. The size and timing of it suggests that it is covid related but I'm curious. Can't be organic - it's too big.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
You're so blinded by your partisanship you can't even comprehend how dishonest you're being.
Wages increased under Trump. They were at 413 on your chart in Q1 2020 before a single stimulus check went out and when inflation was under 2%.
They peaked at 425 under Trump. They were not "materially lower" than they are under Biden when the wages are literally lower and inflation is 8x higher.
All this chart shows is that you don't understand charts or inflation or real wages.
if you're still going with the 'this chart does not include inflation' then oookay. I guess we're done if we can't agree on that.
Sure, wages increased under trump. But even after growing they were generally lower than what they have been under Biden.
again, you talk of 'peaked.' which you must know is not fair. You can't pick one quarter and make that representative of 4 years. If you want me to do what you do, we'll say that the best Biden quarter was 414 and the worst trump quarter was 378. So by your idiot rules biden income was 9.5% higher than trump income. Is that remotely fair? of course not, so stop it.
Fair point on the 1Q2020 income spike. I can't explain that because it was before the handouts. The size and timing of it suggests that it is covid related but I'm curious. Can't be organic - it's too big.
If you want believe the garbage inflation numbers the government puts out feel free. People who actually go to stores and buy things know the 9% number was complete BS.
Wages increased under Trump WITHOUT inflation. They increased LESS under Biden with HISTORIC inflation.
Your cult is polling in the toilet on the economy for a reason.
Nothing about the Q1 spike suggests it's COVID related. You just need it to be COVID related so your absurd argument doesn't collapse even further.
if you're still going with the 'this chart does not include inflation' then oookay. I guess we're done if we can't agree on that.
Sure, wages increased under trump. But even after growing they were generally lower than what they have been under Biden.
again, you talk of 'peaked.' which you must know is not fair. You can't pick one quarter and make that representative of 4 years. If you want me to do what you do, we'll say that the best Biden quarter was 414 and the worst trump quarter was 378. So by your idiot rules biden income was 9.5% higher than trump income. Is that remotely fair? of course not, so stop it.
Fair point on the 1Q2020 income spike. I can't explain that because it was before the handouts. The size and timing of it suggests that it is covid related but I'm curious. Can't be organic - it's too big.
If you want believe the garbage inflation numbers the government puts out feel free. People who actually go to stores and buy things know the 9% number was complete BS.
yeah definitely go with anecdote and gut feel. that'll get you far in economic analysis.
But yes, all econ numbers are approximate, not exact, definitely agree there.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.