Igy - you are cherry picking again. Why did you pick May 1995 and March 2009? Oh, now I know! Just look at this chart and it is very clear why you picked those two dates.
That chart after you click on "Max" shows the Dow going from 3,200 in 1992 to its current 34,000. Pretty good indication of how well the market has done over the last 30 years, despite Igy's contrary viewpoints.
Only you and Flagpole use the Dow as a benchmark. A quick Google search gave this response to your earlier point:
“There have been three periods of at least 13 years when the S&P 500 underperformed what is considered the riskless benchmark, one-month Treasury bills — the 15 years from 1929 to 1943, the 17 years from 1966-82, and the 13 years from 2000-12.”
So based on these facts, the question should be are we closer to your rosy view of the future, or to my historically accurate and factually based one? Place your bets.
Okay then, we won't look at the Dow. Let's look at the S & P: The average annualized return since its inception in 1928 through Dec. 31, 2021, is 11.82%. The average annualized return since adopting 500 stocks into the index in 1957 through Dec. 31, 2021, is 11.88%. That is not even figure in reinvested dividends (I believe) which would add another 1% return. So pretty much 13% which is amazing.
That just shows how consistent the S & P has been.
Only you and Flagpole use the Dow as a benchmark. A quick Google search gave this response to your earlier point:
“There have been three periods of at least 13 years when the S&P 500 underperformed what is considered the riskless benchmark, one-month Treasury bills — the 15 years from 1929 to 1943, the 17 years from 1966-82, and the 13 years from 2000-12.”
So based on these facts, the question should be are we closer to your rosy view of the future, or to my historically accurate and factually based one? Place your bets.
Okay then, we won't look at the Dow. Let's look at the S & P: The average annualized return since its inception in 1928 through Dec. 31, 2021, is 11.82%. The average annualized return since adopting 500 stocks into the index in 1957 through Dec. 31, 2021, is 11.88%. That is not even figure in reinvested dividends (I believe) which would add another 1% return. So pretty much 13% which is amazing.
That just shows how consistent the S & P has been.
95 years of 13% annualized return (on average). What other investment has done even half of that?
Only you and Flagpole use the Dow as a benchmark. A quick Google search gave this response to your earlier point:
“There have been three periods of at least 13 years when the S&P 500 underperformed what is considered the riskless benchmark, one-month Treasury bills — the 15 years from 1929 to 1943, the 17 years from 1966-82, and the 13 years from 2000-12.”
So based on these facts, the question should be are we closer to your rosy view of the future, or to my historically accurate and factually based one? Place your bets.
Okay then, we won't look at the Dow. Let's look at the S & P: The average annualized return since its inception in 1928 through Dec. 31, 2021, is 11.82%. The average annualized return since adopting 500 stocks into the index in 1957 through Dec. 31, 2021, is 11.88%. That is not even figure in reinvested dividends (I believe) which would add another 1% return. So pretty much 13% which is amazing.
That just shows how consistent the S & P has been.
OK, that is obvious and indisputable. Of course that has little to do with the massive bubble created by politicians and unelected bureaucrats, and where we go from here. And by the way, also indisputable is a calendar change does zero to change the current negative environment for stock investors.
No life loser is hilarious. Failed high school track coach who underperforms the market and is clearly bitter at life. Very slow and always has been. Watching you post thousands of times even on weekend nights is hilarious. Can’t wait to outperform you in the market this year and the next 5+. That is, if you and your bald head don’t die off this year.
Sentiment like this didn't last long in Bear Markets..
• My Core Models are near Top levels. • Trash Stocks are rallying identical to last August. • Bulls are taking victory laps. • Bears are openly ridiculed.
I never coached high school track, but consider the group among the best track and field coaches out there. I have never been slow, and I would tend to believe my youthful times and age graded masters times are better than 99% of LRC posters. Even during four and a half months of chemotherapy five years ago I had a full head of hair. Lastly, I do admit to posting frequently, probably on par with Sally, agip, and Flagpole.
This post was edited 7 minutes after it was posted.
The conventional view is to look at the returns the last ten years and extrapolate that is the future without understanding why that is highly unlikely.
We can go from 2000, we can go from 1990, we can go from 1920. Where do you want to go from? No matter what you pick - investors have raked in enormous profits from the stock market. HSGFX has failed miserably over the last 10 years. Do you acknowledge that?
FYI. NASDAQ Feb 2000: 8,209.81. Feb 2009: 1,927.60.
Lost 76.5% over a nine year period.
"No matter what you pick - investors have raked in enormous profits from the stock market."
No life loser is hilarious. Failed high school track coach who underperforms the market and is clearly bitter at life. Very slow and always has been. Watching you post thousands of times even on weekend nights is hilarious. Can’t wait to outperform you in the market this year and the next 5+. That is, if you and your bald head don’t die off this year.
Are you referring to Igy?
I believe he was a college coach. And ran like a 2:18 or 2:19 marathon. And has posted pics of himself before … 70 years old and a thicker head of hair than I’ve ever had.
He’s a permabear … but a straight shooter. You seem unhealthily angry.
And, no new durable high in NASDAQ Composite for over 16 years (3/2000-7/2016).
The magnitude of this bubble is far larger considering all stocks, bonds, housing, art, and crypto. To discount this period as being part of a growing future trend is ignorant of the facts, and really quite foolish. But that is coming from a permabear.
No life loser is hilarious. Failed high school track coach who underperforms the market and is clearly bitter at life. Very slow and always has been. Watching you post thousands of times even on weekend nights is hilarious. Can’t wait to outperform you in the market this year and the next 5+. That is, if you and your bald head don’t die off this year.
Are you referring to Igy?
I believe he was a college coach. And ran like a 2:18 or 2:19 marathon. And has posted pics of himself before … 70 years old and a thicker head of hair than I’ve ever had.
He’s a permabear … but a straight shooter. You seem unhealthily angry.
Thanks. I find “straight shooter” to be the best compliment one could give me. At least I try to be. Interesting that the poster said I was “bitter at life.” I believe if you challenge someone’s belief system it makes them uncomfortable. Leads them to draw conclusions that are not relevant to the conversation.
A rough overlay of the CNN Greed & Fear Index and S&P 500, mainly to offer context for the recent "Extreme Greed" reading.
It's largely a short-term price and sentiment-tracking oscillator. Certainly not a full-cycle gauge, but a reasonable addition to overbought/oversold tools. pic.twitter.com/ixgypPQnz0
Dude, I'm not a perma anything. I just know the market goes up ~73% of the time on a yearly basis and that the overall trend is up. And, YES, our government and others across the world stoke the markets, and they have for DECADES. This is one reason why you should just invest like clockwork.
Your permabear attitude has not served you well, and no one would be wise to take any of your advice ever.
I was buying EM CEFs six months ago when you were shaking in your boots, and would not even consider. Too bad for the permabull.
I told you that I had a hunch that would happen: as I said yesterday:
"Yes. I think the issue with china and their covid travails have been so widely publicized and the impact on Apple's suppliers and fabricators already felt, that the impacts on their bottom line may be priced in already nd won't be a surprise, should the numbers be less than stellar. Okay, my hunch is that it will be used as reason for some selling and profit taking, but will rapidly be pounced upon by longer term investors to load up, thereby reversing a short term selloff."
In this video, we'll take an in-depth look into how the options tail is wagging the stock market dog. Specifically, we'll discuss how option dealers and mark...
1/x In my1st year in the pits of Chicago, I quickly learned a favorite pastime of idle traders on a Friday w/nothing trading was to create a humorously absurd challenge for someone on the floor to undertake & then coax the entire trading apparatus into action betting on outcomes.
"contemplate the crucial fact that market ‘insurance’ itself is critically, reflexively involved in the probabilities of its own outcomes...& so it is that, when people are all hedged, market events tend not to realize, & when they are not they tend to. Hence Brexit Hence 2016"
You were a slow nobody with no accomplishments at OSU. Then you were a failed coach. Clown status. Now you spend your time being an arrogant prick when you’re always wrong about the market. You spend your entire life here trying to act like a know it all. Nobody respects or likes you on here or in real life.