Because Morocco had a GDR type system that was near entirely geared to producing 1500/5000m medalists. No other country in the history of athletics has had that. And they did it slap, bang in the the middle of the EPO era. Spain has had problems with doping, but that's relative to other European countries. Probably nowhere near the doping culture of African countries, which is likely why North African immigrants got to the top even there (as well as France, Belgium..). Spain is also subject to far more stringent testing than Africa. And even if a few Spanish distance runners were on full throttle EPO for a few years back in the day, they still wouldn't have been able to roid as much. Russia doped to get medals. Why would they even bother with the 5000m when all of Africa was doping themselves silly. Most of the Russian population can barely leave their door for half the year because of the weather. Compare to GB or New Zealand or Kenya where you can train year round. You actually think China is an example of doping not working when we saw a country with zero history or apparent talent in distance running suddenly dominate the women's distances, with most of the records still standing, when one small group of female runners doped to the max? I wasn't aware that Sweden was a hot house of doping? How many runners in Sweden have been busted as compared to Kenya or Morocco?
rekrunner wrote:
That's part of what undermines credibilty -- why Morocco, and not athletes from other countries known for doping, like Spain or Russia or China or Sweden.
Let's Tell It Like It Is wrote:
There's a bunch of guys from a small country in NW Africa just a stone's throw away from Spain that ran faster than Moorcroft. ?