Subway Surfers wrote:
said88 wrote:
What are you talking? Your numbers are ridiculous
WTH are you talking about? Here's the official table equivalent
1061 7:59.18 8:44.18 8:36.30 13:41.99 28:47.04
1060 7:59.35 8:44.42 8:36.49 13:42.28 28:47.71
1059 7:59.52 8:44.65 8:36.67 13:42.57 28:48.38
If these are some "official" equivalents, than these official tables are ridiculous and no help at all.
So good this new record of 8:44.32 is, it is still way behind 1:53.28, 3:50.07, 8:06.11 (definitely the best mark), 14:11.15, 29:17,45, 2:15:25.
Why on earth should the women loose 45 seconds because of these (definitely far too low) barriers, when the men loose just 33 seconds (or little bit less, since the mens 3000m record is better than the steeple record).
But Beatrice Chepkoech probably is capable to run sub 8:20 and sub 14:20, maybe sub 14:15.