Not Lance Armstrong wrote:
Coevett wrote:
It's not irrelevant because you still don't have any circumstantial proof that Coe doped. The fact that Aouita' scountrymen were caught 10 years later is slight circumstantial proof that he doped (but important taken with all the other evidence, such as his telling Australian athletes to dope, or his dodgy progression).
The fact that Coe's countrymen did not fail any tests is reason not to suspect Coe on the basis of no evidence at all.
Moroccans were getting caught, and they were setting ridiculous times in the 90's and 00s. That is circumstantial evidence that El G's remarkable achievements were the result of doping, and to a lesser extent (in itself) of the same for Aouita.
No Brits failed tests in the 90's and 00s. So we're lacking that type of circumstantial evidence against Coe and the early 90s guys like Curtis Robb and David Sharpe.
If memory serves me correct, I don't think that Lance Armstrong ever failed a drug test.
No kidding! - how did Armstrong pull that off all those years? Simply amazing!
https://youtu.be/MIl5RxhLZ5U