I'd be very interested to know how much of Jager's non-track workouts are run on a paved surface.
I'd be very interested to know how much of Jager's non-track workouts are run on a paved surface.
He said if he hadn't been on the Fancy Bears list he'd have automatically assumed the other guys are doping. Just like the people that run this site. At least he was honest, but exposed a lack of intelligence and ability to think freely for himself. Here I was projecting a maverick type persona on a man who's essentially nothing more than a sheep.
Nike shills can't read wrote:
Al Gorerythms wrote:The jist is that a list is generated by computer alerting a human to look at some readings. Example a swing in a reading because of training at high elevation falls outside the preset computer parameters. A human views it and says not an unusual reading during switch of elevations.
Just one step in the overall tracking of passports.
A better heading for the list would be results that need human interpretation.
Try to keep up. That is not what likely doping means. Discussed here multiple times and linked on the front page.
My response was to a request for a summary of what Jager said--
from the front page story
Basically with my case, it was run through the initial test and a computer flagged it. And that little line that you saw on the document with my name on it where it said blood values abnormal, suspicious levels, likely doping, is what is spit out by the computer. And after it was sent to that first scientist, he looked it over, I think maybe looked at my past blood results, and he waved it off saying, yeah, this is normal for this athlete at this amount of weeks at altitude. There’s nothing to see here.
So after that first stage, it was sent to someone and he cleared it, which is why apparently I never heard anything about it. The IAAF or WADA never contacted me and they kind of checked me off the list saying that I was clear.
So that’s how it was explained to me. And I’m trying to get a written statement from someone within the IAAF so I can try to publish that.
EJ
I believe my response accurately reflects EJs stated position
Hi Mods!
How many posts have you deleted here? Must've been at least a dozen.
Lame censorship.
I agree. One of my humorous comments was deleted, while some other comments aren’t. IMO, if this is a too sensitive issue for Jager and Nike, then just announce no negative Jager threads/comments will be allowed...and I won't waste time in posting a comment that will be eventually deleted.