Why is the question as to whether a former World Champion suspended for an anti-doping offense, was actually doping in his career, and making the occasional reference to it, an 'obsession'. Why are you using the type of language and shaming tactics the Jama Aden shills use here against anti-dopers like myself? You appear to be turning into Rekrunner. Is this 'obsession' the same type as your 'obsession' for who the 7th best 5000m runner in Ethiopia is?
So you think running 3:28.8 in old spikes, and not being able to break 3:36 in new spikes is evidence that he was not doping, despite being convicted of an anti-doping offence, and an obsession on my part?
Weird.
And Kenyans are older than their stated ages and everybody knows that when it comes to presenting a case to explain their remarkable decline not based on coming off the juice, but it's racist to accuse junior Kenyan athletes of being age cheats?
And being the brother of a white runner, and appearing on a dubious Russian hack likely authorized by Putin, is more evidence of doping than a Kenyan convicted of an anti-doping offence who runs 8 seconds slower in his comeback, despite posting on Social Media frequently of himself training his butt off and motivated to 'prove everybody wrong'?
So strange.
If nothing else, Manangoi's case is highly relevant to the general question as to whether we should ascribe guilt to athletes suspended for wheareabouts failures. You obviously fall in the Rekrunner/Jama Aden shill camp. Unless you just have a peculiar obsession for Elijah.