Just another guy wrote:
Elevation and temperature adjustments are useful guides but acclimatization impacts results.
A HS distance runner fron Houston going to the Simplot games would have found running in the dry thin air next to impossible and the adjustments would hold true, while the locals obviously aren't impacted at all.
On the flip side there were several Houston area outdoor meets yesterday with the 1600m being run in the afternoon in 85F humid weather and full sun,
I dont think those temps really impact the locals (it's been a hot winter) but had somebody like Clinger come down for a meet I guarantee the temps would impact there results.
This is also wrong. I live in a humid climate and workouts times suffer every summer, all summer. You never fully adjust. It's almost as absurd as saying someone running uphill all the time will eventually "adjust" and be capable of running the same times uphill as someone else could run on flat land. There are actual physical factors limiting the body's performance at high altitude or in high heat/humidity climates. The body uses oxygen to run. The body, heart, and CV system work harder in heat and humidity. Despite how much time the body spends in a low altitude environment or high heat/humidity environment, it will always perform better in more optimal conditions.
That being said the adjustment or bump the body receives is idiosyncratic. The NCAA adjustments are simply averages and will vary from person to person. I'd be curious to see if these differences from person to person have been shown to be correlated with a person's home environment, but I'm guessing there is no research to support that claim.
Like someone above said, maybe you can get a job as a scientific adviser for trump. You seem good at manipulating the laws of physics to fit your views.