So people are outraged by Trump not committing to accept election results? Remind me, did Al Gore accept in 2000?

Bad Wigins wrote:

Anyone who commits to accepting the result of an election that is known to be rigged is a traitor to democracy and should be deported to Saudi Arabia.

Where you can kill Jews, Gays, and Christians legally. You are also allowed to rape any woman outside of their home unaccompanied by a male family member even young girls (even if they're getting something out of they're car parked in they're own driveway, not that a female would actually be driving that car). You are also allowed to marry not one, but as many of your own nieces as you like and if they resist, they can be lashed or even executed. You can then donate substantial sums to the Clinton Foundation to cover for you.

This is Africa.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/todd-moss/when-a-dictator-falls_b_8361094.html

Thank you Rojo.

So many people here lack any critical thinking and just gobble up what the media says.

All this pearl clutching and faux outrage makes me laugh.

Trump's statement was equivalent to Gore's actions. "Wait and see" is about as benign as it gets.

Very good click bait rojo.

Some white guy wrote:

Since when is the "rule of the law" killing unarmed (or armed but restrained) black men? They are protesting a legitimate injustice that goes ignored and unpunished.

That unarmed dude pulled over in OK getting murked by the female cop for no reason isn't "fact" enough for you?

No, ONE instance of a guy getting killed by a female cop does not mean there is a larger problem. Are you kidding? There is no legitimacy to the protesting. More whites are killed than blacks. Whites and blacks have equal chances of being killed by police. This is not a race issue. It is a police violence issue. Both whites and blacks are being killed by police. But the Democrats are successfully manipulating people into thinking it is a racial issue.

This is a good example of how the Democrats are the antifact, antiintellectual, and antiscience party not the Republicans.

NativeSon wrote:

if trump hadn't been running his mouth about the election being rigged, that question shouldn't have arisen.

it never arose in the debates where G.H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, G.W. and Obama were involved.

Why now?

You are completely wrong. There has been lots of evidence and proof that aspects of this election are rigged. Wikileaks just published several of those proofs. Wikileaks didn't exist when those previous candidates were running for office. How do you not understand this? Also, there is nothing wrong with dictators.

Al Gore contested the results after the election, not before the election. That's a huge difference.

Peak wrote:

Al Gore contested the results after the election, not before the election. That's a huge difference.

And to be fair to Gore, he was right. He should have been President. Just think... no 9/11, no Iraq, no Afghanistan... just crazy to think about all that.

reality man wrote:

NativeSon wrote:

if trump hadn't been running his mouth about the election being rigged, that question shouldn't have arisen.

it never arose in the debates where G.H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, G.W. and Obama were involved.

Why now?

You are completely wrong. There has been lots of evidence and proof that aspects of this election are rigged. Wikileaks just published several of those proofs. Wikileaks didn't exist when those previous candidates were running for office. How do you not understand this? Also, there is nothing wrong with dictators.

I may have missed it: What did wikileaks say about a rigged American election?

Secondly, I did post something here about a dictator from Zimbabwe called Robert Gabriel Mugabe.

What he did to steal the election was horrific.

I'll re-post it just in case you missed it.

man is an evolutionary mistake.

Let's try to put this in terms that Rojo can understand:

Athlete A says, "If Athlete B beats me tomorrow, I am going to protest. I will refuse to accept the outcome of the race if it is Athlete B who wins."

Supporters of Athlete A are outraged.

Some moron who runs a website says, "Athlete A supporters have no right to be outraged. Remember when Athlete C protested a race result 16 years ago? Sure, that was only after some questionable race contact occurred and it followed standard procedure, but still!"

Carry on.

Goper not groper wrote:

Peak wrote:

Al Gore contested the results after the election, not before the election. That's a huge difference.

And to be fair to Gore, he was right. He should have been President. Just think... no 9/11, no Iraq, no Afghanistan... just crazy to think about all that.

Absolutely incorrect. There is no way to know.

Gore asked for a recount of only a few specific Democratic counties in the state, a clear sign that his camp thought he was not a sure bet to win the state. This was, of course, a patently unfair way to go about a recount, and his motion was denied.

Duh, Homie wrote:

Let's try to put this in terms that Rojo can understand:

Athlete A says, "If Athlete B beats me tomorrow, I am going to protest. I will refuse to accept the outcome of the race if it is Athlete B who wins."

Supporters of Athlete A are outraged.

Some moron who runs a website says, "Athlete A supporters have no right to be outraged. Remember when Athlete C protested a race result 16 years ago? Sure, that was only after some questionable race contact occurred and it followed standard procedure, but still!"

Carry on.

You are a fool if you think you can slip that smarmy, sophomoric bullshit through on a thread I'm watching. You also have your wires crossed. Why would Athlete A's supporters be outraged by a protest against Athlete B?

More generally, FFS quit pretending the election isn't already proven rigged. It is. Wikileaks happened. The real metaphor is Athlete B was caught doping. Get your pseudo-left head out of the sand.

Goper not groper wrote:

And to be fair to Gore, he was right. He should have been President. Just think... no 9/11, no Iraq, no Afghanistan... just crazy to think about all that.

Gore would have been every bit as bad as Bush. He was for the Gulf War, he supported the Iraq war, and 9/11 would have happened just the same with him in office.

And don't forget he's Al Gore Jr. He inherited his senate seat. His role in politics was to be a good ol' boy just like W.

The Afghan war was started by that peace-loving Jimmy Carter. As was the ongoing, pointless US-Iran cold war.

Moral of the story is they are ALL pigs.

So the issue is Trump's statement and not the $hit-storm that has been uncovered by those leaked emails which in any "democratic" country would have put her & the scum acting on her behalf behind bars already....

So the issue is Trump's statement and not the systematic corruption that goes all the way up to the top....

So the issue is Trump's statement and not the fact the "media" have lost any sense of integrity and are the megaphone of one of the two sides...

Anyone sane should see all this for what it is, unless of course it either stands to benefit, depends on it, or is just comfortably numb in it... (btw to the latter group let us share a little secret with y'all: YOU ARE OWNED...)

But PLEASE PLEASE you folks keep feeding on the narrative from those who are in bed with her.. ... After all it is between those "ad hoc" polls and those 10/15k people that have been filling Trump's rallies throughout the country over the last six months...

It is the PEOPLE stupid....

Nobody would expect Trump to immediately accept the results if it was a near tie as in 2000. When he gets thumped by a huge margin this year and calls it voter fraud, it is very different.

Hey NativeSon,

Just a quick heads up nobody in the west thinks the HuffPo is a credible news source.

Singapore's elections are probably at times rigged.

In one English speaking nation I know that the Labour party realised that the election was going to be tight so they sent party activists around a couple dozen old folks home to take them to vote (and these folks were in their 90s) and the activists helped them vote for labour, later on family members were furious because many of these folks were conservatives (when they had all their marbles). There was less than one percent in it.

I am a Republican and am begrudgingly voting for Trump. Moran.