I wasn't completely trolling, but rather just saying that you don't need to be a D-I runner to do well in running. How many olympic medalists over the last 3-4 olympics were D-I runners? Not a ton. I know that there were a few... but... most of the medalists were people who are international runners who train primarily with a club and don't have the traditional American collegiate system responsibilities. If he went to a smaller school like Chico and wasn't put through the ringer all the time (based on all of your glowing assumptions, this kid is way about all the other D-II runners and won't have to try), perhaps he'd end up better in the long run. He wouldn't be forced to peak for XC, race hard during indoors, and then peak again in track year in and year out. He could have a once a year peak (likely USATF nationals in track) and reach high levels of success.
Bauhs would be a great training partner for him and Towne would be a great mentor. You don't have to have huge groups of training partners to be the best. Often times, those amazing groups just end up killing each other. I know that in Morocco they set up training groups specifically for one athlete. All of the rest of the athletes dedicate their training to improving that one runner. Something like this could happen in Chico.
Will he go to Chico? Probably not. Would Chico be the best choice for him (assuming they could get him a full-ride)? Who knows, maybe.... maybe not.
I don't think though that you can say that any other school would be a definitively better option for him.
And to throw one more option out there, I think that he'd be better served going up to Mammoth and training with a pro group right from the start instead of doing the whole D-I thing.