as i pointed out in the post i made on southlake carroll, this is just not true. they dominate texas XC with dozens of kids on subvarsity including kids barely breaking 30.
i think some of this trades in the insinuation the slow kids aren't trying or are disciplinary risks. i remember refereeing pro wrestling antics on the pad between our state champ pole vaulter and state qualified high jumper. i had varsity distance friends who would go hide in the bathroom for parts of workouts. future D1 and minor league soccer player i knew got sent to alternative school for drug dealing. good or bad runners can equally be goof offs or problems. you're making the popular let's run assumption that result = hard work in practice. result can just = talent or years put in.
we had a regional finalist hurdler and shuttle hurdle record holder who only occasionally got meets on our strong junior high team. that junior high team won area and had more than enough kids to fill the events. we rotated events and got those kids occasionally races, not ever meet, not necessarily the championship, but kept them in.
and you can still kick off the kids who don't try or cause issues. i'm saying wait for that to happen instead of assuming the slow kid ruins the team. because they could be a big deal in a few years.
re the time drop discussion, every year there's a story some kid who was running 18 is down to 14 or 15 and competing for state and headed to a D1.