Earnings Scorecard: For Q3 2022 (with 16 S&P 500 companies reporting actual results), 10 S&P 500 companies has reported a positive EPS surprise and 10 S&P 500 companies have reported a positive revenue surprise.
Earnings Scorecard: For Q3 2022 (with 16 S&P 500 companies reporting actual results), 10 S&P 500 companies has reported a positive EPS surprise and 10 S&P 500 companies have reported a positive revenue surprise.
Nope. Everything I wrote is factual. You should try it sometime.
You left this out of your copied factual FactSet report. Just like last week. I wonder why? You should try it sometime. Ha, ha, ha, ha……
“Given the decline in U.S. GDP in the first quarter and the second quarter, did analysts lower EPS estimates more than normal for S&P 500 companies for the third quarter?
The answer is yes. During the third quarter, analysts lowered EPS estimates for the quarter by a larger margin than average. The Q3 bottom-up EPS estimate (which is an aggregation of the median EPS estimates for Q3 for all the companies in the index) decreased by 6.6% (to $55.51 from $59.44) from June 30 to September 29.”
Nope. Everything I wrote is factual. You should try it sometime.
You left this out of your copied factual FactSet report. Just like last week. I wonder why? You should try it sometime. Ha, ha, ha, ha……
“Given the decline in U.S. GDP in the first quarter and the second quarter, did analysts lower EPS estimates more than normal for S&P 500 companies for the third quarter?
The answer is yes. During the third quarter, analysts lowered EPS estimates for the quarter by a larger margin than average. The Q3 bottom-up EPS estimate (which is an aggregation of the median EPS estimates for Q3 for all the companies in the index) decreased by 6.6% (to $55.51 from $59.44) from June 30 to September 29.”
I have been consistently posting - good or bad - the weekly Earnings Scorecard here for years. I leave nothing out of that paragraph. You are welcome to put your own spin on it, but don’t blame me for being fair and consistent.
You left this out of your copied factual FactSet report. Just like last week. I wonder why? You should try it sometime. Ha, ha, ha, ha……
“Given the decline in U.S. GDP in the first quarter and the second quarter, did analysts lower EPS estimates more than normal for S&P 500 companies for the third quarter?
The answer is yes. During the third quarter, analysts lowered EPS estimates for the quarter by a larger margin than average. The Q3 bottom-up EPS estimate (which is an aggregation of the median EPS estimates for Q3 for all the companies in the index) decreased by 6.6% (to $55.51 from $59.44) from June 30 to September 29.”
I have been consistently posting - good or bad - the weekly Earnings Scorecard here for years. I leave nothing out of that paragraph. You are welcome to put your own spin on it, but don’t blame me for being fair and consistent.
Your weekly post is worthless. Always selected bullish. Whatever, the market is delivering the real story.
I have been consistently posting - good or bad - the weekly Earnings Scorecard here for years. I leave nothing out of that paragraph. You are welcome to put your own spin on it, but don’t blame me for being fair and consistent.
Your weekly post is worthless. Always selected bullish. Whatever, the market is delivering the real story.
Oh, and the most insightful piece of information from the FactSet report was what I posted.
I have been consistently posting - good or bad - the weekly Earnings Scorecard here for years. I leave nothing out of that paragraph. You are welcome to put your own spin on it, but don’t blame me for being fair and consistent.
Your weekly post is worthless. Always selected bullish. Whatever, the market is delivering the real story.
I understand that you are not a fan of facts. Nothing is “selected”. It is exactly the same paragraph from their weekly report that I have been posting for years. Just skip over it, if you’re not interested. Why get triggered?